Pakistan 'tops death row league'

Pakistan 'tops death row league'

President Musharraf

Amnesty urged President Musharraf to ban executions

Pakistan has more people imprisoned facing execution than any other country in
the world, human rights group Amnesty International says.

Nearly a third of the world's 24,000 death row prisoners are in Pakistan -
"often held in extremely over-crowded conditions", Amnesty says.

Its annual report on the death penalty said the number of people executed in
2006 fell by 25%, compared with 2005.

But Pakistan was one of a few countries where executions rose sharply.

Pakistan's interior minister has dismissed any suggestion of abolishing the
death penalty.

'Grim toll'

The Amnesty report said that at least 1,591 people had been executed in 25
countries last year, compared with 2,148 people in 2005.



Quote:
Capital punishment is always cruel and unnecessary and doesn't deter crime
Kate Allen,
Amnesty International

Death row man's freedom

It said the vast majority of those executed in 2006 were in China (1,010),
followed by Iran (177), Pakistan (82), Iraq (65), Sudan (65) and the US (53).

The figure in Pakistan had nearly trebled from 31 the previous year, Amnesty
said.

The group's UK Director, Kate Allen, said: "Last year saw a slight drop in
execution numbers but it was another grim death toll around the world.

"We are particularly concerned about a disturbing 'revival' of executions in
countries like Iraq, Sudan and Pakistan.

"We urgently need to see 'death penalty governments' issuing bans on all
imminent executions, especially President Musharraf in Pakistan."

However, Pakistani Interior Minister Aftab Khan Sherpao told the BBC: "We have
our own laws, inherited from British times and they are applied very
judiciously.

"We feel that the death sentence is a deterrent, without it maybe there would be
more cases of serious crimes like murders."

Amnesty says 91% of all executions take place in the six countries listed above.
Many are sentenced after torture and unfair trials, the group says.

Amnesty says that more than 7,200 people are on death row in Pakistan, a figure
which was roughly similar six months ago.

But the sharp jump in numbers of people being executed makes this a particularly
deadly combination, the group says.

It criticised death row conditions in Pakistan.

"In some cases 12 death row prisoners are reportedly being held in 4m-by-3m
cells designed for one person," the group said.

It said wealthier convicts were often able to escape execution under laws which
allow relatives of murder victims to accept compensation and pardon the
offender.

Trend 'down'

Amnesty said its execution figures were "minimum only" and that countries like
China killed far more people than official statistics showed.

Briton Mirza Tahir Hussain spent years on Pakistan's death row

But the report did note new safeguards in China meaning that all death sentences
now had to be approved by China's Supreme People's Court.

And it said "the underlying global trend is towards less frequent usage and
lower numbers of death sentences being imposed".

To date 128 countries had abolished the death penalty, with the Philippines the
latest of 30 states to do so in the past 10 years.

"While 69 countries still retain the punishment less than half that number are
currently carrying out executions," the report said.

Executions map 2006

BBC NEWS | South Asia | Pakistan 'tops death row league'

I saw the TV Report also.

Most Asian countries have not banned death penalties.

The Amnesty head Irene Khan stated that death penalty does not decrease crime.

What is your opinion.

1. Does death penalty act as a deterrent or not?

2. Should there be death penalty or not?
Attached Images _42854957_world_executions_map416.gif (22.4 KB, 58 views)

__________________


"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use
Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an
Abomination."

I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

HAKUNA MATATA


Ray
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Ray



04-27-2007, 10:31 PM #2 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor




Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 4,726
Country: Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray
I saw the TV Report also.

Most Asian countries have not banned death penalties.

The Amnesty head Irene Khan stated that death penalty does not decrease crime.

What is your opinion.

1. Does death penalty act as a deterrent or not?

2. Should there be death penalty or not?

Death penalty does not deter crime. Death penalty makes sure the crook never
harms another human being again.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.


gunnut
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by gunnut

04-30-2007, 02:33 PM #3 (permalink)
bonehead
Senior Contributor


Join Date: 01-12-05
Posts: 1,498 The death penalty also keeps the prison guards a bit safer. With
out it, what control does one really have against a lifer. If he kills a guard
do we keep him behind bars a couple more years after he dies? It is good the
prison population knows things can get worse for them if they get out of line.
furthermore, those individuals who have proven themselves to be a grave danger
to society should not have any opportunities to escape.

I am all for letting the accused getting a chance to prove his innocence and the
state must dot all the I's and cross all the T's. Prosecutors and judges should
be held responsible if they do anything not above board. These people should be
greatly punished if they ever knowingly send an innocent man to the gallows.
After the accused had his chance, found guilty by the jury and a sentence of
death given because of his continued threat to society, his time on death row
should be limited to a couple of years at the most, not the decades many have
now.
The method should be the guillotine. It is cheap, effective and quick. If the
criminals complain they only need to be reminded of what they have done to their
victims which got the criminals to where they currently are.


bonehead
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by bonehead

05-02-2007, 03:49 AM #4 (permalink)
Wraith601
Title Classified
Senior Contributor


Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,030
Country: I support the death penalty fully, though I do see the need for
reforms in the way it is administered and how it is sentenced. I am speaking
solely from a US perspective though.
__________________
"God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and
defend it."
? Daniel Webster


Wraith601
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Wraith601

05-02-2007, 02:35 PM #5 (permalink)
Debbie
Contributor




Join Date: 11-21-06
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 612
Country: Here is a deterrent to crime:

If a person steals - chop off hand
If a person kills - be killed by family of person in way they choose
If a person rapes - chop off or suture offending part

Less crime? Up the stakes as to the punishment. The death penalty is not harsh
enough to deter crime.


Debbie
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Debbie

05-02-2007, 02:41 PM #6 (permalink)
pdf27
Contributor




Join Date: 06-05-06
Location: UK
Posts: 392
Country: Quote:
Originally Posted by Debbie
Less crime? Up the stakes as to the punishment. The death penalty is not harsh
enough to deter crime.

Problem is that it appears that most criminals aren't smart enough to think
through the likely results of their crimes. I'm thinking of cases like that guy
in California (?) who got a life sentence for stealing some pizza - he wasn't
bright enough to think through what would happen if he committed that crime, and
so did it anyway. Given that (viewed from the perspective of someone deciding
whether or not to steal a pizza) life imprisonment is an extraordinarily harsh
punishment, it appears that for at least a large fraction of the criminal
fraternity the harshness of a punishment is not that great a deterrent.
__________________
Rule 1: Never trust a Frenchman
Rule 2: Treat all members of the press as French


pdf27
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by pdf27

05-02-2007, 06:03 PM #7 (permalink)
entropy
Patron




Join Date: 03-19-07
Location: Belgium
Posts: 185
Country: Deterrent isn't.
__________________
If memory serves...


entropy
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by entropy

05-05-2007, 06:37 PM #8 (permalink)
ChrisF202
Senior Contributor


Join Date: 08-12-03
Location: West Islip, New York, USA
Posts: 2,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Debbie
Here is a deterrent to crime:

If a person steals - chop off hand
If a person kills - be killed by family of person in way they choose
If a person rapes - chop off or suture offending part

Less crime? Up the stakes as to the punishment. The death penalty is not harsh
enough to deter crime.

I like that ... isent that the basis of Shira law though?


ChrisF202
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by ChrisF202

Yesterday, 03:24 AM #9 (permalink)
globaltracker
Regular




Join Date: 05-10-06
Posts: 57 Quote:
Originally Posted by Debbie
Here is a deterrent to crime:

If a person steals - chop off hand
If a person kills - be killed by family of person in way they choose
If a person rapes - chop off or suture offending part

Less crime? Up the stakes as to the punishment. The death penalty is not harsh
enough to deter crime.

What would be the scenario if the proposed punishments by you is implemented in
a framed up cases, it's not that uncommon. Women frame men in almost any part of
the world for molestation for past grudge or something. Can you give him back
his hand/head/suture offending part. So i don't agree with this sort of crime
preventions.
cheers


globaltracker
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by globaltracker

Yesterday, 04:59 AM #10 (permalink)
Tiger
Banished
New Member


Join Date: 05-05-07
Posts: 17 That would be sad if a hand was chopped off in a framed up case.

Then that hand should embalmed and be kept in a frame and hung in the Judge's
chamber to remind him of his miscarriage of justice!


Tiger
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Tiger

Yesterday, 05:09 AM #11 (permalink)
JAD_333
Regular




Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Posts: 133
Country: Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut
Death penalty does not deter crime. Death penalty makes sure the crook never
harms another human being again.

Valid point. It's a punishment first, a deterrent last.


JAD_333
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JAD_333

Today, 01:30 AM #12 (permalink)
Archer
Senior Contributor




Join Date: 10-13-03
Posts: 2,596 Quote:
Originally Posted by Debbie
Here is a deterrent to crime:

If a person steals - chop off hand
If a person kills - be killed by family of person in way they choose
If a person rapes - chop off or suture offending part

Less crime? Up the stakes as to the punishment. The death penalty is not harsh
enough to deter crime.

Debbie, you'd fit right in with the good folks in Saudi Arabia! Sure you dont
wanna try.
__________________
Karmani Vyapurutham Dhanuhu

My bow is stretched for its task


Archer
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Archer

Today, 03:14 AM #13 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor




Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 4,726
Country: Quote:
Originally Posted by JAD_333
Valid point. It's a punishment first, a deterrent last.

I would argue it isn't even a punishment. It's a public safety precaution.
Here's a defective product (crook). Send it back to the manufacturer so it
doesn't linger around to cause more damage.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.


gunnut
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by gunnut

Today, 03:36 AM #14 (permalink)
JAD_333
Regular




Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Posts: 133
Country: Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut
I would argue it isn't even a punishment. It's a public safety precaution.
Here's a defective product (crook). Send it back to the manufacturer so it
doesn't linger around to cause more damage.

Call it a tie. Getting the criminal off the street is one objective of prison
and returning him reformed is another. If incarceration was purely a matter of
public safety, criminals would never be released.

However, public safety seems uppermost when the sentence is life or death.
Reform is hardly relevent to criminals who have no prospect of release.

worldaffairscom
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: NOT EVEN FASCISTS WERE THIS BRUTAL
    ... and destruction with its own money - its own oil revenues. ... Iraq has become a country where thieves are entrusted with its ... The war on Iraq was not carried out on the basis of mere strategic ... No strategies or interests could explain the level of death ...
    (soc.culture.singapore)
  • Re: are you a good Democrat?
    ... > don't bother to inform their kids about contraception. ... But if this country doesn't provide federal funding for the arts ... > honestly think OJ would have been sentenced to death if he had been ... >> the Constitution, while the ACLU is good, because it supports certain ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
  • Re: Rumsfeld Comments on the recent WMD report.
    ... occurred are the same countries who won't return a civilian murderer to ... the US because of the death penalty....Are these crimes any different? ... If the jury can't decide the death penalty isn't ... another country then punishment would be up to that countries laws. ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: OT..british terror plot
    ... populated areas, the death of civilians in not on us, but on those hiding ... you're responsible for what your country does in your ... death of 30,000 people as "not our fault". ... your hands of responsibility, but you can't fool me into the same. ...
    (alt.vacation.las-vegas)
  • California sees no acceleration in executions
    ... State sees no acceleration in executions ... death in a little more than two months in California. ... Five other condemned prisoners could run out of appeals in 2007, ... when public support for the death penalty ...
    (alt.true-crime)