Re: Are Koreans mass murderers? Historical incident says yes
- From: "NY.Transport.News" <grunt262@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Apr 2007 00:01:43 -0700
On Apr 22, 8:24 am, "tttt" <Confucianism_taoism_Buddh...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"raylopez99" <raylope...@xxxxxxxxx> >
Perhaps Koreas are 'hard wired' to be shooters? Certainly they have a
'fierce' reputation as warriors.
RL
Wrong! you are totally wrong!
Korean male are the most cowardly in the world.
in history, Gook never win a war once independently.
folks beside their nation can easily teased them and sleep their female.(in
ancient,there are several nations in the northern of ChaoXuan(Korean) at
different ages ,such as mongolia,nvzheng, qidan,russia.....)
if no China protected them ,there is no Korean now).
Gook, they never have resist spirite when other race invaded. never! what
is more their male shamelessly sent their female to occupier for their cheap
life.
they are slavers in born.
Modern history
I retell some general idea in reminiscence wrote by usa military general
about gook soldier in Korean war.
'when S.Korea soldiers heard the soud of Chinese assault bugle they only do
2 things, one , flee in disorder, two, surrender immediately.'
'They are the worst army i'v ever seen, they were scared out of wits'
'30 chinese soldiers can finish off 300 S.k soldiers'......
.......
.......
.......
yep! he is right!
One specific example of a battle
about 100 chinese soldiers annihilated and captured S.k a whole regiment.
the regiment was known as a S.K picked troops ---'white tiger regiment'.
the flag of 'white tiger regiment' is displaying in the military museum of
China.
In our eyes, they are not soldiers they are moving meat. beat them is as
easy as beat a piece of Doufu.
Interesting. Below is from www.wikipedia.com about Chinese invading
Northern
Vietnam in 'punitive' action in 1979 (?). Read about Chinese
casualties versus
Vietnamese casualties. One word: pitiful. This is same Vietnamese
communist
troops that is said to have issued orders not to fight Korean troops
(White Horse
Division and Blue Dragon marine division) unless victory was
certain.
By the way, 1979 is just 4 years after South Vietnam fell. Vietnam
one country
devastated by years of war. China has no qualms to start war when it
sees fit.
This is same China that occupied South Vietnamese islets by the time
South Vietnam was about to fall to Northern communists. China still
occupies
those islets.
Chinese liberation, after all, was no more than cry baby; China
liberated is no
different than Western imperialist powers that used to subjugate
China.
Many historians have stated that this claim might have been a convenient excuse for a
Chinese exit strategy from Vietnam.[citation needed] Most observers at the time had
believed that the PLA would simply overwhelm the Vietnamese forces. The PLA did not
foresee the tough resistance of the Vietnamese people, including the suicidal attacks
by women and children trying to defend their own towns and villages. Faced with
mounting casualties, the Chinese began to withdraw their forces, and, by March 16,
1979, withdrawal was complete.
Chinese casualties
To this day, both sides of the conflict claim victory. The number of casualties is
disputed, with some Western sources putting PLA losses at more than 60,000
casualties, including about 26,000 killed.[1] These figures might be exaggerated.
Such high estimates were partly due to Vietnamese exaggerations of the size of
the invading Chinese force, which numbered 600,000 according to Vietnamese
propaganda. However, the Chinese did suffer an extremely high casualty rate of
25%. This was confirmed during a visit to the United States in the 1980s by the
chief of the general staff of the PLA, Yang Dezhi (杨得志), who had commanded
the Chinese troops in Vietnam. During this visit, Yang announced that the Chinese
suffered a total of 20,000 casualties in the conflict. Li Xiannian, then Chairman of
China, stated during a news conference that the Vietnamese claim of having destroyed
half the Chinese tank contingent in Vietnam was true, but he disputed their exact figures.
Li asserted that the Chinese lost over 100 tanks, contradicting Vietnamese claims of
having destroyed 200 Chinese tanks. Chinese tanks deployed in Vietnam were only 200,
much lower than the Chinese' own expectation, thanks to the effects of the Cultural
Revolution and the mountainous terrain of northern Vietnamese border. When asked f
or the exact number of Chinese casualties in the conflict, Li sidestepped the question
by replying with an ancient Chinese cliché: "(One) would suffer 800 fatalities when killing
a thousand enemies" - swiftly adding that this did not imply that 800 Chinese soldiers fell
for every 1000 Vietnamese killed. However, Chinese information released since the late
1990s, such as records from the Ji'nan Military District, have revealed a further 6,000
fatalities. Shocked by the high casualties, the Chinese had lowered the number to 20,000
by excluding 5,500 who died after the war as result of their wounds, and another 500 who
were killed by malfunctioning weaponry (poor quality weapons made during the Cultural
Revolution). The figure of 26,000 casualties is widely accepted among Chinese civilians,
including most of those who participated in the war, and is increasingly being adopted
by local Chinese governments.
.
- References:
- Are Koreans mass murderers? Historical incident says yes
- From: raylopez99
- Re: Are Koreans mass murderers? Historical incident says yes
- From: tttt
- Are Koreans mass murderers? Historical incident says yes
- Prev by Date: Re: Are Koreans mass murderers? Historical incident says yes
- Next by Date: Re: Chairman Mao's poem(*.txt)
- Previous by thread: Re: Are Koreans mass murderers? Historical incident says yes
- Next by thread: Re: Are Koreans mass murderers? Historical incident says yes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
