London suicide sheeps - Who Stands To Gain?
- From: "tony" <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:37:37 +0800
Warhol <molarh@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
london suicide sheeps - Who Stands To Gain?
To me, the symbolism is the key to the "who".
Al Quaida = The Base = Borg.
September 11 = 9/11 = 911 (dial 911 irony?) sept. 11 = 711 Moors Liberated
Iberia (Spian and Portugal) from the Zog that have took control of the Roman
churches and Vatican in Rome. Great kings were killed by the Zog Pirates in
those times.
Who has lost lives, living space and been put under extreem injustice by the
major superpowers? Who has the intellect, and structural organisation of
organising such attacks and being able to "cover it up"? Remember, only one
man can hold a secret ... the more you include in the secret, the less
possibility it is that it stays a secret ... and never for long. Who'd like
to get revenge, but remain anonymous ... at least for now?
But, maybe the sheeps are just too dumb and just want to stick their heads
up to get shot. I mean, they really have a chance against US and/or British
retaliation against them.
Nevertheless, where it took months - even years - to figure out 911 in the
US and coming to grips with the horrendous truth, which points in the
direction everyone already knows (rf. US-UK's wars of aggression for the
sake of Israel), with dire consequences for the two peoples of Irak and the
US. Millions of dead and wounded as a result, plus the US losing face,
economy and military superpower in that senseless venture.
Whereas today, it takes only seconds to figure out where the London
terrorist act (as well as Spain's and Russia's acts of terrors before that)
originated from.
We won't get fooled again.
Whether you like it or not.
You're right, it does make one sick. To our stomachs.
Not you?
Right, I forgot, you're so full of vulgarity and foulness, that wouldn't
make you sick. Only rejoice... takes all kinds, I suppose but keep your
filthy hands to yourself.
If you can't see through the crap of "enough intelligence" you gotta be a
retard. People with enough money, can go anywhere ... but people with
intelligence are the ones being stopped. Not the idiots ...
The fact of reality is, that people with higher intellect are the one group
that has the largest probability of being "outcast" in society. We can take
your "favorite" jews, as examples. They're intellect is largely "financial"
in nature, but it's enough for the majority of people to dislike them. I
really don't have the stomache to "arguement" these issues, they're so
plainly obvious that anyone who can't get it ... is plainly a retard not
worth the discussion.
And immigration, a problem? how, where, when? do you have a brain? The
immigration issues, around the world is the cumulative result of the
conquests of Britain, France, Germany, Russia and the US of A. To a large
degree, it's the UN with British, American, German, French and Russian
finances that are "supporting" the immigration efforts, and providing money
to all the nations of the UN to accept migrations, for various reasons, to
stupid to even start discussing (or disgusting).
So, if the "immigration" is a problem ... it would suggest, that the US and
Britain are the primary facilitators of these problems. To themselves? doh!
.... hardly.
Chaos leads to Order.
Order leads to Chaos.
Let's replace "immigrants" with computer viruses. And "governments" with
"corporations" and some drooling college student with "hacker". Which do you
think is more likely to be the "cause" of Computer virus problems?
A) A hacker, who gets to do 5 lines of code ... send it of to his friend,
and ruin his computer. Then come together with his friend at the pub, and
brag about being the cause of his (or her) computer problems.
B) Corporations, that want to sell an idea and a product, but need to have
"control" that will reduce the propability of Copyright violations. Such
control would require the "creation" of hysteria on the computer market, to
have the population "demand" for control that otherwise wouldn't exist.
Without which, full freedom of information would make detail knowledge of
products available to the public, and require continuous "production
improvements" to retain market share and domination, which leads to
continuous cost rise, instead of stable cost as the result of closed
information circles, and in-frequent improvements.
So, who do you think is more like ... A who has nothing to gain, except the
momentary rejoice of being stoned by his "friends". Or B, who stands to gain
millions and even trillions, in reduced production and personell costs. long
term.
__________________
Love your enemies for love is stronger than fear, stronger than hate,
stronger than war. Love is everything. Peace
.
- Prev by Date: U.S.-Israel crisis deepens over defense exports to China
- Next by Date: Condi licking her masters
- Previous by thread: U.S.-Israel crisis deepens over defense exports to China
- Next by thread: Condi licking her masters
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|