Re: The Orthodoxy Test

In article <2006Jan2.164909@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, moshes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> "Henry Goodman" <henry.goodman@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> <moshes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> "B. Tkatch" <SPAMBLOCK.Maxwell_Smart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> >
>>> > Anything can affect it, and Science will record the law if it is
>>> > observable (and repeatable). The four forces themselves are
>>> > accepted without decent explanation. They just are.
>>>
>>> Could you enumerate them please. TIA.
>>
>> Strong nuclear, weak nuclear, electromagnetic and gravitational.
>
> I knew about gravitational. I think that's the meaning of "Toleh
> eretz al bli mah - [G-d] hangs the world on a 'nothing'".
>
> What's the difference between strong nuclear and weak?
>

The old timer asks his scientist grandson to explain Einstein's
Theory of Relativity. The grandson says, "Zeyde, it's like this:
when you go to the dentist and get a cavity filled without a shot
of Novocaine, a minute is like an hour, but when you have a
gorgeous young blonde sit on your lap, an hour seems like a
minute". The old timer looks up and says (thick Yiddish accent)
"This Weinstein [tm], from THIS he makes a living ???"

Josh



> Moshe Schorr
> It is a tremendous Mitzvah to always be happy! - Reb Nachman of Breslov
> The home and family are the center of Judaism, *not* the synagogue.
> Disclaimer: Nothing here necessarily reflects the opinion of Hebrew University
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Orthodoxy Test
    ... and Science will record the law if it is ... > Strong nuclear, weak nuclear, electromagnetic and gravitational. ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)
  • Re: My definition of force!!!
    ... >> How would you distinguish between the fundamental forces? ... >> force is sort of potential distance. ... > Weak nuclear force example please. ... You tell me which one is weak nuclear and why? ...
    (sci.physics)