Arab Agitation Subsidized
- From: "Richard H. Shulman" <richardshulman5@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 06:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
ARAB AGITATION SUBSIDIZED 15708 – Shulman
WHAT RESPONSIBILITY HAVE ARABS FOR EACH OTHER?
The higher fuel prices that are enriching oil exporting Arab states
are helping to raise food prices beyond what many Arabs and foreign
workers in other Arab states can afford. Some Arab governments
subsidize food or offer other financial support to their people.
Others don’t. Riots occur. What responsibility have the enriched
Arabs for the impoverished ones? (IMRA, 4/4.)
Arab states use the Arab-Israel conflict to divert attention from real
domestic problems, but they don’t assist the impoverished Palestinian
Arabs whom they claim to care about. They don’t care about them.
Most of them deny Arab refugees citizenship. The 140 million other
refugees in modern times resettled, but the Arab world keeps its
refugee problem seething. Then it looks for sympathy from foreign
cultures.
AGITATION SUBSIDIZED
The Mukhtar of Silwan negotiated with Israeli authorities over
archeological excavations. Nevertheless, Arabs there protested, some,
violently. They were paid to by a German news agency looking for
excitement and by S. Arabian and P.A. agents wanting strife. The
Mukhtar said that Islamists threaten any Arab who works with the
government of Israel at solving problems (Arutz-7, 4/4).
UNO VS. FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Muslim and other African members of the UNO Human Rights Commission
passed a resolution against expression of opposition to Islam. They
call such speech bigotry, but the member states are known for wanting
to control speech.
The US, which is not a member of the Commission, opposed the
resolution. The European members abstained. They have been opposing
freedom of expression against opposition to Islam. They censured and
censored the Dutch film that expresses serious objections to the
hatred espoused by Islam. Europe’s opposition to freedom of speech
undermines democracy (and defense against jihad). Some of the
Europeans are afraid for their lives.
The issues raised in the Dutch film are serious and proved. The
leftist European officials won’t discuss that. British politicians
are trying to pass laws banning criticism of Islam (Caroline Glick in
IMRA, 4/5) but not Islamic criticism of others.
Again we find Bush’s US a voice for decency and the European
officials, whom Bush is urged to work with, a voice for surrender.
The UNO remains evil.
.
- Prev by Date: Haaretz' Two Voices
- Next by Date: Over 250 GOSPEL VIDEOS
- Previous by thread: Haaretz' Two Voices
- Next by thread: Over 250 GOSPEL VIDEOS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|