Re: Why do Malaysians continue to live in denial?


pluto wrote:
> "On 11 Jan 2006 16:25:11 -0800, "cksf" <ck_in_sf1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote/and/or
> quoted:
>
> kcksf, you speaking to me?
> if so , this is my input
> if not please ignore.

I will soon if you carry on with such ridiculous shenanigans.

> "
> >Why tell the poster to "Keluar dari Malaysia"?
> k cksf
> if you read my response properly i am "responding " from an average malay
> man on the street's point of view, not a thinking malay man in this
> newsgroup.

No you were not. You are being rude and crude.

> even that, some "thinking man" may not respond cogently.

I doubt if you were thinking at all.

> the "Keluar dari Malaysia" is requote of the bn backbencher .... pl see the
> hansrad or the video from mkini.

But you didn't allude to this in your posting. And now you are telling
me you are using the same tactic as another? Two wrongs do not make a
right.

Shame!

> >
> >The issues raised and the tone of the language are not odious. Perhaps
> >we should be more hospitable to those who see problems in our society
> >and raise the issue we often dare not talk about?
>
> yes, the original writer is polite and not racist in his lamentaions.
> you note i quote "Keluar dari Malaysia" practically every paragraph?
> NOTE I QUOTE
> NOT I SAY.


Oh please ... what is next?

"*** wit" ... please not the quotation mark ... my, my ... is it My
for Malaysia or simple your my?

Next thing I guess you were posting this for your own use? LOL

The problem is with your uncommon use of quotes and abbreviations along
with language.

Oi ... "bodoh" ... of course I was not refering to you.

>
> >
> >Sometimes, I wonder if you are sane or simply a xenophobe who hide
> >behind the veneeer of "impartial" patriot.
> if you have read and understood the charatisation of the "average answer
> from the malay in the street" , your above paragraph is non sequitor.

Ah ... you know non-sequitur ? LOL

Honey ... come to the table when you are ready.

> k cksf, i do wish you would point who you are speaking to.
> in this post, i am the first one responding to the original writer and you
> immediately follow on my post.
> so i presume you are speaking to me
> in other posts where the thread has reached some depths, i elect to ignore
> not out of disrespect to you, but not to go off the point as in your last
> post was actually to k adchin and not to me and it was the good k adchin
> who clarified and you did not bother to answer.

LOL ... now you know the angst of non conformance right?


>
> is it very difficult to configure your newsreader to reply refering to the
> writer you wish to write to?
>
>

I guess to you ... "*** wit" ...???

CKSF

.

Loading