Re: Should benefits be limited to £26,000?
- From: "Henry Goodman" <henry.goodman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:01:30 +0000 (UTC)
"mm" <NOPSAMmm2005@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:pegki7pq2r7ll8dha1qin9n004el5u5kki@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 12:45:04 +0000 (UTC), "Henry Goodman"There is no limit now. They get housing allowances, i.e. rent according to rent levels in the area.
<henry.goodman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The House of Lords (led by bishops) has defeated the Government's proposal
to limit family benefits to the average income of working families.
I don't understand. What is their limit now?
More than the average income of working families?
More but only more because it pays extra the more chidren one has?
Based on prior income is my last guess?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-16825646
Jewish connection. Many Haredi families in Stamford Hill (probably
Manchester also) are living on these benefits.
I'm also interested in the efforts by Scotland to secede.
No more on topic than American primary elections.
--
Henry Goodman
henry dot goodman at virgin dot net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Should benefits be limited to £26,000?
- From: frank
- Re: Should benefits be limited to £26,000?
- From: mm
- Re: Re: Should benefits be limited to £26,000?
- References:
- Should benefits be limited to £26,000?
- From: Henry Goodman
- Re: Should benefits be limited to £26,000?
- From: mm
- Should benefits be limited to £26,000?
- Prev by Date: Re: Manchester has highest Anti-Semitism crime rate in UK
- Next by Date: Re: Manchester has highest Anti-Semitism crime rate in UK
- Previous by thread: Re: Should benefits be limited to £26,000?
- Next by thread: Re: Should benefits be limited to £26,000?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|