Re: Iranian President calls for Israel's destruction

"Steve Goldfarb" <slg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:djtj2l$3a0$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In <djtigs$l83$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "Rafael" <jmalfatto@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
writes:
>
> >> I believe that among libertarians that's kind of a sticky issue. I have
> >> the fundamental right to engage in commerce, so society shouldn't be
> >> allowed to pass a law prohibiting me from doing so, e.g., by making it
> >> illegal for me to buy a house in a particular neighborhood. OTOH, as I
> >> have the right to engage in commerce, how can society prohibit me from
> >> selling (or not selling) to whomever I choose?
> >>
> >> So by that logic, it would be illegal for Monsey, say, to pass any laws
> >> favoring or not favoring the sale of homes to Orthodox Jews, but OTOH
it
> >> would also be illegal to prevent a resident from refusing to sell his
home
> >> to anyone but an O Jew.
>
> >Agreed (even though I favor a more moderate form of liberalism than many
> >libertarians seem to favor).
>
> Of course, that introduces a whole other issue of "coercion," that is,
> maybe the individual wants to sell to the highest bidder regardless of
> race or religion, but feels coerced by his neighbors not to do so. In that
> way a decision that appears to be an exercise of individual rights is
> actually a defacto public policy.
>
> Similar issue is women wearing hijab -- they say it's voluntary, but is it
> really? And does the state have any interest in overcoming de-facto public
> policies to support real individual liberty, or is that over-stepping?

Dunno. Was France's outlaw of their wear in public schools (only) illiberal?
or are there some freedoms that no society (however liberal in its ideals)
can abide without an eventual net loss in freedom?

Rafael


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Iranian President calls for Israels destruction
    ... >> I believe that among libertarians that's kind of a sticky issue. ... >> have the right to engage in commerce, how can society prohibit me from ... actually a defacto public policy. ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)
  • Re: More freedom-hating "libertarians"
    ... Widespread private ownership of property is also a signficantly ... The LDP supports the right of 'eminent domain' of property owners over ... It just seems that way when encountering modern society where there are rules to promote and maintain a civil society. ... In modern times, Libertarians are not free market promoters, but free rider opportunist. ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Re: Byproduct of Bush?
    ... the majority of the population," and you believe, as libertarians do, ... that a libertarian society is better for the majority, ... solely on monetary transactions, is just fine. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.fandom)
  • Libertarians (was: Re: - JUST ONCE - VT Shootings)
    ... When will the Libertarians come out in favor of social freedoms ... and two things only: guns and taxes. ... I know that many US Libertarians consider themselves to be highly ...
    (rec.pets.cats.anecdotes)
  • Re: Why you SHOULD NOT immigrate to canada!
    ... whenever a piece of logic is used to refute your lie ... Libertarians and neo-conservatives are the Talibans of the West. ... They feel their stupid belief system is crumbling and they start calling ... But the society it is going to evolve with or without libertarians ...
    (sci.econ)