"We Slavs are simply Homo Cro-Magnon race and that entity should not be multiplied beyond necessity."

My (http://home.swipnet.se/Piotr_Glownia/) Hypothesis about origins of Slavs:

Origins of Slavs

1. Introduction

Unfortunately, so far scientific matter of origin of Slavs is not settled
unambiguously. Therefore on this page I desire to introduce my own private
opinion reflecting my level of knowledge in this matter, as well as my own
hypothesis about origin of Slavs in support from Nordics', ancient Romans' and
ancient Greeks' mythologies, what permits me in a clear way to point out my
own roots and descent.

2. Historical facts

A) Slavic Bulgarians years 527-565

Byzantine historiographers like Procopius of Caesarea, Jordanes and
Theophylact Simocatta in years 527-565 describe Slavic tribes invading the
Danubian provinces of the Eastern Roman Empire from European locations like
Lower Danube [Southern Romanian Lowland?], Carpathian Mountains [Moldavian
Highland and/or Transylvania?] and shores of Black Sea [another wondering
tribe of Kiev Poliany?].

B) Rise of Catholic Church as the only religion in Roman Empire (313-480).

Catholic Church is a state religion in Roman Empire from year 380. In year 395
is final partition of Roman Empire into the Western Roman Empire, which fell
in year 480 and Eastern Roman Empire, which slowly was recovering and
consolidating for 100 years to become a major power once again from year 518
under leadership of Justinian dynasty (518-602).

3. Mythologies and Religions

A) Major three religious traditions of Europe.

Tradition of Non-Aryan "Old Europe" religion of Neolit age in Europe was
worship of Holy Mother.

Tradition of Semites worship of One God, Creator and it is deriving itself
from religious tradition of Neolitic Europe.

Tradition of Indo-European worship of entire Panteon of Gods and it is only
partially deriving itself from Neolitic Europe religious tradition, as it
encloses it as one of its deities. The bigger rest is obviously made in India.

All three religion traditions like examples of Slavic White Lady of Silesia,
Slavic Sventovit from Pomerania and entire panteon company of Polish Perun are
present and accounted in the pagan Slavic religious gathering. Slavonic pagan
religion today beyond any hope merged with Roman Catholic Church in so called
Polish Roman Catholicism. That Polish Roman Catholicism existed without any
problems between years 966 - 1795. One is to said about modern Polish Roman
Catholic Church, it is still to great despair of German Roman Catholics from
year 1795 to this very day (German Pope in 2006 expressed some concern about
"Catholic Radio of Holy Mother Maryja heaving to do with too much with Polish
politics") uniting of all these three religious traditions under one Roman
Catholic roof.

[It is quite possible that Neolitic worship of Holy Mother is the origin of
the semitic religious tradition of "male God creator". Jahve Judaism and pagan
Slavic worship of Sventovit are probably the same and the one semitic religion
just worshiped by different cultures. The different cultures meant by me
precisely are the pagan Slavic culture and the pre-Egiptian Iranian Jewish
culture of course.]

B) Norse-German Mythology

This pagan worship includes a whole pantheon of Gods and is part of religious
indo-european tradition. It also includes clearly worship of Holy Mother,
represented by two Gods of fertility: male [Semitic point of view?] fertility
God Freyr and female [Neolit-European point of view?] fertility God Freya.

These Gods rule over a mythological race of minor Gods of nature and fertility
Elves, who are dwelling in European forests, underground or even hide in
waters. Elves are youthful-seeming and long-living men and women of... great
beauty [But in comparison to most Germanic and Nordic people who isn't
beatifull?]. Germanic Elves are also an equivalent to the nymphs of Greek and
Roman mythology and to the rusalki of Slavic mythology.

C) Ancient Greeks' Mythology and Ancient Romans' Mythology

This pagan worship also includes an entire pantheon of Gods and is part of
indo-european tradition. Worship of Holy Mother is not clearly declared in
this religion, as worship of nature and fertility. Every aspect has even
couple of Gods protectors. Ancient Romans' worship is borrowing heavily from
religion of the Ancient Greeks.

Lesser goddesses Nymphs in this mythology are not associated with Holy Mother
worship, even if they are companions, mothers and educators to the gods of the
Ancient Greece. Nymphs are a forest female people living in mountains,
forests, undergrounds and even hiding in waters. Nymphs are associated with
gods, who have under their govern aspects of woods like goddess of hunt
Artemis, god of prophecy Apollo, god of alcohol, trees, and even some part of
agriculture Dionysus and also countryside gods of forest, hunt and shepherding
Hermes and Pan. God Pan ["Pan God" herrgottares?] also rules over lesser gods
living in mountains and forests, which is a forest male people called
Panes/Satyrs. God Pan is also the teacher about arts of woods and prophecy for
all gods of Olympus able in these arts like goddess Artemis and god Apollo.
God of drunkenness and for ancient Greeks also of an aspect of foreign
influence Dionysos rules over lesser gods, whom are forest male people called
Ipotane/Seleni. Major difference between Panes/Satyrs and Ipotane/Seleni is
such that the first are potrayed as half-man and half-goat people and the
second are potrayed as half-man and half-horse people. Name Sileni probably
originates from Etruscan word "selvans", which means "of the woodland". Pan
together with Dionysus and drunkenness are together associated with
Panes/Satyrs. All these bigger and lesser gods of Ancient Greece do not drink
wine like people, but only nectar (miod, mead, mied), what suppose to make
them immortal. Pan is the only god ruling that entire forest people of lesse
gods called Nymphs and Panes/Satyrs and this Satyr-Nymph people are in their
turn lesser gods associated with the nature and acts of human fertility.

D) Slavic Mythology

Slavic pagan worship has minimum 3000 years of age and combines in itself all
main religious traditions of Europe. Even these believed in Europe as oldest
in Europe from Neolit (end of stone age), and even from Mezolit (middle of
stone age) of Europe. Slavic mythology is an exceptional collection of
believes, which do not repeat themselves in such a wide content in any other
European mythology. Further minimum of 3000 years of its European development
makes all German "allochtonic" theories about Non-European origin of Slavs or
about Slavic arrival into Europe in some later period then 3000 years ago
after arrival to Europe of first Germanic people a total pile of lies, rubbish
and unusual nonsense. Worship of Holy Mother is very clear and quite
distinctive from other Slavic gods. This is worship of male "Rod", female
"Roda" or even "White Lady", who rules over nature, fertility, creation and
also over Slavic family and Slavic clan.

Rusalki in slavic mythology are forest female people of... ehem... Slavic
women.

[Further "Panowie" is customary title of Polish Clansmen/Polish Nobility.
Origin of that title begins from latin word "commes", which in Polish was
equalled with "zu-pan" and what means "prince". However with time greedy
Polish Magnates wanting uprisal and power prefered over Polish princely title
"pan" lithuanian princely title "ksiaze", which derives from Russin title
"kniaz". The word "pan" itself derives from an older pagan Slavic tradition of
Poland. Title "pan" equals today with modern English "sir" and German "Herr"
or also even "von". Title "pan" however doesn't mean "ruler" in Polish
language, but have Slavic meaning "equal". This makes for instance a normal
age-long Catholic expression "Herr Gott" and "Lord God" in Polish Catholic
fancy new-talk "Pan Bog" expressing "an equal with me, my brother God", which
do not scandalize Polish priests and masses of Non-Slavic Polish, who are the
majority of population of Poland and do not comprehend finer sides of
old-Polish language. Normal age-long Catholic expression in Poland is "Ojciec
Bog", which translates into "Father God" and "Vater Gott".]

E) Tibetan Buddism tradition

Tibetan Buddism is a religion and philosophy based on teachings of Buddha
OEa-kyamuni (the second Buddha in the row) and is not derived from any
European religious tradition. This religion is practicised in Tibet, Himalaya,
Mongolia, Asian part of Russia and north-east China.

"Shangri-la" is a mystical kingdom "behind Himalaya", which teached Asian
Buddistic tantra, which is composed of ritual sex and also combines alcohol
consumption and have some similiarity to latin-greek custom of bacchanalia.
People in this mystical kingdom lived in tranquility. According to
archeological research the tantra itself is older in Asia, then Buddism and
originates from "Zhang_Zhung Culture", which is dated 1500BC - 1100BC, what
makes it younger from similiar to it culture in Europe called "Beaker
Culture", which is dated 2800BC - 1900BC. "Beaker Culture" and "Zhang_Zhung
Culture" have also a common neighbour according to Kurgan hypothesis by Marija
Gimbutas, or even "country man", or also "kins man"... the wandering tribes of
Sarmatians and Scytians. European privilage of nobility to "first night" is
also some form of ritual sex resulting from old pagan traditions of Europe and
therefore in some sense about the same origin like tantra.

4. Archeologic digouts

A) Pomeranian Culture 550BC-200BC

This culture become separated from Lusatian Culture and then it spread [as in
Slavic legend about three Slavic brothers Lech, Czech and Rus, who parted to
three (West, South and East) parts of the world!] over the rest of terrains of
Lusatian Culture and as well it spread over terrains of Milograd Culture and
Czernoles Culture. The original range is delta of river Vistula and the
western coast of the bay of Gdansk.

B) Milograd Culture 700BC-100BC

In this culture are traces of protobaltic and protoslavic cultures. Also known
as "Pidhirtsi" culture in Ukraine. It is an iron age culture. The range is
modern South Belarus and Northern Ukraina.

C) Chernoles Culture 750BC?200BC

There are traces of nomad-farmer Scythians culture with partial slavic culture
and for now it is considered the place "source" of protoslavic language. It is
formed from Zarubintsy Culture of Sarmatian/Scythian origins [Also Sarmats
(not Slav yet?) Anti and Sarmats-Scythians Tyverti?]. It is an iron age
culture. The range is Northen Ukraina between Dniester and Dnieper rivers.

D) Lusatian Culture 1300BC-400BC

This is culture with traces of cultures like protoslavic, protogermanic,
tracian and ilirian. This culture derives itself from two earlier cultures:
Unetice (protolusatian) culture in the western part and Trciniec culture in
eastern part. This is late bronze and early iron ages culture. The range is
Eastern Germany, Poland, Czech, Slovakia, Western Ukraina.

E) Tradition of Unetice Culture 2300BC-1600BC

That gathering of similiar to eachother cultures with traditions clearly
tighed up with Unetice Culture. These cultures are: Alderberg, Straubing,
Singen, Neckar-Ries and group of Upper-Rhine in Germany, Unterwölbling in
Austria, Hatvan i Nagrev in Hungary, Nitra i Kost'any in Slovakia and
Trzciniec in Poland. This group of culture descends from Beaker Culture. This
is an ealry bronze age. The range is Germany, Poland, Czech, Austria, Hungary,
Slovakia and Western Ukraina.

F) Beaker Culture 2800BC?1900BC

This culture is atypical, as not tied currently with any ethnic group by
scientists!

This culture includes cultural traces like warrior Slavic society and drinking
of traditional Slavic drink called "miod" (pl. honey) in the Eastern Europe
and "mead" or "mied" in Western Europe from bell shaped cups (like these old
Polish drinking horns for drinking mead), as it is clear from their ornament.
This culture is example of an early Indo-European culture, which in one part
is derived from early Corded Ware culture, but in second part it is derived
from east and central European cultures, which become "Kurganized" under
incursions from steppe tribes from east. This culture is from late stone and
early bronze ages. The range is Spain, England, East Irland, France without
Central part of France, Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Czech, also directed to
African continent Southern part of Sycicili and West-North part of Sardinia.

G) Corded Ware culture 3200BC-1800BC

This is culture with traces of cultures like ProtoBaltic, ProtoSlavic,
ProtoGermanic, ProtoCeltic and ProtoItalic. It is also a first culture of
Germanic people, who came from Asia to Europe. This culture seems to be in the
begining dominantly non-Indo-European of Neolitic "Old Europe" origin, which
with time and new Indo-European arrivals become more and more dominantly
Indo-European. This culture is the only clear inheritor of Funnelbeaker
culture. This culture stretches from the late stone age, the copper age and
ends in the early bronze age. The range is the most of continental northern
Europe from the Rhine river on the west, to the Volga river in the east,
including most of modern-day Germany, Denmark, Poland, the Baltic States,
Belarus, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, northern Ukraine, western Russia, as
well as coastal Norway and the southern portions of Sweden and Finland.

H) Funnelbeaker Culture 4000BC-1900BC

This is clearly Nonindo-European [first pure NON-ARYAN! HURRRAAAH!!!] culture.
The Funnelbeaker culture is believed to be the origin of the gene allowing
adults of Northern European descent to digest lactose. However this mutation
is in less degree also available for all Indo-European people in Europe and
Asia and it also includes Africa's black people like Tutsi and Massaia. This
Nordic effect can be just a result of just 300 years of selective breading
amongst any kind of people with this genetic mutation. This culture settlement
is characterised by single "one family" houses. This culture is sole inheritor
of Neolitic "Old Europe"'s Ertebolle culture from Danmark. This is a Megalitic
"great stone" age culture. The range is territories of modern states
Netherlands, Belgium, Danmark, Southern Sweden, Northern Germany, Northern
Poland and suprisingly down the Polish river Vistula to the area of city
Krakow, where it obviously made incursions on Lengyel culture, which was also
a non-Indo-European culture of Neolitic "Old Europe", but already poluted with
Indo-European "kurganization" cultural influences. The Lengel culture
settlement is characterised by mixture of single "one family" houses and
longhouses.

I) Neolitic "Old Europe" 7000 p.n.e. - 1700 p.n.e.

This past of Europe is not well known. This is the time, when first
Indo-Europeans arrive to Europe, but there are also culturally significant
influences from Africa (mainly in Mediterrean culture, but not only).

Ertebolle culture is a culture of Western European natives, whom were
according to archeological diggouts mixed race Cro-Magnon. This mixed group
lived together and lived on hunting, fishing and gathering. Whatever
comsumption bound with agriculture showed only with arrival of Funnelbeaker
culture. The range is Southern Sweden, Danmark and Northern Germany.

Other centers of Western European Natives are:
Shores of Southern England ("Windmill hill")
West-Northern France ("Armorican Megalitism" and "Reucedur")
Pireneian Mountains ("?")
Western Spain ("Lusitanian Magalithic")

Western Natives are associalised as origins for Basks. However Neolitic Spain
also had "La Almagre Pottery" culture in South Spain in that time. The Spain
is also place where African cultural incursions are to be found outside of
Meditarrean culture's borders in Europe.

Eastern European Natives had only one centrum in Dniepr-Don area of modern
Belarus and Northern Ukraina.

J) Capsian Culture 10000BC-6000BC

According to some Maroccan archeologists in Atlas's caves in this cultures are
to be found some characteristic traces, which can be described as
"proto-protoSlavic".

Culture of two quite different groups of Homo Sapiens. Originally, Maghreb in
north in Atlas Mountains dwelled group of "Europeans", the Cro-Magnoids
(called also Iberomaurusians or Protomediterraneans), and to the south in
Sahara dwelled group of "Africans" (Mechta-Afalou). About 8000BC from east
come "European" speakers of Afro-Asiatic languages such as Berber and joined
besides existing already "European" Cro-Magnoids. This culture has clear
connetions with Kenia Capsian Culture (13000BC-8000BC). This is culture from
an early stone age. The range is for its Cro-Magnoids "Europeans" Maghreb's
northern part (Maghreb is modern Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia and attested in
Cyrenaica (Libya)).

K) Cro-Magnon 35000BC-10000BC

Cro-Magnoids (Iberomaurusians) are descendants of Cro-Magnon man, who is the
earliest known example of the oldest modern Homo Sapiens from Europe. It is
also species, which exclusively lived in and evolved in on terrains of entire
European continent, which was free from icebergs. That Cro-Magnon mixed with
Homo Neanderthalensis is archeologically proved.

Range: Entire European continent.

L) Homo Neanderthalensis - Neanderthal 230,000BC - 10,000BC

Species of descendants of Homo Erectus that inhabited Europe and part of
Western Asia. Way of Neanderthals' life little differed from way of
family-clan living of Slavs in Poland in 1000AD with that exception that
Neanderthals did not farmed land in any way. Neanderthals' language is as
Slavic languages a nasal language and differs as Slavic languages differ from
throat languages of modern Western Europeans and Hindus from India.

Range: Entire European continent and Western Asia.

5. European DNA

Family Tree DNA YCC classification;
Y-chromosome haplogroups;

A) Mediterean DNA.

Like Mediterean people the haplogroup I first arrived in Europe around
20,000-25,000 years ago from the Middle East. It is believed to be associated
with the Gravettian culture. Under Neolitic Europe their culture was clearly
migrating from Italy and Balkans and crashing with European Cro-Magnons
cultures in North migrating from Spain. Their most probable haplogroup is
haplogroup I (M170). Haplogroup I is evenly spread over Europe. However this
haplogroup is in large concentrations occuring in Celtic, Croatian,
Scandinavian, Greek [Egeians?] and Anglo-Saxon populations. Haplogroup I is
native haplogroup to Europe. It is originating from haplotype F* (M89), which
is an African gene, which marks what is believed "second wave of human
expansion out of Africa 45000 years ago".

B) Semitic DNA.

Semites are people of haplogroup J* (J1 = M304 and J2 = M172), who today are
living mostly in North Africa and Middle East, but in Neolitic Europe
populated also according to cultural archeological findings also Balkans and
Eastern Europe. M304 is a haplotype most notably found in Italians, the Lemba
of Southern Africa, who have a tradition of Jewish ancestry and some groups of
Kurds. M172 is possesed by Jews, Arabs, Kurds and other Middle-Eastern
populations, but M172 is also found in large concentrations in Greece, Italy,
Turkey and Caucasus region. It is also found in India, where the subclase J2b2
is widespread and subclase J2a is mainly restricted to South and East Indian
populations like Brahmins. M172 is believed of Anatolian origin and may be
suggestive that it was originally a part of the Proto-Aryan DNA. [We Polish
"Nobility" Slavs are proven to be the least related European people to Jewish
people, what seems now to be proven by "Proto-Aryan" M172 the genetic fact
above any antisemitic doubt and accusation.]

C) Aryan DNA.

Haplogroup K (M9) first appeared approximately 40,000 years ago in Iran or
southern Central Asia. Today, haplogroup K and its descendant haplogroups are
the patrilineal ancestors of most of the people living in the Northern
Hemisphere, including most Europeans, many Indians, and almost all Asians.
Haplogroup K is ancestor to haplogroup P.

Haplogroup P (M45) is believed to have arisen north of the Hindu Kush, in
Siberia, Kazakhstan, or Uzbekistan, approximately from 35,000 to 40,000 years
ago and contains the patrilineal ancestors of most Europeans and almost all of
the indigenous peoples of the both Americas. Haplogroup P is ancestor to
haplogroup R. [So "white people" were "red people" before?]

Haplogroup R (M207) is believed to have occured somewhere in North West Asia
around 30,000-35,000 years ago. Haplogroup R is ancestor to sub-haplogroup R1.

Sub-haplogroup R1 (M173) is possessed by all existing Indo-Europeans.
Sub-haplogroup R1 parts into haplogroups R1a1 and R1b.

Haplogroup R1a1 (M17) is prevalent in Eastern European, Central Asian, and
India's populations. Highest density of M17 in Europe occurs in Eastern Europe
and Northern Europe. Particularly Poland and Russia are countries where every
second man has it. Its spread in Europe (including British Isles) is
associated closely with migration movements of Vikings [Vikings are Eastern
Europeans?]. M17 is close related to haplogroup R1b.

Haplogroup R1b (M343) is prevalent in Western Europe and due to Western
European emigration in North American and etc populations.

D) Cro-Magnon's DNA.

Today it is believed without any proof, that the members of Y-chromosome
haplogroup R1b are descendants of the Cro-Magnon. To the contrary of
historical records, which states that the member of Y-chromosome haplogroup
R1b 2000 years ago still were arriving to Europe directly from Asia (Spanish).

Cro-Magnon's DNA is simply not defined at the moment by scientists.

Cro-Magnon were the first documented human artists making sophisticated cave
paintings and that together with signs of elaborate astrological moon dating.
They are native population to the European continent. They mixed even with
Neanderthals, who are even an earlier group of European natives.

[A simple assumption would be that this DNA suppose to be parallell with
Y-chromosome haplogroup A and originating from Africa some 40,000 years ago
and not neccesarily from the same ancestors of the modern Homo Sapiens Sapiens
of haplogroup A. From around 10,000 years ago also mixed in some degree with
Neanderthal DNA.]

E) Slavs' DNA.

Today it is believed without any proof, that the members of Y-chromosome
haplogroup R1a1 are Slavs. To the contrary of historical records, which states
that Slavs did not ever populated steppes of the Eastern Europe or steppes of
Western Asia.

Slav's DNA is simply not defined at the moment by scientists.

Already first historical Slavs according to Jordanes belonged to three
different groups of Anti (Sarmatians-Scytians & Slavs), Sclavene (Slavic
Bulgars) and Venedi (Ethruscans-Troyans & Slavs). This partition is not
different from modern partition between Slavs, Magyars (Ungro-Finns & Slavs),
Ukrainians (Sarmatians-Scytians & Slavs) and Lithuanians (Balts & Slavs). It
is partition based on kinship. It is probable that one of the Slavic tribes in
Poland also is one of the tribes of Vandals.

Haplogroup R1a1, which is common to Eastern Europe has to be actually
Sarmatian and Scytian DNA. Physiological appearance of all modern Slavs in
Central-Eastern Europe have much in common with that Sarmatian and Scytian
DNA, as we Slavs are known to mix with Sarmatians and Scytians. This also
makes a medieval claim of Polish Clansmen that we are actually Polish Slavs
and Polish Sarmatians in the same time, as historic (Slavic tribe of
Upper-Dniestr Tyverti) and genetic truth. However we Slavs are not of
Sarmatian or of Scytian origin and we Slavs do not acknowledge any common
ancestors or any kinship with any pure birth Sarmatians and/or Scytians.

mtDNA Eu19 is not a patriarchal genetic marker but a matriarchal marker and it
more accurately locates in the very middle of Europe (East Germany, Poland,
Belarus, Czech and Slovakia) something what can be called a "female Slavic
DNA". It doesn't exist in the Western Europe [which is very strange after
these "masses" of these "Slavic slaves" supposedly taken in medieval times by
Aryans before Xth century] and it gradually disappears in countries to the
east and to the south from Poland. Poland has the highest 54% concentration of
mtDNA Eu19. mtDNA Eu19 is not occuring in any "steppe" West Asian and "steppe"
North India populations. Too bad luck that of these 54% of the "female Slavic
DNA" in Poland actually only 25% can be clearly traced to historical Polish
Slavs, the Polish Nobility. It is conceivable that Slavic Silesians and
Eastern German settlers are responsible for the other 25% of that "female
Slavic DNA" concentration in modern Poland.

[We Slavs define ourselves as "the people of the common ancestors" and
therefore it has to be possible to find with genetic tests on inheritance
these "common ancestors" of all or at least most of original Slavs. Simple
method of obtaining that pure Slavic DNA, which would differ from Aryan DNA
R1a1 and would be still similiar in range of spread with mtDNA Eu19 and also
covering Western European Slavic populations would be by making a genetic test
of all Polish Clansmen, curently the most pure genetic Slavs in all Europe due
to a custom called "no mesalianses with lesser classes!".]

6. Scientific theories

A) Polish Clan (Rod/Rid) Theory.

The essence of this theory is opposition of the different Slavic Eastern
European model of clan development of society to the Aryan Western European
model of feudal development of society. The theory is based on archaic
remainders of original Slavic clans in the Eastern Europe up to medieval times
and in some cases even up to modern times. Historical social-legal
institutions of Russians, Bulgarians, Serbians, Polish, Czech totally removed
out of contexts of the medieval Aryan mass colonization of Eastern Europe were
structured into ethnically Slavic one natural entirety. This entirety suggest
existance of an uniform and complex "ancient" code of Slavic law from which
descend all ethnically Slavic medieval constitutional and legal institutions
in the Eastern Europe.

The theory leans itself on popular in XIX century opinion of J. G. Herder
about different road of development of people on basis of a different way of
their thinking. This theory foundation was created by a stream of articles
written by Polish historian Oswald Balzera at the end of XIX century and
begining of XX century on subject of the first historical settlements on
terrains of the Eastern Europe. Oswald Balzer sketched in his articles some
ethnically different road of social development in some ethnic parts of
Eastern European societies. This theory was formulated in full as "Polish
ancestral [pl. "rodowy" means "ancestral", pl. "ród" means "clan", directly
means "clan'ish"] theory" by pupils of Oswald Balzera like Przemyslaw
Dabkowski and Zygmunt Wojciechowski. The theory turned however totally useless
to the nationalists, who tried to bend it to nationalism in Poland and cover
with it also the Aryan part of "ethnically Polish" population of Poland under
common paraply of "Slavs" together with Slavic part of "ethnically Polish"
population of Poland. Marcel Handelsman put in question "clan" development as
being in absolute contradition to "feudal" development in 1917, but his
thoughts were not continued in newly created in 1918 state of Poland.

Arguments against that theory are comparisons with ethnically Aryan dwellers
of Eastern Europe and their Western European way of life and Roman and
Orthodox Catholic Churches' desperate and stubborn actions of cleansing of all
traces of Slavic ethnicity in Europe (the actions, against which Polish
Kingdom heroicly defended Poland for 800 years up to the Partitions of Poland
in year 1795). This theory is being clearly contradicted with obvious lies.

This theory's strangulation and trampling it under foot after year 1945 in
Polish history science is credited to the contribution of the "victorious" and
"the only one and correct" ideology of Marxism-Leninism, which ideology and
merites argumentative superiority over Polish Clan Theory can be read in book
[2] of Jan Adamus from 1958.

Resistance to this theory also shows in light such a dangerous procedure
excercised by modern Polish history scientists like defining in serious XXI
century scientific studies Polish Volochs from Podhale, which are Aryan people
from Romania and Moldavia and other different ethnically Aryan groups in
Poland, as ethnic Slavs from Poland.

The only minus of this theory is not taking under consideration mixing Slavs
with other people and approach to this issue in manner of "Slavic purity",
which is after example of VI century Bulgarians known to every moron as total
nonsense. Also under consideration are not taken antiSlavic influences of
antiSlavic actions of Orthodox and Roman Catholic Churches directed against
Slavic ethnicity. And to the Catholic Churches reflection should be brightly
stated here that, the way of reliving nature by us Slavs can not be Pagan in
any way, because Romans (in Greece and in Italy), who were burning Catholics
alive and praying to Pagan Gods for centuries, were not relieving nature in
exactly the same way in their latin civilization.

Sources:
1. Ihnatowicz I., M^(1)czak A., Zientara B., ?arnowski J., "Spo^(3)eczen~stwo
Polskie od X do XX wieku", wydanie czwarte, poprawione i rozszerzone,
"Ksi^(1)?ka i Wiedza", Warszawa 1999, ISBN: 83-05-13080-0;
2. J. Adamus, "Polska teoria rodowa", ?ódY" 1958;
3. Marcel Handelsman, "Z metodyki badan~ feudalizmu", 1917.

B) Multiregional Origin Hypothesis

This hypothesis speculates that modern Humans migrated from Africa all over
the world, where they mixed with other Homo subspecies like Homo
Neanderthalensis, Peking Man, Homo Erectus, Homo Floresiensis and Mungo Man.
In result of this mix some certain differentiation has resulted among modern
people.

Discovery of a hybrid race Cro-Magnon and Homo Neanderthalensis fossilised
child at the Abrigo do Lagar Velho rock-shelter site in Portugal in 1999
proved this hypothesis certain validity. This discovery had to be specialy
quite annoying to critics of this hypothesis, as there are obvious biological
problems with giving birth to a Neanderthal child by a Cro-Magnon or Homo
Sapiens Sapiens woman and such racial mixes just weren't expected. And against
all odds!

7. My Hypothesis about origins of Slavs

Corded Ware culture (battleaxe culture) is the culture, which is
archeologically thought to be last culture in simple way belonging to Homo
Cro-Magnon race slowly mixing with Homo Sapiens race. This culture is the
place in Europe from where cultures of Germanics, Celtics and Slavs clearly
are derived from. However Germanic people are of the documented origins from
India, Celtic-Italic people are proven genetically to have large concetrations
of Mediterean genes and only we Slavs are like Homo Cro-Magnon race in no
clear definition by scientists about our genes or relationship. Slavs in their
ancestors and Homo Cro-Magnon in their inheritors are leaving much modern
science to explain.

Using scientific rule of "Occam's Razor" saying

"entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem"

"entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity"

I reach following conclusions, that we Slavs are simply entirely different
from Homo Sapiens race even probably also in descendance a Homo Cro-Magnon
race natively living in Europe from 35 thousends years and also supposedly
mixed with so different from Homo Sapiens and Homo Cro-Magnon races the Homo
Neanderthalensis race, which is also native in Europe race of proto-humans
from even earlier times. We Slavs differ ourselves biologically so drastically
from Homo Sapiens, that even though we are today a mix with Meditarean
mutation of Homo Sapiens like Cetics and Ethruscans (Wenedi), and also with
Aryan mutation of Homo Sapiens like Sarmatians and Scytians (Anti) to whom we
even today resemble with our outlooks, the Germanic rasists during Second
World Wide War couldn't in any biological-genetic way position us Slavs in
common classification at least with such Aryans like these from Caucasus and
steppes of Western Asia and commited on us Slavs as "worse race of slaves" a
greater holocaust in scale of victims, then the one commited on just 6
millions of Jews.

We Slavs and our Homo Cro-Magnon race left after us a clear archeological
trace in Europe during last 10,000 years clearly showing, that we Slavs are
not originating in any Asia, and ice age we spend in Spain in Europe and in
Northern Magreb in Africa.

The hole, which occures in our historic existance in Europe we thank Catholic
Latin savages, who were destroying all material traces bound with our Slavic
written language (here we were not so lucky like Incas and memory of Slavic
written language remains only in sources of first hand witnesses of pagan
Slavs), pagan religion (which would be understandable), and even so extremly
as even pre-christian non-religious customs (like Slavic clans). It is
Catholic Church which create us Slavs as slaves from VI century without ground
in any greater amounts of slaves, which could be taken to slavery in Slovenia
and Northern Italy, or also during the three Catholic crusaides against Pagan
Slavs before X century in the cetral Germany. Our Slavic ancestors weren't any
slaves and against lies of false German-Latin and Bizantine Catholic Churches
were amongst European people a living walking half-men half-gods for ancient
Pagan Europeans before X century. Catholic Church in so outstretched way went
in its hunt on Pra-Slavs, that even picture of devil in Catholic Church is
modelled on Latin and Greek believes about Pra-Slavs.

However German-Latin and Bizantine Catholic Churches sliped over their own
institutionalized falsification and their own institutionalized lie, when
quarrelsome and disobiedient prince Mieszko I Piast baptized Poland, but
"unintentionally" relinguished to bring to Poland Latin-German civilization
and also "unintentionally" did not subordinate Polish Catholic Church any
administration of Roman Catholic Church or Orthodox Catholic Church, creating
such a first of its kind in Europe proto-protestant Catholic Church in Europe
based on early christianity believes and on Slavic civilization and in so very
effective way, that the most anti-Slavic Catholic attempts of Catholic Roman
Church in ereasing Polish Church's paganisms during last 200 years of foreign
occupation didn't entirely washed away from Poland our institutionalised in
Polish Catholic Church pagan Slavic believes. Therefore Slavic tradition
prevailed negating propaganda of Westerneuropeans and Latin people about
imputed slavery of Slavs and Asian origins of Slavs.

We Slavs are simply Homo Cro-Magnon race and that entity should not be
multiplied beyond necessity.

(my full work with all links for futher reading can be found on
http://home.swipnet.se/Piotr_Glownia/Pochodzenie_e.htm)

Piotr Głownia, szlachcic polski koronny
--
--
Złota Wolno?ć, Ksenofobia i Szlachta to WIWAT "RP1 Odrodzona" nie dla żarta!
Szlachta i ?lšzacy to jedyni Słowianie Polacy.
Aryjskim go?ciom za wizytę podzięka i daj Bóg niedługo też i rozłęka.
Polska to nie Niemcy, więc Antysemici to Cudzoziemcy!
Polskš Fryce rzšdzic nie bedš, gdyż Fryce Dmowskiego martwe bedš.
.

Relevant Pages