Re: British "justice"
- From: Ariadne <ariadne.mac@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 19:16:39 +0000 (UTC)
On 25 Sep, 20:38, Ariadne <ariadne....@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 30 July, 14:44, Ariadne <ariadne....@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 26 July, 17:59, mm <NOPSAMmm2...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't think either is the proper issue. His lack of neutrality
during the trial should be investigated, which seems like a
slam-dunk
to me. Can he be permanently removed from his judgeship, or at > > least
given clerical work to do?
In the US it depends to some extent on the rules of each state and > > the
feds. But generally the answer is yes, afaik. Even elected judges
and those with lifetime appointments have to live up to some
standards.
& unless there is more evidence of his AS the
charges of AS will fail. & we have thus let him off the hook for his
biased judgement on what is essentially none of his business.
But also
cheapened the charge of anti semitism. Imo being against the
occupation/blockade is not necessarily being anti Israel or anti
zionist or anti semitic.
--
Meir
An opinion of a friend of the judge:
http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/36106/analysis-how-propaganda-swaye...
Another opinion:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2010/sep/23/law-expert-view-gaza-war
The judge has been reprimanded:
http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2010/10/07/hell-on-earth-gaza-judge-reprimanded/
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Israel’s Strange “Peace Partners”
- Next by Date: Re: Judge Bathurst-Norman
- Previous by thread: Israel’s Strange “Peace Partners”
- Next by thread: Israel's new loyalty oath
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
