Re: Dlaczego Amerykanie najechali Irak?

On Feb 19, 8:48 pm, Heronim <herodi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 19, 5:51 pm, "Grzegorz P. Kruk" <gkruk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Użytkownik "brat_olin" <brat_o...@xxxxxxxxx> napisał w wiadomościnews:fpetec$4uq$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Prosze samemu poszukac. Z tym ze prosze sie nie powolywac
na Powella czy innego Rumsfelda, bo oni bladzili.

Leszek

Taaak jasne amerykańscy generałowie i CIA błądzili tylko pan w Szwecji
odnalazł właściwą drogę.
Tak trzymać!

Panie Grzegorzu, dzieki za dobre slowo w moim kierunku.
By rozwiac zludy wrogow Ameryki, przytaczamjak w temacie:

ALAN GREENSPAN: The issue which, as you know, most people who were
pressing for the war were concerned with were weapons of mass
destruction. I personally believed that Saddam was behaving in a way
that he probably very well had, almost certainly had, weapons of mass
destruction. I was surprised, as most, that he didn't. But what I was
saying is that my reason for being pleased to see Saddam out of office
had nothing to do with the weapons of mass destruction. It had to do
with the potential threat that he could create to the rest of the
world.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And as I said in other commentaries, I have always thought the issue
of what essentially amounts to what is often called pre-emptive,
preventive action on the part of some countries to secure resources or
something else like that, it's an issue that goes back to the Cold
War, when we had the very difficult moral dilemma of what do you do
when you think a missile is coming in our direction and you're not
sure whether it's an accident or not an accident. And that is a
problem which I think is a deep moral problem in civilized society.
And the issue is one which I don't think we're going to resolve very
easily. And as you point out, yes, I am a believer in the rule of law,
and I think it is a critical issue, not only for domestic economies,
but for the world economy as a whole.

Calosc wywiadu jest tu:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nic dodac, nic ujac.

Okazalo sie, ze to nikt inny a Greenspan byl ta grozba dla swiatowej
ekonomii.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dlaczego Amerykanie najechali Irak?
    ... destruction. ... that he probably very well had, almost certainly had, weapons of mass ... Nic dodac, nic ujac. ...
    (soc.culture.polish)
  • Re: OT: The Iraq Democracy Dream Ending Soon
    ... develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. ... "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, ... We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: OT: The Iraq Democracy Dream Ending Soon
    ... develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. ... "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, ... We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: OT: The Iraq Democracy Dream Ending Soon
    ... develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. ... "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, ... We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: OT: The Iraq Democracy Dream Ending Soon
    ... develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. ... We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass ... "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
Loading