Re: The Indian Question

" really poor in a realistic sense" I quote from your posting. You have raised an interesting point.
Please elaborate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Choong wrote:

These people cannot pull off a revolution, these are lost sheep with the mind of a raging bull. The argument against their stupid action is that in contra to their population of about 8% in Malaysia they are hardly be considered being "oppressed" or are really poor in a realistic sense and the Hindraft hindrance rally saw them acting in incohesion and seemingly aimless in action but nevertheless they mistook every sense of democracy freedom or whats left of it in this country and replaced it with their outright hypocritical expression of showing their true self of anti allegiance the the Constitution of the land and mistook it as an expression of "anti government"., their acts of displaying placards of Indira and Mahatma Ghandhi in this rally clearly showed where they belong unconsciously and by the single act of hosting and hoisting the picture of Queen Elizabeth II is showing their outright stupidity as such move could meant their "love" for the Queen of which they are trying to "sue" in the first place and to cap up all this if they are of any intelligence in regards to their commitment to the situation at hand in this land they should be holding this rally in defiance of the government with the photo placards of the Tunku or Tun Sambanthan.

Stupid see stupid do.

Choong





kingkong wrote:

By Mohandass Karamchand

The Indian protest in Kuala Lumpur has been a great success because it made a very loud noise. But the Indian protesters forgot to shout Daulat Tuanku. Instead they showed allegiance to Queen Elizabeth II by carrying placards that had Queen Elizabeth’s picture. Others also carried pictures of Mahatma Ghandi.

.