Re: Only a third of Americans believe that going into Iraq was the right thing to do



> > > And the number is dropping. They forgot to look for the alien spaceships in Iraq.
> > >
> > > At least oil is in the rights hands they say, but then they look at the oil prices...
> >
> > As many Iraqis died from Bush's war as the victims from the tsunami last year.
> > Ok, Saddam would be in power, and Bush was really doing something about the
> > mid-east crisis. Now all arabs hate Americans, and we can't say any more that
> > not one Iraqi citizen killed an American citizen in history. So Bush solves one
> > aspect, but it doesn't add up.
>
> So Bush picked a country, whose citizens never killed Americans before, and
> Bush tries to tie this country's leader with terrorism. That somehow, they are
> harboring terrorists, and that Saddam has a lot to do with Osama Bin Laden,
> that we know that he has such connections, its just we don't know about those
> secret connections. Everybody knows, Saddam killed millions in wars, and
> he was a bad unilateral, who caused constant problems for oil businesses and
> for Israel, threatening Israel with possible destructions, and we all knew that
> could have been possible, so Bush used this to rage war against Saddam. Bush
> put aside politics, when after Saddam flip flopping on weather inspectors can
> go into Iraq or not, and finally on August of 2002, Saddam announced that
> the Inspectors can come in. But Bush announced: that's it. No more flip flopping.
> You are mine. But that was an illegal political thing to do, because that way
> Bush could have overthrown anybody with such logic.

Then people said: Saddam was the great enemy of Bush's father, so as a family
business, it didn't look good. Italians portrayed Bush in protests as a gangster.
So we agree. It was too dirty. Right?

"Bush unilaterally declaring war to France, Germany and Russia, stated: Let me tell
you fair and square. Only countries that risked lives are allowed to profit from Iraq's
reconstruction projects."

Its gonna be crimes against humanity anyway at the end.


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: (off topic) Bush the sub-human trash -GRAHAM:What I Knew Before the Invasion
    ... this was the data provided to Bush and this is what ... >> Those that saw the original intelligence reports believed that Saddam ... He saw it and voted against the war. ... No national elections in 2003. ...
    (soc.culture.thai)
  • Re: OT: THE 20D: SO LAME, IT MOCKS WOMEN WHO SPEAK THEIR MIND!
    ... Iraq given Saddam's track record of *actually using* WMDs, ... Bush Saddam had nothing. ... Saddam's bluster didn't cause the war. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Surprise...The War is LEGAL & Bush is NOT a Liar...
    ... If you have a legitimate gripe about the war in Afghanistan ... However to consistantly headline with "Bush Lied", ... No one can argue that Saddam Hussein possessed and used WMD's. ... UNSCOM were in Iraq to to be shown the evidence and not to search a country ...
    (uk.politics.misc)
  • Re: OT - Blue & Red
    ... absolutely no terrorism at all before 9/11 or since. ... >Saddam _is_ a bad guy who doesn't like us. ... >> But they were back in, which was a requirement to avoid the war. ... that doesn't matter because Bush was sitting in the ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)
  • Re: White House cant fill "Czar" position
    ... The pacification phase was over soon, but that was with the citizens tired of war and facing a worse enemy to their east. ... Bush I was unable to shift to a pacification phase for political reasons. ... Bush II resumed hostilities in the ongoing war with Iraq on 20 March ... Political theory claims "Imperialism" is different from "socialism", but I don't see that much difference to the citizens. ...
    (misc.survivalism)