Interviu cu Sf. Petru
- From: † Prof. Dr. Ing. IPS Raspopitul <raspopitul@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
Interview: The man behind the 'God particle'
* 10 September 2008
* From New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free
issues.
* Ian Sample
It is more than four decades since Peter Higgs predicted the existence
of the particle that now carries his name. As the latest, $9 billion
search for the Higgs boson gets under way, Ian Sample managed to track
down this unassuming physicist to find out how he will feel when he is
finally proved right - or wrong
BY THE age of 79, most scientists have put aside the stresses of
working life and settled into quiet retirement. For theoretical
physicist Peter Higgs, the chance would be a fine thing. With the
world's most powerful particle accelerator about to be switched on at
the CERN nuclear physics lab near Geneva, Switzerland, Higgs has
become one of the media's most wanted.
The attention is hardly unexpected. More than 40 years ago, Higgs
predicted the existence of a particle that has proved as elusive as it
is profound. The Higgs boson helps explain the origin of mass for some
of the fundamental building blocks of matter. To the popular press it
is the God particle, which the $9 billion Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
at CERN was built to discover. If the quest succeeds, many suspect
Higgs will be rewarded with a summons to Stockholm.
Higgs, now emeritus professor of physics at the University of
Edinburgh in the UK, is often portrayed as a reclusive genius. Yet
when I met him at his apartment in the city, where neat piles of
science magazines cover the coffee table, and box sets of classical
records sit on shelves alongside art books and figurines, it quickly
became clear that this is a clumsy stereotype. To protect himself from
a barrage of media calls he rarely answers the phone, and he doesn't
have a computer - a reaction against the old "cash register"-style
machines he ran calculations on during his student days. And while he
achieved international recognition for his work in the 1960s - wrong-
footing some of the finest minds in physics in the process - he later
found he was unable to keep up with the field and eventually cut his
losses and moved on.
In conversation Higgs, who has two children - Chris, a computer
scientist, and Jonny, a jazz musician - is affable and verges on the
self-deprecating, as eager to emphasise what he didn't do as much as
what he did. He is unerringly precise, recalling the dates and
discussions of meetings years ago as if they were yesterday. And he is
still very much involved with physics, attending conferences and
meeting up with former colleagues and students.
Higgs made his name with a series of papers, beginning in 1964, which
predicted the existence of an energetic field pervading the universe
which drags on particles that interact with it, endowing otherwise
massless particles with mass. The field, which is thought to have
switched on when the universe was just one 10-billionth of a second
old, has an associated particle, the Higgs boson.
At first most physicists dismissed the idea. Higgs had reached his
conclusions using quantum field theory, which others had written off
as outdated. Several heavyweight groups insisted they could prove him
wrong. "Most of my colleagues thought I was an idiot for sticking with
quantum field theory, but I stuck with it because I didn't believe it
was as dead as they claimed," he says. "It turned out to be the most
important thing I'd done, perhaps the only important thing I'd done."
“My colleagues thought I was an idiot for sticking with the theory”
He was convinced that his work was sound, but was unclear what it
meant for particle physics. Only in the late 1960s, after Higgs had
completed a lecture tour of the US, did Steven Weinberg at the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Abdus Salam at Imperial
College London put the theory to good use - to lay down the first
building block of the standard model of particle physics by unifying
the electromagnetic and weak forces, two of the universe's four
fundamental forces.
From early on, the authorship of the idea behind what we now call theHiggs boson has been controversial. In Belgium, Robert Brout and
François Englert had developed a similar idea via a different route,
as had a transatlantic trio of Tom Kibble at Imperial College London
and two Americans, Gerald Guralnik and Richard Hagen. The Nobel
prizewinner Philip Anderson at Princeton University also claims to
have "invented" the Higgs boson in 1962.
Higgs says the first he knew of the particle having acquired his name
was after a conference at Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois, in 1972. He
heard from a colleague that the name "Higgs" had been attached to
almost everything to do with theories of mass generation by the
conference rapporteur, prominent physicist Ben Lee. "I have to accept
that," Higgs says. "I think I was first to draw attention to the
particle associated with it, and I go around pointing out that nothing
else in this kind of theory was mine or mine alone." What Higgs does
object to is the label "God particle". Though himself an atheist, he
worries that the title "might offend people who are religious".
The Fermilab conference cemented Higgs's position on the world stage,
but privately he was struggling and the success was not enough to push
him to develop the idea further. "There was a problem for me when the
bandwagon started to roll in 1972. Because I'd written an influential
paper, people tended to assume I understood far more about the
subsequent theory than I did and I found it increasingly hard to keep
up. There were personal issues involved in that too. The same year, my
wife and I broke up, though we got back together on friendly terms
later, so while the news from the conference at Fermilab was good for
my morale, I wasn't in a good state for getting involved with the
detailed theoretical work that followed."
Instead, he changed the focus of his work to the field of
supersymmetry, but later found that tough going too. "I realised the
only people who were producing anything that was worth doing was the
generation that had just got their PhDs. After some years, I gave up.
I was sad about it. If I'd done more maths at university I might have
had the right background to do it."
Though Higgs was no longer a major player in the field, instead
devoting time to teaching and supervising, he closely followed the
hunt for his particle at CERN and Fermilab. Along the way, he became
anxious at what he sees as scientists overselling the need to find the
Higgs. In 2000, his fears were realised when CERN's previous collider,
the Large Electron-Positron Collider (LEP), was shut down before
finding the Higgs, prompting the headline: "God particle disappears
down £6bn drain" in The Times of London. "It was a comeuppance for
people who'd oversold the machine on something it might not find,"
says Higgs, "and people are still doing that now."
There are plenty of theories describing what the Higgs boson will look
like. Higgs himself suspects it might turn out to be a number of
supersymmetric composite particles, rather than a single irreducible
one. That would be the first major success to take physics beyond the
confines of the standard model and raise hopes of finally paring down
the unwieldy set of competing models known as string theory, which
many physicists see as a route to an all-encompassing theory of the
universe. "I sit somewhere in the middle on string theory, between
those who think it's the answer to everything and those who write it
off completely. Superstring theories have turned out to contain far
more than we need for our present universe and that's the
embarrassment of it. I wonder if one day someone will find an
intermediate theory that does the job in a better way."
Earlier this year, Higgs visited CERN for the first proper visit since
1979, and like almost everyone who has seen the LHC he was impressed
by its sheer scale. How confident is he that the machine will find his
particle? "What I suspect will happen is that the signal will be there
in the LHC data, but it will take a couple of years to recognise it,
because it's a formidable problem of data analysis. Equally it may be
already in Fermilab's data," he says. "If they do find it, it'll be a
relief."
But what if the Higgs boson is not detected, or Higgs's theory is
proved wrong? "I'll be very surprised if they don't find it. If
someone shows it's wrong, I'll be rather sad but also very puzzled,"
he says. "Then I suppose my life will go a little quiet, I shan't be
pestered so much."
The LHC is scheduled to run for at least 20 years, but Higgs says
funds for its planned successor, the International Linear Collider,
need to be put in place now to ensure it will be ready to take over.
He urges scientists not to repeat the mistakes of the past by
overselling it as a machine destined to find definite answers to the
remaining mysteries of the universe.
As the world waits for the first particles to be smashed together at
the LHC, one thing is for sure: Higgs is likely to have a lot more
phone calls to ignore.
The Large Hadron Collider - find out more about the world's biggest
experiment in our cutting-edge special report.
Quantum World - Learn more about a weird world in our comprehensive
special report.
From issue 2673 of New Scientist magazine, 10 September 2008, page44-45
Profile
Peter Higgs was born in 1929 in Newcastle upon Tyne, north-east
England, and won a PhD in molecular physics at King's College London
in 1954. He taught at University College London and the University of
Edinburgh, where he was professor of theoretical physics from 1980 to
1996. He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1983 and was
awarded the Dirac medal and prize in 1997. In 2004, he was awarded the
Wolf prize alongside Robert Brout and François Englert for pioneering
work on mass generation.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: ruj^ndu-l pe piticu
- Next by Date: nedumerire
- Previous by thread: Titei, sex, droguri si scandal
- Next by thread: nedumerire
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
