Re: The Truth About What The Palestinians REALLY Want


"Steve Goldfarb" <slg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fhcl82$l21$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In <1bidnTJNnvhcSKTanZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@xxxxxxx> "Dan Kimmel"
<daniel.kimmel@xxxxxxx> writes:

See what I mean? It's just not a particularly descriptive word - it's
really a euphemism.

Not really. Gandhi and King and the Lubavitcher rebbe aren't
"extremists."
An extremist is someone outside of the mainstream, even if they are
controversial. Thus Jesse Jackson is not an extremist, but Al Sharpton
is.
Arafat and bin Laden and Kahane were/are extremists, Abbas and Netanyahu
are
not.

I'm not trying to be difficult here, but I honestly don't get your
definition. Gandhi and King were pretty far outside the mainstream, they
galvanized enormous protests. While they were non-violent, there's nothing
in the word "extremist" itself that requires or even implies a propensity
towards violence. One could most certainly be an extreme pacifist.

But it does imply a willingness to force change and work outside the system.
Gandhi and King both made a point of change *through* the existing society.



It's not having controversial views. It's going beyond that to the point
of
taking or advocating action requiring others to submit against their
will.

No, that doesn't work for me either. How does Al Sharpton try to get
others to submit against their will? He works within the legal system - by
that definition any advocate is an extremist.

Al Sharpton has provoked riots and *abused* the legal system. He is no
"advocate." He is, or ought to be, considered a pariah.


The point is, "extremist" just means that they're taking something,
typically a philosophy or point of view, in a direction that the so-called
mainstream considers to be "too far." It doesn't imply anything about
violence, or even about the direction they're taking that philosophy, or
anything about their intent. Just because you're an "extremist" doesn't
necessarily mean you want anybody to do anything, maybe it just means
you're doing something yourself.

All I'm saying is the word doesn't work for the purpose you're trying to
use it -- as you proved yourself above. As both Osama bin Laden and Al
Sharpton are "extremists," clearly we need a different word to describe
bin Laden's agenda.

We already have it. It's called "terrorism."



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Truth About What The Palestinians REALLY Want
    ... fair to label Al Sharpton as an extremist black leader, ... best to people like Al Sharpton. ... I think even they would agree that he's extreme, ... If Al Sharpton is an extremist, then surely Osama Bin Ladin is something ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)
  • Re: The Truth About What The Palestinians REALLY Want
    ... but the contrast with Sharpton, who has apologized for NOTHING, is clear. ... I think even they would agree that he's extreme, ... If Al Sharpton is an extremist, then surely Osama Bin Ladin is something ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)
  • How can thought be rigorous
    ... extreme nature mistake. ... In the development of humanity which continued several millenniums, ... This is what had not been expressed by philosophy ... Contains threshold value spot of comprehensive and the positive by ...
    (soc.culture.usa)
  • How can thought be rigorous
    ... extreme nature mistake. ... In the development of humanity which continued several millenniums, ... This is what had not been expressed by philosophy ... Contains threshold value spot of comprehensive and the positive by ...
    (soc.culture.british)
  • Re: Free and Fair Elections
    ... NPR is pro-obama. ... their "editorial" philosophy is extreme left wing. ...
    (rec.music.opera)