Re: What does Google's infringment on general communication 'content' on public domains mean?
- From: gb7648@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 11 Jul 2006 05:58:46 -0700
Two public domains in question here: usenet and book libraries.
Anything wrong with the idea of going to public libraries, copying
books
and profiting from those copies? Something tells us that that is
illegal.
Libraries are not offering materials for profit, but for reading.
So anyway, Google is breaking a long tradition, that all things
for free out there are opportunities for billions to make.
Infringing on public domains which do not belong to Google
are piracies and illegitimate business.
As with book libraries Google infringed on the non-commerical
public domain of usenet and profits on the 'content' of general
communication, and in libraries on the books served for free,
but Google took the book materials for their commercial needs.
Not allowed, in both cases Google shouldn't infringe unilaterally
on public domains as such act is piracy and illegitimate business.
1. Not only Google infringes on freely served public domains,
they infringe on the public domains unilaterally (take it all,
archive, document it all, no questions asked, Google believes
its free so it can be acquired.
2. Infringing on the content of public domain materials is piracy
as those domains do not belong and cannot belong to Google
unilaterally. Since they cannot belong to Google but to the
public, Google infringed on these domains unilaterally.
3. The contents of general communication are sensitive to
privacy concerns but Google ignored these concerns at large.
4. Google builds profiles on usenet users, personal profiles
on people online, and some people who turn to usenet
from their homes may not even have a webpage of their own,
but Google freerly builds profiles on people's lives online
based on the content of their communication in usenet.
With this act Google runs people's lives online facelessly
through a massive violation of privacy rights (Google runs'
many people's lives and bussinesses in illegitimate
forms, and I am here to ask to stop their infringment
on public domains as its illegal and causes bizarre
and illegal privacy violations from the source of having
these domains pirated in the first place. Google's Groups
Beta and their Library Project are built on illegal piracies
and this class action suit focuses on the source
of these piracies as illegitimate and violating business
culture.
5.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: What does Google's infringment on general communication 'content' on public domains mean?
- Next by Date: Re: What does Google's infringment on general communication 'content' on public domains mean?
- Previous by thread: What does Google's infringment on general communication 'content' on public domains mean?
- Next by thread: Re: What does Google's infringment on general communication 'content' on public domains mean?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|