Re: Hello and Shalom

On Nov 29, 9:57 am, "cindys" <cste...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Eliyahu" <lro...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:60f2c6b6-6e78-4c9f-abc8-31c2c448543a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Nov 28, 7:45 pm, mi...@xxxxxxxxxxx (Micha Berger) wrote:
Eliyahu <lro...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's available worldwide, but that doesn't mean everyone reads it.
There aren't many Jewish social forums, so I hope this one is a
success.

Some of us have been here for at least 23 years. I thought it was 25,
but Google Groups has nothing before
<http://groups.google.com/group/net.religion.jewish/msg/ae7a84f5a12ac417>.
(Nov 11th -- I expect anniversary presents.) And /now/ you are hoping for
success? <g>

Well, we know that SCJM isn't for everyone, and there are many folks
who aren't even aware of Usenet. Realistically, it is better to have
a diverse array of forums anyhow. With millions of Jews using the
Internet, can you imagine what this group would be like if only a few
thousand of them began posting regularly? The expression that comes
to mind is "totally unmanageable chaos". It's much the same as if
everyone in NYC wanted to go to the same shul. No one would ever get
an aliyah, and everyone would be lost in the crowd. It's the same
with forums. There are limits to functional size.

-----
What I don't get is why the OP was advertising the group equally on the SCJ
unmoderated group and alt.messy (all with the identical message). I
explained that the SCJ unmoderated group was nothing but an antisemitic
sewer but received no response/follow-up.
Best regards,
---Cindy S.

Probably in hopes of reaching as many Jews as possible. I did note
that Cramer, on SCJ, gave her a "FU" message, which, if nothing else,
makes her our ally. :-)

Eliyahu
.

Quantcast