Re: Stephen Hawking Challenges God (zoorabbi)
- From: "Steve Goldfarb" <slg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:04:38 +0000 (UTC)
In <i9hl9n$u4o$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Micha Berger <micha@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
But for now, I stand by what I said earlier: There is an irony to Hawking
asserting M-Theory as though it were a proven law when it's not even up
to being a theory yet, and positing an unseeable inifinity, and saying
that he thereby wraps it up for the whole religion and god thing...
Have you read the book? I haven't. If Hawking actually does assert
M-Theory as if it were a proven law as you claim, then yes - that would be
ironic. But did he in fact do so?