This is it (the it) We were so stupid.

200 year old laws guide the Iraq War

"patron, please explain your comment..."

Ok, but its hypothetical, one that Americans would surely call
ideological warfare, because its criticism of the United States.

Clear?

The problem is that the USA perceives this talk as ideological
warfare, but it is criticism, wich is a very sensitive and rapidly
classified matter of national secutity, I am already a terrorist
according to this talk right here. Its already too late you see.

So I have to say, the information is classified, just cut bush and
run, everybody is running away, its the system. Ooh, did I say
anything. Oh, no, spending the rest of my life in jail, its very
quick. Very effective. Cut the president. You and I are
conspirators.

In fact you were the one who asked me and pursuaded me to
commit this crime on the Internet. Its something that no
American can do, and people should learn from, from from
this everywhere in the country, that some things are taken
as viable threats, and and and and and so people shouldn't
offend the nation and should provoke violent crimes toward
the president, nor should nor should nor should, because
there is a notion.

The laws are in connection to these notions.

Notions that one might describe as part aspect of free speech,
and part aspect of security and taking preventative measures
against viable threats. Many people, even people here in yahoo
message boards were arrested, because they laughed and
spoke of killing the president. If I say, you kill the president
with a knife, you are part of a plot, and likely to spend the
rest of your life in jail, particularly, if you are excited about
such idea and you discuss with me how to carry out such
a plot against the president's life, right here, online. I, may
not get arrested, because it may turn out that it was you so
stupid to take my words so seriously, and a lot of American
patrons are sensitive to such talks online in regards to
conspiracies against the President. Perhaps not even in
other countries talk of plotting the murder of the president
may go unnoticed, such talk attracts attention, and violations
are raised in the criminal depatrments.

Ok, there are two problems here.

One is that there are laws, particularly in the military that make it
illegal to in any form intimidate the president. 1st Lt. Ehren Watada
was arrested and jailed 6-8 years for making contempt against
president Bush toward other officials. I think that he wasn't intending

to make threats against the President's life. I think he talked about
President Bush and the Iraq war as raising his human rights concerns.
The old law is that sensitivity in the USA toward people talking about
the president is based on laws that takes such subjects in an
extremely intimidating form. In a healthy society, normally even
military officers should be allowed to raise concerns of their own,
and the concerns are regarding the president of the United States.
They are of nature that carry humanitarian and personal concerns.
In the United States, no such concern-making is allowed and
contrary, they are taken as threats. It is a corrupt mentality, one
that
is of a military ethics that may be found in the 17th century, and it
is not compatible with the modern world. Not 200 year old laws,
400 year old laws.

There is a mentality, a sensitivity, a jumpiness to national
credibility and security.

And this jumpiness causes very strong reactions to matters of national
security, and a very paranoid behavior if any arise.

What is not noticed? That 1st Lt. Ehren Watada was expressing his
personal humanitarian concerns about President Bush. Such things will
never be noticed in this society. This society has this 400 year old
military mentality.

Speaking of the president gets one jailed for years and years.

The troops HAVE severe humanitarian problems.

Any ideas, improvements should be tolerated and listened to,
especially if its of humanitarian concern. This is not the 17th
century. Apparently it is.

1st Lt. Ehren Watada received 6-8 years jail for raising humanitarian
concerns about the Iraq war and of President Bush.

He was arrested for raising content toward other officials.

Think.

(Again, the psychology of the prison sadist culture arises,
repression.)

That's kind of the dead end 'for all arguments', but also for America.

For all arguments, a must dead end.

Here YOU don't count. Here YOU serve. Do not intimidate this
government. This government is very important.

The corruption is the mentality that is about bringing an 'end to all
arguments', and a strong military leadership, very old fashioned,
non-tolerant, a bigot government, or big government, a humanitarian
corruption and an abusive leadership, and all becomes abusive,
corrupt, dirty. Filthy.

So where is the problem? I have no problem.

I am going to take some fresh air.

.