[ot]Emergence of New Potential Geo-political and Geo-strategic Triangular



http://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/18159
Emergence of New Potential Geo-political and Geo-strategic Triangular
by Mehmood-Ul-Hassan Khan
(Monday August 22 2005)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"They fear the United States. They need each other. They are allying
geo-strategically and geo-politically to dominant the whole Asia and
imperil America. They are China, Iran and Russia. It seems that power game
has been started."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Right from the beginning of human civilization, ?power? has had been
playing vital role in the formation of a tribe, society or a country. The
lust to gain more power has been the hallmark of modern political history
too. Country needs to have power in order to counter the greater power
?Dracula? and that merciless process goes on and on. Conflicting
geo-political demands and geo-strategic compulsions use to force countries
to search a ?Safe Heaven? on earth. In the game of power principles have no
meaning and matter of ?Survival? dictates the songs of democracy, human
rights, justice, global brotherhood, and the last not the least
international peace. It is bitter reality that power does justify all the
ill intentions and wrong doings of a power-holder. In the rapidly changing
regional and global geo-political and geo-strategic scenarios the risen
?Economic Power? China, the ?Old Lion? Russia and ?Troubled and Next
Target? of USA i.e. Iran are becoming closer and closer not merely to boast
their respective economies but to counter the predominance military
existence of USA in the region.

Regional And Global Reaction Towards Unilateral Superpower Phobia Of USA

In the every corner of the world, people and countries alike are afraid of
the unilateral superpower phobia of USA. From Bulgaria to Romania,
Azerbaijan to, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan to Turkey, Georgia to, Algeria and
Nigeria to Afghanistan and the last not the least Iraq the hectic military
deployment and establishment of new bases of the USA especially after the
9/11 has created colossal geo-political and geo-strategic changes. The most
significant of these changes is the emergence of possible new geo-political
and geo-strategic triangle of China, Iran and Russia.

Growing Geo-Political and Geo-Strategic Alliance Between China and Russia

The ties between Beijing and Moscow are on the rise. It got momentum in the
past 18 months, which is of course an important geo-political and
geo-strategic development in the region mostly unnoticed in the west. Wen
Jiabao the prime minister of China visited Russia in September 2004. In
October 2004, Vladimir Putin the President of Russia visited China. It has
now recognized in international power politics that Sino-Russian relations
have reached unparalleled heights, which is supposed to be potential
geo-strategic threat to US expansionist policy. Long-standing territorial
issues between the two countries have been settled amicably. Both of the
countries agreed to hold joint military exercises in 2005. That stages the
first large-scale military exercises between Russia and China since 1958.
The joint military exercises complement a rapidly growing arms trade
between Moscow and Beijing. China is Russia's largest buyer of military
equipment. In 2004, China was reported to have signed deals worth more than
$2 billion for Russian arms. These included naval ships and submarines,
missile systems and aircraft. In the past five years, non-military trade
between Russia and China has increased at an average annual rate of nearly
20%. Moscow and Beijing have targeted non-military trade to reach $60
billion by 2010, from $20 billion in 2004.

Economic Cooperation Between China and Russia

According to latest available economic data, ninety-five percent of
Russia's exports to China are energy resources, while China's exports to
Russia primarily are value-added industrial products. Both countries can
extend the bilateral trade from today's US$20 billion to $80 billion per
year. In early 2005, Moscow agreed to more than double electricity exports
to China, to 800 million kilowatt hours kWh, by 2006. In October 2004, the
China National Petroleum Corporation [CNPC] and Russia's Gazprom signed a
series of agreements intended to study how Russia can best supply natural
gas to China. At the same time, Russia signed specific agreements with
China on oil exports.

Russia's oil shipments to China are slated to reach 10 million tons in
2005, increasing to 15 million tons in 2006. All of these shipments will be
made by rail. However, this agreement was overshadowed by talks concerning
the construction of an oil pipeline from Siberia to northern China. Russia
has been pondering an oil pipeline to China for nearly 10 years. In 2002,
plans for this pipeline received a boost when Moscow pledged to invest $2
billion in an oil pipeline running from the Siberian city of Angarsk to
Daqing in northeastern China.

Enhanced Geo-Political and Geo-Strategic Ties between China and Iran

Iran and China stand at the center of Middle Eastern and East Asian
international subsystems where influence reverberates across the globe. The
U.S. condemnation of Iran and China has resulted in both intra-regional and
interregional alliances featuring Iran and China at the center of
concentric circles of countries that resent and resist U.S. hegemony.

Beijing and Tehran signed a mega pipeline project of worth $100 billion in
2003-04. Billed as the "deal of century" by various commentators, this
agreement is likely to increase by another $50 billion to $100 billion,
bringing the total close to $200 billion, when a similar oil agreement,
currently being negotiated, is inked not too far from now. In March 2004,
China's state-owned oil trading company, Zhuhai Zhenrong Corporation,
signed a 25-year deal to import 110 million tons of liquefied natural gas
[LNG] from Iran. This was followed by a much larger deal between another of
China's state-owned oil companies, Sinopec, and Iran, signed in October
2004. This deal, worth about $100 billion, allows China to import a further
250 million tons of LNG from Iran's Yadavaran oilfield over a 25-year
period. In addition to LNG, the Yadavaran deal provides China with 150,000
barrels per day of crude oil over the same period. United States
increasingly pointing at China as the next biggest challenge to its Pax
Americana, the Iran-China energy cooperation cannot but be interpreted as
an ominous sign of emerging new trends in an area considered vital to US
national interests.

The huge deal also enlists substantial Chinese investment in Iranian energy
exploration, drilling and production as well as in petrochemical and
natural gas infrastructure. Total Chinese investment targeted toward Iran's
energy sector could exceed a further $100 billion over 25 years. At the end
of 2004, China became Iran's top oil export market. Apart from the oil and
natural gas delivery contracts, the massive investment being undertaken by
China's state-owned oil companies in Iran's energy sector contravenes the
US Iran-Libya Sanctions Act. This law penalizes foreign companies for
investing more than $20 million in either Libya or Iran.

Decisive Factors Behind the Emergence of Possible Triangular among China,
Russia and Iran

Since the beginning of the war in Iraq, China has worked agitatedly to
strengthen its ties with Moscow and Teheran in a systematic attempt to
check the increasing unwanted military influence and presence of US in the
region. In addition to recent massive energy deals with Teheran, which
place Iran in China's security web, both Beijing and Moscow have
accelerated the transfer of missile technology to Teheran. China's
increasingly close ties with Moscow and Tehran will thwart Washington's
foreign policy goal of expanding US security footholds in the Middle East,
Central Asia and Asia.

Emerging Geo-Political and Geo-Strategic Friendship Between Russia and Iran

Despite U.S. preferences, Russia has entered into numerous political,
economic, military and cultural agreements with Iran. Russian cooperation
with Iran in the fields of nuclear energy, military weaponry, and trade and
commerce has been roundly criticized by the United States. In this
instance, Washington has failed to change either Iranian or Russian
behavior. Instead, the opposite trend continues to develop. The more
pressure exerted by the United States, the closer Russia moves toward Iran.

Land Mark Visit of Iranian President to Russia

In March 2001, Iranian president Muhammad Khatami made a landmark trip to
Russia, where the two countries established an unprecedented number of new
bilateral agreements. Khatami was the first Iranian leader to visit Moscow
since before the revolution, and he did so at the express invitation of
President Vladimir Putin. President Khatami's visit resulted in a Russian
promise to complete the Busehr nuclear power plant and to provide Iran with
advanced conventional weapons. The United States complained sharply to
Russia about the transfer of military technology to Iran. Iran and Russia
responded by pointing out that the agreements were in the best interests of
the region because they would help build stability in the Persian Gulf.
Given the strengthening relations between Iran and important world actors
such as Russia and China, the United States has found itself increasingly
alone.

Military and Nuclear Cooperation Between Russia and Iran

Moscow, has supplied Tehran with advanced missiles and missile technology
since the mid-1980s. In addition to anti-ship missiles like the Silkworm,
China has sold Iran surface-to-surface cruise missiles and, along with
Russia, assisted in the development of Iran's long-range ballistic
missiles. This assistance included the development of Iran's Shihab-3 and
Shihab-4 missiles, with a range of about 2,000 kilometers. Iran is also
reportedly developing missiles with ranges approaching 3,000 kilometers.
After much wrangling and repeated US intervention, Russia and Iran finally
signed, in February 2005 a deal clearing the way for the shipment of
Russian nuclear fuel to Iran's nuclear power plant at Bushehr. Washington's
primary concern about Bushehr is the intended use of the plant's spent
nuclear fuel. This fuel can be discarded, reprocessed, or used in the
manufacture of weapons-grade plutonium. In an effort to assure Washington
that the last of these three possibilities will not come to pass, Moscow
has promised that all the spent fuel from Bushehr will be returned to
Russia.

China was also believed to be producing several new types of guided
anti-ship missiles for Iran in 2004. China and Russia's sales of missiles
and missile technology as well as missile development assistance contravene
the US-Iran non-proliferation act of 2000. This act specifically states
that sanctions will be "imposed on countries whose companies provide
assistance to Iran in its efforts to acquire weapons of mass destruction
and missile delivery systems.

The most compelling aspect of this alliance is revealed in China's and
Russia's support for Iran's much-maligned nuclear energy program. The Putin
has consistently maintained that Russia would not support UN Security
Council resolutions that condemn Iran's nuclear energy program or apply
economic sanctions against Iran. Beijing has echoed Moscow's opposition to
UN action against Iran. After concluding the historic gas and oil deal
between China and Iran in October 2004, China's Foreign Minister Li
Zhaoxing announced that China would not support UN Security Council action
against Iran's nuclear energy program. Opposition in Moscow and Beijing to
UN action against Iran is significant because both countries hold UN
Security Council veto power.

Possible Consequences Of Emerging Triangular, China, Russia And Iran and
USA

The endorsement of Tehran's nuclear energy program by Moscow and Beijing is
supposed to be resultant of the China-Iran-Russia geo-political and
geo-strategic triangular, which is to counter US ?unilateralism? and global
?hegemonic intentions?. By that systematic action China and Russia wants to
minimize US influence in Asia, Central Asia and the Middle East. The joint
statement issued at the conclusion of Putin's state visit to China in
October 2004 was a clear indication of Beijing and Moscow's detestation of
the Bush administration's unilateral foreign policy. Meanwhile the United
States has tightened its control of the Middle East, Central Asia,
Southeast Asia and Northeast Asia. It testifies that Washington's
anti-terror campaign has already gone beyond the scope of self-defense.

Along with energy trade, investment and economic development, the
China-Iran-Russia alliance has cultivated compatible foreign policies.
China, Iran and Russia have identical foreign policy positions regarding
Taiwan and Chechnya. China and Iran fully support the Putin government's
war against the Chechen separatists. Russia and Iran support Beijing's
one-China policy. The recent promulgation of China's anti-secession law,
aimed at making Beijing's intolerance of Taiwanese independence explicit,
was heartily commended in both Moscow and Tehran.

Democratization of Middle East and Views of China, Russia and Iran


To China and Russia, Washington's democratic reform program is a thinly
disguised method for the US to militarily dispose of unfriendly regimes in
order to ensure the country's primacy as the world's sole superpower. The
China-Iran-Russia alliance can be considered as Beijing's and Moscow's
counterpunch to Washington's global ambitions. From this perspective, Iran
is integral to thwarting the Bush administration's foreign policy goals.
This is precisely why Beijing and Moscow have strengthened their economic
and diplomatic ties with Tehran. It is also why Beijing and Moscow are
providing Tehran with increasingly sophisticated weapons.

Similarities among China, Russia and Iran

On the road to their respective national histories, all the countries has
had been trapped by USA. Nominally democratic Russia, Communist China and
so-called militantly Muslim Iran have more in common than is generally
assumed. They are close Asian neighbors. China and Iran share borders with
Russia. China, Russia and Iran can move swiftly. Currently, three countries
are experiencing an economic upturn. Iran from its immense oil resources,
China from its booming economy and Russia with its economy foundering
portray an ideal geo-political and geo-strategic triangular. Russia has
technology and military weapons that China and Iran lack and are willing to
spend their cash to obtain. The three are being drawn into a common
demand-and-supply partnership. Above all, they share resentment and fear of
the United States.

Great Power Game is on

In the game of power nothing is for granted. One has to enjoy the out
coming of power phenomena and be ready to face all the short and long terms
geo-political and geo-strategic consequences. Deepening economic and
security among China, Iran and Russia could eventually reduce Washington's
influence in the region to Afghanistan and Central Asia. To counter the
increasing geo-strategic alliances in the region Washington plans on
building another six military bases in Central Asia, further amplifying the
US military threat to China, Russia and Iran. East Asia is another region
where the China-Iran-Russia alliance/triangular has common interests
diametrically opposed to Washington's. North Korea is happy on the
emergence of new geo-political and geo-strategic triangular in the region.
The mutual antagonism by Iran and North Korea of the US has naturally
brought these two countries together. North Korea has been an integral
supplier to Iran's ballistic missile program over the past 15 years.

More importantly, Pyongyang and Beijing are tied together by a mutual
security agreement. North Korea is an important security buffer for both
China and Russia against US military projection in Asia. With Beijing and
Moscow clearly in accord about countering Washington's global hegemonic
aspirations, neither country is likely to sell out their relations with
North Korea and this security buffer. More likely, Beijing and Moscow would
like to bolster the security buffer in the light of expanding US
militarism.

Beginning of Counter-Offensive Power Game of China and Russia against USA

In 2004, Russia and China launched a counter-offensive to the expansion of
US militarism in Asia. Beijing and Moscow began to court Latin America's
New Leftist governments. Both China and Russia have strengthened relations
with Venezuela a new enemy of USA. In November 2004, Moscow agreed to sell
Caracas as many as 30 combat helicopters and 100,000 automatic rifles to
Venezuela. In addition, Venezuela is considering the purchase of up to 50
MiG-29 fighter jets from Russia to replace aging F-16s.

The Russia-Venezuela arms deal was widely criticized in Washington. Both
Donald Rumsfeld and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice have voiced strong
opposition to the deal. In late 2004, Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez
visited Beijing, where he signed several oil sector investment deals with
the China National Petroleum Corporation. Chavez has also stated that he
would like to give oil export preference to China rather than the US. China
also signed significant energy-related investment deals with Brazil,
Ecuador and Argentina in 2004. The willingness of Beijing and Moscow to
challenge US security so close to home clearly indicates that a
geo-political and geo-strategic battle has begun.


Conclusion


Every country in the region and around the globe is making all possible
arrangements to avoid the wrath of USA the Untamed Elephant. Russia is not
at ease with all the moves USA taken after the 9/11. US incursions in its
traditional Caucasus-Central Asian turf have made it angry. The increasing
ties of USA with South Korea and Taiwan and unfinished trade war on textile
issue along with Arms Embargo has forced China to take all necessary steps
of geo-political and geo-strategic natures to successfully counter the ill
designs of USA.



Source:



by courtesy & © 2005 Mehmood-Ul-Hassan Khan

=====================================================



cheers
pluto
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Russia blocks UN nuclear ban on Iran
    ... Apparently you don't seem to understand that if Russia and/or China prevent ... Iran will never have a nuclear arsenal, there is no doubt about that. ... Russia blocks UN nuclear ban on Iran ...
    (soc.culture.iranian)
  • Re: CHINA AND RUSSIA FIT A TRUE BILL TO COUNTERBALANCE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    ... I ADVOCATED OVER THREE YEARS AGO THAT IRAN AND RUSSIA, ... ALSO IRAN AND CHINA SIGN MUTUAL DEFENSE TREATIES THAT WOULD ALLOW ... NOT TO BE HARASSED BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ISRAEL BOTH ...
    (soc.culture.iraq)
  • Shanghai: NATO of Asia or the Neo-Warsaw Pact?
    ... just attending an Asian security summit in China: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad ... Iran agrees, Tehran would then be able to enter negotiations with the ... Russia and China have backed the incentives package. ...
    (alt.religion.islam)
  • Why Rices Moscow Visit Failed
    ... Why Rice's Moscow Visit Failed ... Russia to put pressure on Iran for its nuclear infractions. ... Russia sees no reason to bring the Iranian file before the UN Security ...
    (soc.culture.russian)
  • Re: Shanghai: NATO of Asia or the Neo-Warsaw Pact?
    ... SCO aka. "Asian Nuclear Club". ... People's Republic of China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan ... India and Iran received observer status at the 2005 SCO ...
    (alt.religion.islam)

Loading