Evolve or perish



Sunday April 27, 2008
Evolve or perish
http://thestar.com.my/columnists/story.asp?col=sharingthenation&file=/2008/4/27/columnists/sharingthenation/20080427073552&sec=Sharing%20The%20Nation
Sharing the nation
By ZAINAH ANWAR


This is the last chance for this government to get it right or else the usual
10-year electoral cycle of ?rise and fall? in the performance of the ruling
party will be broken. It will be the fall and fall.

JUST Do It. This should have been the motto in 2004 when the Prime Minister
received an overwhelming mandate for his change agenda.

But it took the verdict of March 8 to finally move Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad
Badawi to take substantive steps to deal with the long-standing demands from
civil society and the opposition parties to redress past wrongs and strengthen
Malaysia?s democratic structures and values.

First, his announcement to set up a Judicial Appointments Commission on April
17.

Then on April 21, the announcement to revamp the Anti Corruption Agency into an
independent commission with accompanying new laws, enforcement powers and public
procurement procedure. Over the past weeks, several ministers, new, and old ones
with new portfolios, have talked about the urgent need for reform.

Information Minister Datuk Ahmad Shabery Chik and Home Minister Datuk Seri Syed
Hamid Albar have both promised more press freedom, with the latter undertaking a
?re-look? at the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 to move with the
times.

Higher Education Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin has promised to table
amendments by the end of the year to the unpopular Universities and University
Colleges Act1971.

The Minister in charge of Law, Datuk Zaid Ibrahim, has brought within one month
more substantive change in the administration of justice in this country than
what any other law minister has done in years.

He successfully pushed for the setting up of the Judicial Commission, first
proposed by the Bar Council in 2003 and by Suhakam in 2005.

He remains committed to restoring Article 121(1) to its original wording as the
1988 amendment had diluted the doctrine of separation of powers between the
Executive and the Judiciary.

And he has promised to review all the ouster clauses introduced in several laws
in the mid to late 1980s which made the decision of the minister final and not
subject to any judicial review.

The mainstream media editors and journalists are once again demanding that the
oppressive Printing Presses and Publications Act be reviewed, if not repealed.

Stung and rejected by the public, the mainstream newspapers are now making up
with a daily dose of often incisive and critical writing on Malaysian politics.

Reading the morning papers over breakfast could become a habit again. It takes
March 8 for those in authority to realise that it is better to unleash
mainstream journalism ? once built on a tradition of fair, balanced, accurate,
fact-checked reporting ? to rebuild its reputation as a credible source of
information or face the onslaught of unsubstantiated, unverified gossip and
rumours turned into facts that pervade the new media.

The rakyat has spoken. They want change. The Prime Minister is beginning to
institute change. The mainstream media is fast changing to rebuild its
influence. And yet, many voices within Umno are pushing for the party?s
self-destruction. I am amazed. For they seem to think that March 8 was just a
blip in Umno?s inherent hegemonic powers. The only change they can think of is
the need to replace the President and, hey presto, everything will be back to
normal.

They think the only reason they lost those seats was because the Umno President
and his family and coterie of advisers chose the wrong candidates and therefore
the Umno machinery failed to deliver the votes.

If only the right candidates were chosen, they would not have lost the four
additional states, the Federal Territory, and their two-thirds majority in
Parliament. Yes, the party President must take the biggest responsibility for
the damning results.

But the massive public repudiation of Barisan Nasional was not just a
repudiation of the Prime Minister?s rule, but of all the corrupt, immoral,
authoritarianism in BN politics and governance in its 50 years of domination.

The public has had enough. But these Umno politicians do not have it in them to
see the writing on the wall.

Nor do they have the confidence, and certainly not the conviction, to deliver on
the palpable demand for change ? change in how they understood, used and abused
power.

They seem to think that a return to sledgehammer rule under a strong leader, an
appeal to Malay racialist sentiment, and spreading the patronage goodies from
bigtime cronies to the divisional level cronies, would just do the trick to win
them support again.

Basically, they want it to be business as usual.

That Pakatan Rakyat won votes on a platform of change from ?ketuanan Melayu? to
?ketuanan rakyat? and a smorgasbord of promises to make democracy and good
governance work for all citizens seems to have escaped these Umno recalcitrants.

While this new alliance is fast capturing the shifting mood of Malaysian voters
to a new political centre of equitable and fairer terms of engagement among the
citizens, and between the citizen and the state, and generating excitement among
young voters and community groups that their voices can indeed bring change,
Umno members are more preoccupied with power grabbing in the run-up to party
elections in December.

They forget the goodies the winners want to lay their grubby hands on might just
be in someone else?s clutches by the next general election.

But what makes Umno politics even more wretched for us looking on from the
outside is the fact that so many calling for leadership change in Umno are
themselves so tainted and discredited.

They might win party elections whooping their ?ketuanan Melayu? battle cry, but
they will cause the party to lose the next general election. The ground has
shifted and they still think the old tricks will deliver them victory.

What is there then for its key Barisan partners to remain in the coalition? They
are already blaming Umno and its arrogant, intemperate and relentless stomping
and condoning of ethno-religious supremacy for driving away Chinese and Indian
voters into the waiting arms of PKR, DAP and PAS.

To now claim that Malay political power is under threat is hubris. It is Umno
that has lost its dominance. As Karim Raslan in his column on April 22 said,
what the Umno leaders don?t want to acknowledge is that their monopoly over the
Malay vote is gone forever.

No, the Malays are not disunited. The Malay community has evolved into a more
complex, sophisticated, diverse community with diverse interests.

There are those who want a democratic and secular Malaysia with justice and
equality as core values; those who want an end to affirmative action that
damaged Malay competitiveness; those who want an Islamic state and syariah rule;
those who want Islam as a source of social values, but not an instrument of
state power; those who want good governance and forget ideology; those who want
an end to racebased politics and political parties; those who want to restore
our rich tradition of embracing and celebrating our cultural and religious
diversity ...

Malaysian politics is taking off into an epochal transformation from race-based
to issue-based.

Increasingly, Malaysians are building new solidarities based on issues, not race
or religion.

Be it human rights, women?s rights, democracy, good governance, freedom of the
press, detention without trial, local government, environment, land rights,
anti-corruption, reviving Malay culture killed by Islamisation ? it is the issue
that will bring Malaysians of all ethnic backgrounds together.

The modernity that development brings can only mean more and more diverse and
differentiated interests. Umno and its Barisan Nasional partners have two
choices before them: evolve or perish.

For the Prime Minister, the priority now is to fulfil the Barisan Nasional
promises of 2004 to bring about a more transparent and accountable government.

He needs to steam ahead to transform Malaysia?s democratic institutions and
structures and begin to undo the damage of Umno and Barisan?s hegemonic rule
over the past decades.

This is the last chance for this government to get it right or else the usual
10-year electoral cycle of ?rise and fall? in the performance of the ruling
party will be broken. It will be the fall and fall.


==============================================
caveat fair use notice:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: 22 questions for Dr M crosses the Causeway
    ... You came to power in 1981 and introduced the slogan bersih, ... Your criticism of the government got plenty of coverage in the local media ... On the first serious Umno split ... transformation, first as education minister in the 1970s, then as prime ...
    (soc.culture.malaysia)
  • Question Time: 22 questions for Mahathir
    ... Question Time: 22 questions for Mahathir ... Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi is only in his third year as Prime Minister but his pre decessor Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad already has four questions for his administration to answer. ... While we would like to hear a better explanation from the government than what has been given so far, Abdullah should not be the only one answeringquestions. ... Musa took on Tun Ghafar Baba and you at the Umno general assembly of 1987, it caused a serious split in Umno, with you winning by a very narrow margin. ...
    (soc.culture.malaysia)
  • 22 questions for Dr M crosses the Causeway
    ... Your criticism of the government got plenty of coverage in the local media whereas, during your time, criticisms against you by two former prime ministers were muted in the mainstream newspapers. ... Why did you encourage a population of 70 million for Malaysia and change the name of the National Family Planning Board to the National Population Development Board? ... When Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah and Musa Hitam took you on and Ghafar Baba at the Umno general assembly of 1987, it caused a serious split in Umno, with you winning by a very narrow margin. ... You presided over the education system at an important part of its transformation, first as education minister in the 1970s, then as prime minister. ...
    (soc.culture.malaysia)
  • What an non-pap government will do for Singaporeans
    ... lky threatened to wake singaporeans up with ... government which will be non-pap will certainly benefit ... PAP has a lot to do with this "Politics of Fear" resulting in PAP getting ... Minister, Ministry Without Portfolio, Minister in the Prime Minister's ...
    (soc.culture.singapore)
  • [nst] When academics and officialdom clash
    ... CRITICISE the Government and face the music. ... Politics, Patronage and Profits, for example, excoriated the ... in particular former Prime Minister Tun Dr ... Running battles between academicians and the Government are nothing new. ...
    (soc.culture.malaysia)