Re: why we bow our heads to thai royal and not lao royal

vannasay, this time you sound very stupid.

On Nov 27, 12:29 pm, vannasay <VanSin...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Phainam and Pizone

Thank you Phanam for providing this interesting article which has
clearly shown on one of so many deplorable contrasts between the Thai
Princess and our own Lao Prince, specially in the main area of
political and diplomatic skills and practical knowledge on how to use
effectively their royal status to reach out to the ordinary people for
making a good point in either social or humanitarian long impression.
It seems to me that we have had plenty of notes to compare more than
several times already on this issue, and I categorically say that this
is not an act of disrespect for the Prince who has grown up in a royal
cocoon in which there's never been any strong tradition of
humanitarian outreach extensively to the most vulnerable of Lao
population nationwide, except a few very rare occasions, even at the
zenith of a peaceful time. Any monarch who can't face all these
ultimate tasks in a modern time will be losing out in popularity and
support. As Lao, should we not feel collectively a bit of guilt for
not being able to do a few good deeds for our own fellowmen and women,
by separating the dirty politics from the humanitarian assistance.
Pizone has chosen as usual the wrong side of history to lay out his
case, a Prince in exil should be as capable as he's not, otherwise
it's just another unacceptable excuse to recant the real hidden
incompetence for the Prince, look at the examples of Prince Sihanouk
or Dalai Lama who were or are still in exil, and who toured
incessantly on their own all over the capitals of the world to promote
their voice of concern or causes to the world sympathizers, unlike
Pizone's dear Prince is up to the Lao people to nurture him like a
never grown up baby.

it you vannasay who say "the prince is up to the Lao people to nurture
him". i never say such stupid statement. only stupid lao person like
you say such stupid thing to the prince or to any national figure. in
case you can't understand what you read, here again what i said,
"it's up to the lao people to choose."

To me, to revere a picture of any king or hang that picture on the
wall in your home is strictly a personal choice and quite an
artificial posture too comparing to a real feeling of connection
between the king and his subjects.

you confuse people here, it's to you (yourself) or to other people?

I know a few Lao doing that,

i've been to many palces, states and countries, so far i didn't see
any laonork house hang thai king picture on the wall. i think it's
just paranois people like you and phainam, don't have anything to
badmouth your own kind beside bringing up this issue or making up
like lao people like to hang thai king in their house.

I
guess that they must feel the need of a symbol or roll model that they
can't find with their own king as inspirational guidance for their
life, so they have chosen Thai king's picture, even though that symbol
looks very misplaced to the majority of Lao people and to me, too.

this is a make up story or you're so stupid not to know the fact that
lao people. no matter they're laonorl or laonai don't like to hang up
thai king picture in their house.

Since you took Pizone to his task with this sample, and now he comes
back to plead with the same old testimonials so incomprehensive but
dear to him again and again. I hope that Pizone should accuse this
Thai Princess of "equally commu", too, that's the label he loves to
paint so artificially on anybody who challenges him. According to his
new invented definition, for the fairness, this Thai Princess must be
indeed qualified as a royal communist, too.

Vannasay,

now you even can't distinguish between monarchy and communism, the
more you talk the more you sound more stupid, what's happen to you
lately, vannasay?

i hate communism in laos only, if you don't agree with me or don't
like it, it's ok with me, but don't stupidly saying such anything like
that...

pizone
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: why we bow our heads to thai royal and not lao royal
    ... is not an act of disrespect for the Prince who has grown up in a royal ... humanitarian outreach extensively to the most vulnerable of Lao ... i never say such stupid statement. ... any laonork house hang thai king picture on the wall. ...
    (soc.culture.laos)
  • Re: why we bow our heads to thai royal and not lao royal
    ... is not an act of disrespect for the Prince who has grown up in a royal ... humanitarian outreach extensively to the most vulnerable of Lao ... life, so they have chosen Thai king's picture, even though that symbol ... the school was built in 1976 and has accommodated ...
    (soc.culture.laos)
  • Re: Marriage of a Lao Crown Prince outside Laos
    ... qualification, for what ever it might be. ... personally I don't think that Prince Soulivong is a bad ... doubtful speculations on his real competence, not as Prince of the Lao ... what's good what is bad for our nation... ...
    (soc.culture.laos)
  • Re: Marriage of a Lao Crown Prince outside Laos
    ... personally I don't think that Prince Soulivong is a bad ... doubtful speculations on his real competence, not as Prince of the Lao ... Prince to do in His real life situation? ... represents our rich and long history of Lao Lanexang nation, ...
    (soc.culture.laos)
  • Re: why we bow our heads to thai royal and not lao royal
    ... Sabaidee Vannasay and all. ... You are right about the homeless prince. ... Pizone said I am stupid too. ...
    (soc.culture.laos)