Why Do We Hate Them?



Why Do We Hate Them?
Fear and Loathing In The Occident
By Jason Miller
8-17-6


Islamophobia is a mental and spiritual affliction. And our Western
ruling elites bear the responsibility for inflicting it upon the psyches of
the masses.

Now that the Stalinist/Maoist regimes have collapsed or evolved
toward capitalism and no fascist states with imperial ambitions exist
(besides the United States and its few allies), the American Empire needed
to find a new "enemy" to replace Stalinists and Nazis. Much of the soft
power employed by the leaders of America's "top down democracy" stems from
psychological manipulation of "the mob". Mobilization of the masses against
a common enemy "threatening the very existence of the American Way" has long
been a staple in the United States' ruling elites' ongoing push to
monopolize the world's wealth, power, and prestige.

And who better to vilify than Islamic people? Many are dark-skinned
and live in developing nations, meaning their lives are inconsequential in
the prevailing moral calculus of the West. The Middle East is predominately
Islamic, its sands are oozing with crude oil, and it is home to Israel. From
the perspective of the Empire, what better region to target than the Middle
East?

And whether one believes that 9/11 was a false flag operation
perpetrated by the US government or the work of radical Islamic
Fundamentalists, the members of the Bush Regime obviously shed their
crocodile tears publicly while privately celebrating the event as their
Pearl Harbor. 3,000 civilian deaths and the demolition of a powerful symbol
of the Western "value" of avaricious Capitalism whipped the American public
into a furor against the "evil Muslims" who "hate our freedoms".

Never mind the fact that the United States and Israel have
undertaken a nearly unparalleled program of military aggression and ethnic
cleansing throughout the Middle East since the formation of the illegitimate
colonial nation in Palestine. Given the premises for founding Israel,
someone needs to remind Great Britain and the United States that it is
incumbent upon them to create a homeland for homosexuals and Romani people.
After all, they were also Holocaust victims and are people without a nation.
And like the Palestinians, the other inhabitants of the Middle East are more
akin to animals than human beings. So why not establish two more colonies on
their land?

On August 13, Sixty Minutes aired a segment that revealed a great
deal about Islamophobia and the role the corporate media plays in its
proliferation.

In his recent open letter to Mike Wallace, Michael K. Smith
declared:

Your interview with Iranian Prime Minister Ahmadinejad was a
disgrace to the journalistic profession. You began with the condescending
manner of a school principal lecturing the class clown for immature behavior
and squandered the entire interview on hypocritically accusatory questions.
If gall were an Olympic sport, you'd take the Gold Medal.

Michael made some fine points throughout his letter. However, I
opine that he was too generous when he called Wallace's vituperative verbal
assault an interview. What I witnessed was Mike Wallace, the Ugly American.
Brimming with contempt, impatience, hubris, and belligerence, he more
closely resembled the Grand Inquisitor than a journalist.

Did Wallace truly fail to grasp that he was acting as an apologist
and cheerleader for bellicose, heartless, and ruthless perpetrators of war
crimes on behalf of Israel, and thus is a Zionist (as Ahmadinejad
suggested)? Through its grossly biased coverage of the "War on Terrorism"
and mindless perpetuation of the inane myth that Israel has the right to
annihilate an unlimited number of civilians to protect its "right to exist",
CBS News has joined the squad of corporate media cheerleaders which has been
shamelessly complicit in the Empire's egregious crimes against humanity. I
submit that one can be a Zionist and a journalist. Mike Wallace is living
proof.

Yet in spite of Wallace's tenacious efforts, the "devil incarnate",
Ahmadinejad, remained composed. At times Ahmadinejad seemed to thoroughly
enjoy Wallace's obvious "flustration" in attacking him from what has become
an absurdly untenable position, both morally and logically. For those of us
who don't believe the Western media fairy tale that the United States is a
force for good engaged in a noble struggle in its bid to rid the world of
the evil of Islam and defend Israel's "right to exist", Wallace's ill-fated
attempt to expose the malevolence of the "enemy" was quite entertaining.

Just as Wallace scrambled madly in a hopeless attempt to prevail
intellectually in his interrogation of Ahmadinejad, the debt-ridden, aging
American Empire and its allies are flailing wildly in a desperate attempt to
claim military victory in the Middle East. And like Ahmadinejad, those who
comprise the resistance to occupation and exploitation in the Middle East
are facing down their occupiers with a deft persistence, filled with a
confidence born from the knowledge that recent history has not been kind to
imperial invaders facing a people determined to expel them (i.e. Vietnam,
Lebanon, and Iraq).

In the perverse worldview of the Neocons, Israel, and AIPAC, Iran is
considered to be a part of the "Axis of Evil". Since Wallace championed the
cause of the "benevolent" United States in his Sixty Minutes interrogation
of the leader of one of the members of the "Axis", it is instructive to
consider the "evils" Iran and resistance groups like Hamas and Hezbollah
have perpetrated.

While various resistance groups in the Middle East have certainly
committed war crimes by killing civilians, the "leader of the free world"
and its counterpart in Palestine have annihilated hundreds of thousands more
civilians than have the so-called "terrorists".

Yes, militant Fundamentalist Islamic individuals wield much of the
power in Iran. But let's put on our thinking caps to discern how that
situation evolved. In 1979 hard-line anti-American Islamic clerics assumed
control of the Iranian government when they ousted the Shah (the corrupt US
puppet who tortured and killed tens of thousands of Iranian "dissidents"
during his reign of terror). Ironically, the Iranian government the United
States loves to hate exists because the CIA and MI6 facilitated the Shah
taking power from Mohammed Mossadegh in 1953. The significance? Mossadegh
was a democratically-elected secular prime minister who had had the audacity
to nationalize the oil industry because the British oil companies were
grossly exploiting the Iranian people. By acting in typical fashion (by
taking out a populist leader and replacing him with a vicious tyrant), the
United States provided an incubator for powerful anti-American sentiment.
Thus the United States and Great Britain are responsible for the theocracy
in Iran which they fear and despise.

Corporate media pundits like Michelle Malkin and Anne Coulter are
the vanguards in spreading pernicious distortions which fan the rapidly
spreading emotional flames of fear, prejudice, and hatred comprising
Islamophobia. Two of the most disturbing and inflammatory perversions of the
truth the Western media entities disseminate are that all adherents of the
Islamic faith are radical fundamentalists and that Sharia Law is universally
harsh and grossly inferior to the Empire's system (which provides "liberty
and justice for all").

Just as Christianity encompasses a broad spectrum of people with
varying ways of practicing and expressing their faith, the Islamic world is
filled with human beings who have diverse ways of expressing their religious
beliefs. There are liberal, moderate, and Fundamentalist Muslims. And
surprising as it may seem, most practitioners of Fundamentalist Islam, like
most Fundamentalist Christians, are essentially peaceful individuals. In
fact, a Muslim truly following the tenets of Islam practices moderation and
tolerance. Many Muslims are no more willing to strap plastic explosives to
their belts for a suicide mission than most Christians would be to bomb an
abortion clinic. There are radicals from both religions, but they are very
much in the minority.

Another lie deeply embedded in the barrage of communications we
receive from the Western corporate media is that the United States and its
allies are morally superior to the "evil Muslims". One aspect of Islam they
offer as "proof" of this faulty conclusion is that many Islamic nations
incorporate Sharia into their legal systems. While Sharia can involve harsh
and rigid forms of justice, it exists to varying degrees in the many Muslim
nations around the globe. Judiciaries in Islamic nations manifest the
influence of Sharia in ways that span the spectrum from extremely dogmatic
to highly secular and liberal.

While the Western media's blistering criticism of the more draconian
actions of some Islamic nations (i.e. Iran's execution of teenagers) is
definitely warranted, the Empire has a great deal of house-cleaning to do
before it is in a position to preach to other nations on human rights
issues.

Here are but a few recent examples of the United States' own
flagrant human rights abuses:

1. carrying out quite a number of its own executions in a manner
recently discovered to inflict a great deal of suffering on the victim

2. routinely torturing and suspending justice for suspected "enemy
combatants"

3. funding the Israeli Apartheid and ethnic cleansing of the
Palestinians

4. occupying a nation where it has killed over a million Iraqi
civilians since the Gulf War invasion (through brutal economic sanctions and
military actions).

5. funding the Israeli devastation of Lebanon

6. supporting numerous ruthless and murderous regimes (as long as
they are friendly to US corporations)

7. having cynically embraced Saddam Hussein as an ally (knowing of
his crimes against humanity) when it furthered US interests and invading
Iraq preemptively to topple him when he ceased to be useful.

8. having kept the House of Saud in power for years despite its
harsh practice of Sharia (i.e. thieves' hands are severed and adulterers are
stoned).

9. maintaining the largest prison population in the world through a
legal system so unjust that 50% of those incarcerated are Black when Blacks
comprise 14% of the general population.

10. engaging in numerous outright massacres of civilians (i.e.
Haditha, Fallujah)

In light of the above, how long will it be before a significant
portion of the Muslim population falls prey to an extreme prejudice against
all Westerners called Anglo-Christophobia? Let's hope it does not happen any
time soon.

Speaking of Christians (at least the Fundamentalist ones), their
demonization of Islam is actually rather amusing. Christian Fundamentalists
share more common ground with the extreme members of the Islamic faith than
they perhaps realize. Some Muslim nations treat homosexuality as a crime.
Abortion is illegal in virtually every circumstance throughout much of the
Middle East. Separation of church and state does not exist in nations like
Iran. Implementation of the death penalty is common in the Middle East. How
can men like John Hagee reconcile their cognitive dissonance in advocating
war against Iran, a model of the theocracy they strive to implement in the
United States?

CBS, Mike Wallace and the rest of the United States' corporate media
can continue to do the Empire's bidding from now until the world comes to an
end (which may not be as far away as I make it sound if sanity and humanity
do not prevail over greed, ignorance, and hatred). However, their nearly
endless bombardment of intelligently crafted lies readily distributed to
nearly every corner of the globe are powerless to alter the truth.

In truth, Israeli and American lives are no more precious than those
of the Arab and Persian human beings populating the Middle East. And neither
the United States/Israel/Great Britain nor the nations and groups comprising
the resistance in the Middle East are innocent of the deep transgression of
murdering innocents. Each nation or group also commits human rights abuses
against its own people in some fashion. However, Western exploiters and
invaders are culpable of far more frequent and grievous war crimes than the
Middle Easterners who are defending themselves, their resources, and their
people.

If the majority of the human beings controlling the corporate media
had a shred of moral decency they would focus their efforts on informing
their viewers, listeners, and readers of the vast number of war crimes
committed by Israel and the United States. They would start portraying the
"terrorists" as the resistors of oppression they truly are. They would make
a distinction between the various Middle Eastern resistance groups'
legitimate attacks on their occupiers' militaries and the war crimes they
commit against civilians. And they would devote most of their remaining
substantial resources to the inundation of news consumers with stories,
photos and video footage depicting the tragic and gruesome civilian
suffering and death.

As it is, the Western corporate media shamelessly serve the Neocons
by perpetuating a virtually endless cycle of hatred and violence. They
incite and feed Islamophobia and they fabricate a plethora of false
justifications for the malevolent actions of Israel and the United States.
But then in a fascist nation, corporations are wedded with the state,
militarism is the state's primary focus, scapegoats and enemies are
essential, and the function of the Fourth Estate is to provide the
propaganda to control the masses.

Just imagine if the mainstream media in the United States actually
began fulfilling its role (in what is ostensibly a free society) and acted
as a check on our government rather than its accomplice. If more Americans
knew more truth, instead of hating Islamic people and pushing to intensify
the war in the Middle East, the masses would be demanding that reason,
justice, and peace prevail. They would demand that the United States
completely withdraw its military from the Middle East and leave Israel to
stand on its own, which would force the Israelis to finally settle the
Palestinian issue in a just manner and to cooperate with their neighbors as
equals.

If the major media entities of the West were living up to their
responsibilities as members of the Fourth Estate, perhaps 3 year old Ali
Ahmad Hashim of Qana would not have been bombed to death, the members of the
Ghalia family would not have been obliterated on a Gaza beach, 76 year old
wheel-chair bound amputee Abdul Hamid Hassan Ali would not have been
massacred at Haditha, Cindy Sheehan would not be grieving for a son lost to
a war of imperial aggression, and Reuven Levy of Haifa would not have been
annihilated by a rocket attack as he was doing his job for Israel Railways.

I am not holding my breath waiting for money-driven enablers of war
like Rupert Murdoch to start heeding the advice of Jiminy Cricket. However,
I will not succumb to their assault of malicious distortions. I refuse to
fear, hate, or consider myself at war with 20% of the world's population
simply because they choose to follow the teachings of the Qur'an.

Islamophobia is an intellectual and spiritual malignancy. Reason and
humanity are the cures.


Jason Miller is a 39 year old sociopolitical essayist with a degree
in liberal arts and an extensive self-education (derived from an insatiable
appetite for reading). He welcomes responses at willpowerful@xxxxxxxxxxx or
comments on his blog, Thomas Paine's Corner, at
http://civillibertarian.blogspot.com/.



.



Relevant Pages

  • AMERICAN STRATEGY AND THE MIDDLE EAST
    ... The New America Foundation American Strategy Program ... AMERICAN STRATEGY AND THE MIDDLE EAST ... The first is that today, for the United States, its policy in the Middle ... neo-cons in this country and there are other equivalents in Israel as well. ...
    (soc.culture.polish)
  • quiz
    ... Brigadier General Says Israel is the problem not Iraq ... Which country alone in the Middle East has nuclear weapons? ... lobby in the United States, according to a recent Fortune magazine ...
    (soc.culture.romanian)
  • Brigadier General Says Israel is the problem not Iraq
    ... Brigadier General Says Israel is the problem not Iraq ... Which country alone in the Middle East has nuclear weapons? ... lobby in the United States, according to a recent Fortune magazine ...
    (soc.culture.israel)
  • Countries want U.S. labeled as terrorist nation
    ... HAVANA -- Iran, Syria, North Korea and more than 100 other nations are ... A draft of the group's joint declaration condemns "terrorism in all its ... makes no comments about Hizballah's missile attacks on Israel. ... which is backed by the United States. ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
  • Israel A Danger
    ... What country in the Middle East is in violation of more than 60 United ... The answer to all of the above is Israel. ... New Jersey pose any threat to the United States? ...
    (soc.culture.palestine)