Re: The new 'real' netiquette? (draft)

> > > The netiquette needs an updating, the real netiquette:
> > >
> > > 1. Impersonation is a federal crime, punishable by law.
> > > 2. Archiving usenet messages violates civil rights.
> > >
> > > Ok, 1 is debatable, because there are so many forms of impersonations.
> > > Impersonating other posters online is a federal crime. Using their
> > > Names, emails, and other personal data is really a civil rights violation.
> > >
> > > See most of the netiquette applies to Google archiving: Be careful what
> > > you post, because people archive you, and so on, but Google is by far
> > > the primary archiver of usenet.
> > >
> > > 2. Don't archive usenet messages, because messages are generally discussions made
> > > from the comfort of people's homes, and archiving such discussions, unless for
> > > specific purposes, is unethical, and violate human and civil rights of privacy and
> > > dignity. Archiving discussions that stand as 'chats' in practice, is something
> > > very niggerizing as it infringes on people's homes and privacy and human dignity.
> > > Its very nasty, something seen in the movie 1984 with cameras on the wall,
> > > in your own home. Google cams.
> > >
> > > 1. Stealing personal information and using it without the approval of the
> > > person is an act of abusing people.
> > >
> > > I can borrow one from the old one:
> > > 3. Personal conflicts should be resolved in private.
> > >
> > > "They are sick pigs (the Google)". So:
> > > 4: No Google on the Internet. No that kind of thing. Forget that it ever existed.
> > >
> > > 5: No companies with general public customer services to Usenet.
> > > Usenet posters are not customers of anybody. Usenet has no customer
> > > services dependencies as a Global International Entity, only the netiquette.
> > > No such business dependencies are allowed.
> > >
> > > General archiving of usenet discussions will always remain a giant Orwellian
> > > violation. That's why I called them a Ceaucescuian publishing corruption.
> > > (Remember Ceaucescu's street cameras? Google Groups Beta is that
> > > kind of an intrusion to a free heart.)
> > >
> > > THE REAL NETIQUETTE APPLIES BOTH TOWARD COMPANIES
> > > AND TO PEOPLE!
> > >
> > > 6: if you are plunking of killfiling someone, don't advertise it.
> > > (unless you are a professional sadist working in Abu Graib or Guantanamo Bay.)
> > >
> > > 7: No trolling. (Finally.)
> > >
> > > 8. No commercial soliciting. Duh! (I can feel it.)
> > >
> > > 9. No religious shovenism. ??? (Religious Trolls? Jesus is the savior! Vote for Jesus!)
> > >
> > > 10. Any personal information (name, address, phone number, credit card, social secutity number, etc.)
> > > taken from usenet to websites must be removed from the websites upon personal request,
> > > regardless who posted that message. In California they already have an "antiphishing law"
> > > requiring webpages to cooperate with the removal of personal information. This includes
> > > search engines, usenet search engines, as they are webpages. This is a matter of basic
> > > education. Knock on your foreheads, pigs if you think otherwise. If you think you can
> > > store anything about anybody, you are very wrong. Don't be a Googlist publishing
> > > sociopath, screwing everybody's copyrights, privacy, dignity, violating human rights,
> > > civil rights, violating fair business, committing international crimes against humanity,
> > > stealing, megalomaniacal anticompetitiveness, violating consumer rights, etc. etc. etc.
> >
> > When basic human dignities are violated in the name of 'he can't do anything about it',
> > then there is a severe misjudgment of what humanity is about.
> >
> > Online is a 1940's Germany environment in terms of human dignities. People are pissed
> > at here, spat at, and destroyed, psychotically abused, with verbal arrogance unimaginable
> > out in the streets.
> >
> > Google applies the same arrogance toward humanity to make money online. They archive
> > people's discussions and publish them online. There is nothing more arrogant than that.
> > Ceaucescu would have loved it. This environment is humanly unacceptable. Its not human.
> > Its Abu Graib, combined with 1940's Germany, combined with the sadist guards in
> > Guantanamo Bay, combined with Bush's take over the world aptitudes, people not realizing
> > how they are treating others, what they are doing online, combined with shovenists, as
> > generally males dominate usenet. Males who have no conscience, abusing people,
> > posting with their names and emails, harrassment, and seeking friends who seemingly
> > appreciate seeing those harrassments, and bark together about killfiling people, and
> > psychological molestation games like raising the temperature in the gas chamber by
> > one degree every hour. All this is happening because the netiquette is corrupt.
>
> Did I just say "Bush's aptitudes to take over the world". Take that one out from the
> new netiquette. Or add:
>
> 11. No Bush aptitudes to take over the world.

(primitive behaviors are not accepted on usenet, as usenet is an International Territory.)


.

Loading