Re: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/45399
- From: "Riglin" <Riglin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:02:32 +0800
"ardeedee" <ardeedee1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43c28f4c$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> They have to be circumcised - taking their time like into the next century
> or the next month?
That's up to the converted person. He can do it whenever he feels he is
ready.
> You just got exposed as a fraud so stop barking up the wrong tree you one
> testicled mule.
>
What fraud are you talking about, oh ignorant fool?
> "Riglin" <Riglin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:43c27f33$1_1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "ardeedee" <ardeedee1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:43c13086$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> > That is why most other forummers did not raise this point - all Muslims
>> > need
>> > to be circumcised either just at puberty or upon converting.
>> > Just goes to show that you keep proving you are ignorant.
>> >
>>
>> Look at how an ignorant fool twists his way out when cornered.
>>
>> Learn this now, a convert does not need to be circumcised at the moment
>> of
>> his conversion to Islam. He can take his own sweet time to do it.
>>
>> Don't be an ignorant fool and jump to your own conclusion without much
>> knowledge of the topic.
>>
>>
>>
>> > "Riglin" <Riglin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > news:43c0efc4_2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>
>> >> "ardeedee" <ardeedee1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> news:43c0899c$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >
>> >> > I told you your mouth bigger than your brains - if this guy had
>> > converted
>> >> > to
>> >> > Muslim he must have undergone sunat - circumcision - and hence his
> wife
>> >> > who
>> >> > must have slept with him or if she did not, must have bathed him -
>> >> > he
>> > was
>> >> > incapacitated - at some time to do her wifely duties - she would
> have
>> >> > known
>> >> > that he was circumcised and different as when she first married
>> >> > him
>> > and
>> >> > would have guessed or asked him whether he had turned Muslim.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Okay, I've checked and Moorthy's wife said he is not circumcised. So,
>> >> according to your logic, he is not a Muslim. Do tell us, is your mouth
>> >> bigger or your brain is small?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Fact that she did not know about his change of foreskin status means
>> >> > she
>> >> > did
>> >> > not do her wifely duties thoughout his incapacity and has no right
> to
>> >> > claim
>> >> > her rights as a wife to determine how he should be buried now that
>> >> > he
>> >> > is
>> >> > dead.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Talking about fact, the fact is how did you know about Moorthy's
>> >> change
>> >> of
>> >> foreskin status?
>> >> Have you been sleeping with him? That's why you claim that his wife
>> > doesn't
>> >> know?
>> >> LOL
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Choong Keat Yian" <sunrock@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> > news:43bf887b$1_1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> arsedeedee, some of my Chinaman friends also circumsize on their
> own,
>> > so
>> >> >> this means they are easy target for those towelhead when they die?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Choong
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ardeedee wrote:
>> >> >> > They checked his prick and he had been circumcised and when his
> wife
>> >> >> > was
>> >> >> > asked she did not know about it.
>> >> >> > Case closed - they should have fed you the piece of foreskin they
>> >> > snipped
>> >> >> > off.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > "pluto" <pluto@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> >> > news:g3usr1ht99pl3521s6nep0q07knrqv91d0@xxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>the onus of proving that moorthy is a muslim lies with the
>> >> >> >>shariah
>> >> >> >>court
>> >> >> >>lawyer who appeared in the civil high court.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>he did not produce any tangible evidence
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>he just said the hihh court judge has no jurisdiction in this
> case.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>and the judge take the lawyer's word !!!
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>my contention is the shariah court lawyer should show evidential
>> > proof
>> >> > of
>> >> >> >>the case
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>then there is no need for this
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/45399
- From: ardeedee
- Re: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/45399
- References:
- http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/45399
- From: pluto
- Re: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/45399
- From: ardeedee
- Re: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/45399
- From: Choong Keat Yian
- Re: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/45399
- From: ardeedee
- Re: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/45399
- From: Riglin
- Re: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/45399
- From: ardeedee
- Re: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/45399
- From: Riglin
- Re: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/45399
- From: ardeedee
- http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/45399
- Prev by Date: Re: 100 000 parki workers for msia
- Next by Date: Re: 100 000 parki workers for msia
- Previous by thread: Re: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/45399
- Next by thread: Re: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/45399
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|