Re: Gay Marriages - The Step-by-Step Decline of Western Civilization
- From: "Torpedo" <guest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 12:54:30 +1000
....Paedophilia - The Step-by-Step Rise in Islamic Civilization
"Faris Jawad" <ana_faris_bila_jawad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8Fd_e.4683$cq2.477846@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Gay Marriages - The Step-by-Step Decline of Western Civilization
>
> When humans make laws, it is inevitable that there will be grave flaws and
> far reaching consequences. Everybody seems to want rights, no matter how
> diverse or perverse. In the Supreme Court's 2002-2003 term, Lawrence et al
v
> Texas handed down a law that will change the course of America's future:
> "Gays are entitled respect for their private lives." Based on the 14th
> Amendment of the Constitution, gays have the right to privacy: "The State
> cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their
> private sexual conduct a crime."
>
> It is thought that in the last hundred years this ruling along with Roe v
> Wade will have the strongest impact on society. The moral effect of this
> ruling will probably not be felt for years. It is like opening a can of
> worms. First the right to privacy, then gay marriages, gay adoption, gays
in
> the military and gays in the work place. It is "said" that six out of ten
> Americans believe that homosexual sex between consenting adults should be
> legal.
>
> Only one of the Justices openly showed disgust for the law. Justice
Antonin
> Scalia read from his bench "taking sides in the culture war" and that the
> rest of the Justices have "largely signed on to the so called homosexual
> agenda." But if it is true that six out of ten American's and six out of
> nine Supreme Justices condone homosexual behavior, then God has forewarned
> us that we are truly in serious trouble.
>
> "The people of Lut (Lot) rejected (his) warning. We sent against them a
> violent Tornado with showers of stones (which destroyed them), except
Lut's
> household: thus do We reward those who give thanks. And (Lut) did warn
them
> of Our Punishment, but they disputed about the Warning." [The Holy Qur'an
> (Surat al-Qamar 54:33-36)]
>
> We have been warned that this will truly be the decline of any
civilization.
> From both a Biblical and Jewish standpoint this is truly perversion.
Prophet
> Lut was sent as a messenger to one of Abraham's neighboring communities.
> These people, as the Qur'an tells us, practiced a perversion unknown to
the
> world until then.
>
> Allah states in the Qur'an: "The people of Lut (Lot) rejected the
> messengers. Behold, their brother Lut said to them: "Will ye not fear
> (Allah)? I am to you a messenger worthy of all trust. So fear Allah and
obey
> me. No reward do I ask of you for it: my reward is only from the Lord of
the
> Worlds. Of all the creatures in the world, will ye approach males, and
leave
> those whom Allah has created for you to be your mates? Nay, ye are a
people
> transgressing (all limits)!" They said: "If thou desist not, O Lut! Thou
> wilt assuredly be cast out!" He said: "I do detest your doings." (Surat
> ash-Shu'ar'a 26:160-168)
>
> Civilizations who openly practice homosexuality will surely become losers
> and will be punished severely by Allah. Though homosexuality has been
> practiced by a minority of people since the people of Lut, the pursuit of
> open gay rights really started in 1895 when a man by the name of Oscar
Wilde
> was convicted for "gross indecency between males." Years later, the first
> formal gay activist group was founded in Chicago and in 1969 came the
"birth
> of the gay rights movement."
>
> 1975 was the "coming out of the closest" year, wherein Former NFL player
> Dave Kopay announced he was gay. In 1977 Anita Bryant worked very hard
with
> conservatives to block gay rights. In 1986 the Supreme Court ruled in
Bowers
> that sodomy is a crime. In 1993 the U.S. military adopted the "don't ask,
> don't tell" policy for gays. 1993 hosted one of the most visible acts of
gay
> activism, wherein gay-rights supporters marched on Washington. In 1996 the
> "High court" ruled that gays have equal rights under the constitution. In
> 2000 Vermont couples were allowed to form "civil unions." A fight for
> banning gay adoption was fought in 2001, and finally in 2003 an openly gay
> Episcopal bishop was elected in N.H.
>
> As we can see, gays were first given rights under the "right for privacy
> act." This is the problem with man-made laws: they are fallible, open for
> interpretation, and without God dictated morals are changed to suit the
> times. Ibn Al-Qayyim wrote: "The punishment of the evil-doer (homosexual)
> will be greater than the punishment of an adulterer for the reason that
all
> of the Companions are unanimous on it and that its degree of prohibition
is
> greater and its mischief is far reaching. It is for this reason that the
> grave punishment sent to the Ummah (Nation) of Lut by God was not given to
> any other Ummah."
>
> Allah has warned mankind that there is no change in Allah's laws: "They
> swore their strongest oaths by Allah that if a Warner came to them, they
> would follow his guidance better than any (other) of the Peoples: But when
a
> warner came to them, it has only increased their flight (from
> righteousness) -- On account of their arrogance in the land and their
> plotting of Evil, but the plotting of Evil will hem in only the authors
> thereof. Now are they but looking for the way the ancients were dealt
with?
> But no change wilt thou find in Allah's way (of dealing): no turning off
> wilt thou find in Allah's way (of dealing)." (Surat Fatir 35:42-43)
>
> The people of Lut enjoined a very high standard of living, similar to the
> people of Pompeii. Pompeii is known for its perversity. "The removal of
> Pompeii from the face of the earth by such a disaster was not purposeless.
> The historical record shows that the city was a center of dissipation and
> perversity. It was marked by a rise in prostitution to such an extent that
> even the number of brothels was not known. Male organs in their original
> sizes were hung on the doors of the brothels. According to this tradition,
> rooted in Mithraic belief, sexual organs and sexual intercourse should not
> be hidden but displayed openly."
>
> Though Newsweek states that six out of ten Americans agree that
homosexuals
> have the same rights as heterosexuals (if the statistics are accurate),
many
> Americans are aware that the war against homosexuality is starting to
spiral
> out of control. The National Review has written many articles against the
> growing "rights" of homosexuals and how their agenda is truly becoming
more
> and more "in our face."
>
> "The answer is that homosexual acts are not and never can be marital.
Sodomy
> has been discouraged and prohibited, for basically the same reason that
> fornication and adultery were: to protect marriage as the principle or
> litmus line of sexual morality. Sex is for marriage, and marriage is (not
> coincidentally) the morally legitimate setting for bringing children into
> this world."
>
> As Muslims, we know that homosexuality is wrong, illegal and punishable.
It
> is a disease that rips the very fabric of society. Growing up as an
> American, I remember being taught that we should not be prejudicial
against
> anyone's beliefs or actions as long as they are not hurting anyone else.
> Now, on TV it is almost impossible to find a series that doesn't
incorporate
> at least one homosexual character let alone homosexual couple. The
> homosexual agenda is far reaching and can easily brainwash our children
> without even knowing it. Who knows when the day will come when orphans
from
> Muslim countries will be adopted by "gay couples?" There is no escape from
> the punishment of this horrendous crime.
>
> The following excerpt was published in the San Francisco Chronicle:
>
> Marriage is not a civil right. Neither the federal nor the state
> constitutions confer such a status upon it. Marriage is a privilege
granted
> and conferred by legislative bodies for specific reasons, including its
> impact on society. Special legal protections and favors have rightly been
> given to heterosexual, monogamous marriage because, unlike other kinds of
> human friendships or relationships, it has been considered to be uniquely
> necessary and uniquely beneficial to the perpetuation and well-being of
> society.
>
> Though many of our enlightened, progressive contemporaries have tried to
> assert otherwise, the facts are now in: More than 30 years of a grand
social
> experiment with "alternate" families has irrefutably demonstrated that the
> dissolution of traditional two-parent families has proven harmful to large
> numbers of children.
>
> "Family diversity" in the form of increasing numbers of single-parent and
> step-parent families has not strengthened the social fabric, but rather,
> dramatically weakened and undermined society. The assumption that a new
kind
> of homosexual "alternative family" will be an exception to this experience
> is totally unfounded.
>
> Recently, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, in a contemptuous and
> brazen attempt to turn the social order upside-down, foisted upon city
> residents a new civil ceremony for homosexual and lesbian "marriage." This
> attempt to institutionalize "alternative relationships" and to place them
on
> an equal footing with heterosexual, monogamous marriage will do nothing
but
> further the social disaster that already surrounds us.
>
> Since its inception, the Christian church has consistently opposed all
> activities and conduct that destroy human life. History has demonstrated
> both the wisdom and the correctness of this position. The devastation of
> human life in San Francisco has only further proven the catastrophic
results
> of abandoning this stance.
>
> Tragically, anyone who would dare to express concerns about the disastrous
> consequences of these insidious forms of sexual behavior is thereby
labeled
> a "homophobe" and a "bigot," and is taunted with cries of "shame! shame!"
>
> Government should have a fundamental, compelling interest in the
> reproduction of society, the adequate socialization of individuals who
> constitute society and in seeing that children are directed toward
healthy,
> productive lifestyles. The state, legitimately, is responsible for
promoting
> these fundamental, social objectives - none of which is furthered by
> homosexual marriage.
>
> The Qur'an reminds us all of this reality: "Do they not travel through the
> earth, and see what was the end of those before them? They were superior
to
> them in strength: they tilled the soil and populated it in greater numbers
> than these have done: there came to them their messengers with Clear
> (Signs). (Which they rejected, to their own destruction): It was not Allah
> Who wronged them, but they wronged their own souls." (Surat ar-Room 30:9)
>
> When "man made laws" override God's laws, civilizations can only expect
> destruction. Despite the fact that thousands of years have gone by, and
> places, technology and civilizations have undergone many changes, not much
> has changed in the aforementioned social structures and the etiquettes of
> the unbelievers. As we have emphasized above, a certain part of the
society
> in which we live has all the qualities of the people described in the
> Qur'an.
>
> Just like Thamud who gave short measure, there are also a great number of
> forgers and swindlers today. There exists a "homosexual community" that is
> defended whenever the occasion arises, and its members do not fall short
of
> the people of Lut in whom sexual perversion had reached its peak. A great
> part of society is made up of people as ungrateful and rebellious as Saba,
> as unthankful for the wealth endowed to them as the people of Iram, as
> unsubmissive and insulting towards the believers as the people of Nuh, and
> as heedless to social justice as 'Ad.
>
> Allah warns us: "We destroyed generations before you when they did wrong.
> Their messengers brought them the Clear Signs, but they were never going
to
> believe. That is how We repay evildoers. Then We made you their successors
> on the earth so We might observe how you would act." (Surat Yunus
10:13-14)
>
> Tuesday : 02/12/2003
>
> http://www.islamweb.net/ver2/archive/article.php?lang=E&id=51533
>
>
.
- References:
- Gay Marriages - The Step-by-Step Decline of Western Civilization
- From: Faris Jawad
- Gay Marriages - The Step-by-Step Decline of Western Civilization
- Prev by Date: Re: Islam's Stand on Homosexuality
- Next by Date: Re: Whom Must We Worship?
- Previous by thread: Gay Marriages - The Step-by-Step Decline of Western Civilization
- Next by thread: Islam's Stand on Homosexuality
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
