Re: President Lao PDR urges use of French to maintain peace

Phi Dung Mo

I come to like your rebuttal from which you have made yourself sound
like a politically very correct guy who sees no monkey anywhere, but
literally takes thing at its face value with good faith. Bless your
heart! I wish I could see the same miracle as you do without ever
questioning the value of anything, and believe the world is a
paradise. I know you're Canadian, certainly not French Canadian as you
sound, but obedient enough that makes you even more of a good fellow
for which it's very hard to come by these days.

To me, I stand on my ground with always a flair of questions ready to
jump in by looking beneath and above to find that little bug in
hidding, and if it were just me being out of the touch, make my
day,,,that's not bigger deal, and nobody could get hurt or itchy, but
if it were the leader of a country, thing could really get ugly.
There's not much of the content to talk about, but that title sounds
so phony that makes it irresistible. Please, don't substitute this
light weight with even worst of the worst from your idol Bush, by
doing so you might spoil all your hard earned little good deed. We can
differ in the course of an opinion, that's all about in a debate.


Vannasay,





On Nov 25, 7:43 pm, "Phi Dung Mo" <phidun...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Vannassay,
What do you not understand about the subject as it was used? It was a
comment on a portion of the Presidents speach. So how was this speech
derisive?

Is it derisive when Bush talks of world peace to America, NATO, the G7,
the Americas group or possibly at a State fair? They are also not the only
instruments of peace in the world. You address the group that you are
speaking to. There is nothing in the quoted comments limiting his concept of
who or what can maintain peace exclusively to the Francophony group, other
than it's an appeal to that group. Should he have urged America, China,
Russia, India or Pakhistan to maintain world peace in this speech? Now, how
would that have fit into the context of the speech?

I think that you are the one out of touch for some reason over this
speech. Maybe looking hard for an issue where no issue exists? The speech
even specifically addresses prior meetings of the group where this very same
topic was obviously discussed and it sounds as though there may have been
specific resolutions from those prior meetings. French is a small portion of
the world's languages, Laos is an even smaller country and ethnic grouping.
Does that mean that French or Lao are not allowed to talk amongst nor about
themselves, of maintaining world peace?

Phi Dung Mo

"vannasay" <VanSin...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:cb61db8a-f4da-4f38-a064-20a6bec9fed1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



I don't know who is behind this thread using the pseudo name of
Vientiane, is he a reporter for the event such like this and others,
then to communicate to the world. Unquestionably, we can all but being
thankful to such extent from this generous messenger who spends his
time to convery us with a variety of news from Laos today that
otherwise we wouldn't get. Nevertheless, often time the given title
should have casted with no doubt the summary from the real content,
not any cosmetic words which makes it look like a spreading of
propaganda. For instance, this one "President Lao PDR urges use of
French to maintain peace" is literally used in such derisive way
without any reality check, I am not anti French, but willing to
challenge at least for the fairness of the information. French is just
a tiny token of today's peace keeping capability in the world, if the
connotation of this speech is intended for reall it is out of touch.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

.