Why Europeans are receiving what they deserve?????


"Antigone" <jr89foo176pp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1189887513.672073.251930@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Yes, only a radical Jew, full of self-delusion and perverse
"specialness" could turn a commentary about the plummeting birthrates
of Germans and all European peoples into a chance to beat the drums of
his own persecution, as if World War II is only a footnote when
compared to the fairy tale holy writ that is the "Holocaust" story,
bent and stretched and fashioned Hollywood-style by the liar Elie
Wiesel until it resembles more an Old Testament plague than anything
that could have actually occurred in the real world, where the rules
of science still apply.

In 1975 Jewish CBS reporter Mike Wallace journeyed to another Arab
nation, Syria, to do a 60 Minutes program on the country. Years later,
he noted his own biases (about alleged Syrian anti-Semitism) that were
destroyed when he actually went to Damascus:

"[Before I went to Syria] I had a strong impression of what life was
like for [Jews] there. From Jewish friends in America, I had heard
the same stories over and over again: The Jews in Syria were confined
to ghettos and were constant victims of persecution. A tight curfew was
imposed on them and they were not allowed to have telephones or
drives automobiles. Nor were they permitted to worship in synagogues
of study in their traditional language, Hebrew. In short, the Syrian
Jews
were forced to live as prisoners within their own country." [WALLACE/
GATES, 1984, p. 282]

All this, as Wallace soon learned upon visiting Syria, was complete
nonsense. Jews owned cars; Jews had classes in Hebrew. Although the
Jewish community was under close surveillance by the Assad regime,
Wallace is careful to note that so was everyone in that police state.
The CBS reporter interviewed a variety of Jews in the Arab country.
Speaking to a Jewish teacher, Wallace notes his surprise to her response
about the myths he had heard about Syrian anti-Semitism :

"Then I mentioned all the stories I had heard about how badly the
Jews were treated in Syria, and when I asked her where she thought
they came from, she replied in an almost malevolent tone: 'I think
that it's Zionist propaganda.'" [WALLACE, M., 1984, pl. 285]





Sept 15, 2007

Eva Herman, David Duke and Thus Speaketh Grimm

By Patrick Grimm

Eva Herman is an attractive blonde-haired, blue-eyed Aryan-looking (Oi
vey! The Jewish horrors!) talk show host who has lost her job in the
last few days for merely bringing up the fact that the National
Socialist government under Adolf Hitler encouraged German motherhood
through social policy and economic incentives, something that these
media Jews hate, almost as much as they hate Jesus Christ and not
flying in first class. Herman was quoted as stating in Der Spiegel
magazine that "It was a gruesome time with a totally crazy and highly
dangerous leader who led the Germans into ruin as we all know. But
there was at the time also something good, and that is the values,
that is the children, that is the families, that is a togetherness -
it was all abolished, there was nothing left." [1]

First off, what other country's citizens would be forced by the
proprieties of the Jewish media powers-that-be to qualify any
statement about a past leader of their nation the Jews don't like by
referring to him as "totally crazy and highly dangerous"? After all,
in the former Soviet Union, past Communist leaders such as Stalin and
Lenin, who were accused of far greater excesses than Hitler, are often
referred to with fondness by those citizens burned by the present
economic realities of Jewish oligarchic power and the greatest
plundering of a nation in history.

Right off the bat, we see that the Jews determine the rules of the
dialectic, and history and memory will both be savaged to serve their
interests. The fact that Hitler revived the economy of Germany after
pulling down the Jewish banking powers and bypassing them completely
through bartering with other countries can never be praised. Why?
Because the Jews didn't like Hitler and Jewish lives are infinitely
valuable. Even Gentile lives expended saving Jews or protecting them,
are footnotes, scribblings in the margins of historiography.

David Duke discussed this little brouhaha in his most recent
commentary. As is often the case, Dr. Duke puts things succinctly into
perspective: "People sometimes ask why I so frequently bring up the
Jewish extremist issue in almost every discussion. The Spiegel article
shows how they themselves constantly use this issue to make Europeans
feel guilty about our desire for our own survival. Spiegel quotes a
`Holocaust survivor' who said that Herman's comments were, `The worst
thing I have heard for a long time.' Somehow, `gas chambers' are
inserted to an article about the need to strengthen the European
family and increase the European birthrate.

I do believe that hearing about European concern for survival of the
European people is the worst thing that this extremist Jew has heard
in a long time. Unlike the Jewish extremists, though, we here at
DavidDuke.com are not hypocrites. We believe that Jews have a right to
preserve their people, but we also believe that so do we! How ironic
that extremist Jews support the terrorist, Apartheid State of Israel,
and yet constantly condemn Europeans who simply want the survival of
the European people and civilization? The media constantly support the
idea of a Jewish State for the Jewish people, but condemn the idea of
a German State for the German people and they would condemn even a
European Union for the European people!" [2]

Yes, only a radical Jew, full of self-delusion and perverse
"specialness" could turn a commentary about the plummeting birthrates
of Germans and all European peoples into a chance to beat the drums of
his own persecution, as if World War II is only a footnote when
compared to the fairy tale holy writ that is the "Holocaust" story,
bent and stretched and fashioned Hollywood-style by the liar Elie
Wiesel until it resembles more an Old Testament plague than anything
that could have actually occurred in the real world, where the rules
of science still apply.

There is no evidence whatsoever to prop up the story of "gas chambers"
that this Jew whinnies and crows about, but there is ample and
irrefutable evidence proving that politically organized Jews do hate
white European peoples and have been the architects of the policies
now used to bring about our genocide. There is no smoking gun when it
comes to the "Holocaust" but there are a multitude of smoldering
weapons and lots of gun powder residue revealing the ethnicity of the
tribe of people who have a long history of hatred for white people,
Aryan people, if I may be so bold. They, the radical Jews, do, without
a doubt, stand to benefit from our extinction.

But Eva Herman is the sacrificial lamb, albeit a pretty one, an
example made and a human media message sent to other whites who dare
to leave the corner of fearfulness and silence that we have been
painted into by those Jews holding the rollers and brushes. Germany,
like most of the European world, lives under punishing Jewish
Bolshevik rule, their thwarted and compromised media even more firmly
"locked-down" than it was before World War II, their free speech
silenced and their rights as citizens given over to Jewish tyrants.
Instead of the positive economic incentives of a National Socialist
government, pushing motherhood, stable families and a strong economy
free of Jewish avarice, the education system works to dissolve German
families and failing that, to pervert and sicken them.

In an article entitled "German Government Publication Promotes
Incestuous Pedophilia as Healthy Sex Ed" John-Henry Westen writes:

"Booklets from a subsidiary of the German government's Ministry for
Family Affairs encourage parents to sexually massage their children as
young as 1 to 3 years of age. Two 40-page booklets entitled "Love,
Body and Playing Doctor" by the German Federal Health Education Center
(Bundeszentrale fur gesundheitliche Aufklarung - BZgA) are aimed at
parents - the first addressing children from 1-3 and the other
children from 4-6 years of age.

"Fathers do not devote enough attention to the clitoris and vagina of
their daughters. Their caresses too seldom pertain to these regions,
while this is the only way the girls can develop a sense of pride in
their sex," reads the booklet regarding 1-3 year olds. The authors
rationalize, "The child touches all parts of their father's body,
sometimes arousing him. The father should do the same." [3]

Hmmm, it would seem that any observant individual who sees the world-
wide pattern of Jewish behavior can probably hazard a guess as to the
ethnic identity of the authors of these "helpful" little sex ed
manuals provided to German parents. Yep, back in the Weimar Republic,
you don't know how unlucky you are! But be that as it may, these
manuals make one thing as clear as a bell. The Jewish supremacists
hate white people. Gas chambers are portrayed as a ghastly genocidal
crime against humanity, but dysfunctional and disintegrated European
families, evaporated white genotypes and the "death of whiteness" are
pleasurable eventualities, savory scenarios to the powers of
international Zionism. They believe that our race is the only bulwark
against their complete domination of the globe and they are right. We
can stop them if we can only survive, only reproduce. Thus speaketh
Grimm, "we must do so."

Eva Herman is another victim of the Jews. Why was she chosen to be
served up bloodlessly, though blatantly, on the altar of media
sacrifice? That's simple. She is a rarity in Europe, an enlightened,
racially aware and traditionalist white woman, fully cognizant of what
is necessary to save the German people (and all European people) from
the quandary they are in because of low birth rates and the havoc
wreaked by a media and establishment with alien and incompatibly
exotic values and folkways. Herman is an anomaly in a media cowed and
docile before the Jewish ideology of multiculturalism, or more
accurately, multiracialism. This ideology is having the desired effect
on both Europe and America. It is sparking fragmentation, is leading
to displacement and finally will end with replacement. To have any
person speak against it will only unite and dynamize the masses, who
are firmly opposed to these Jewish-instigated policies.

David Duke said in his article that he is often asked why he so
frequently brings up the "Jewish extremist issue" when discussing the
crisis of European mankind. I am often asked the same thing, even by
friends who basically agree with me. It's an apt question and one
answered in full by the preposterous firing of Eva Herman. So many of
us "bring up" Jewish extremism because it is the biggest obstacle to
the liberation of Europeans and European-Americans. Our freedom will
never be bought with silence. It will only be secured when this
sinister and deleterious power is lifted from our governments, our
media, our families and our throats.

[1] http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,504790,00.html

[2]
http://www.davidduke.com/general/motherhood-crusader-fired-from-german-telev
ision_2745.html#more-2745

[3] http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/jul/07073008.html


In article <1189752111.557917.214630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
r9htz26vx45@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...


A chapter taken from When Victims Rule: A Critique of
Jewish Pre-Eminence in America

Chapter 11
THE JEWISH COSMOLOGY OF VICTIMHOOD (Part 1)

"I have frequently had hotheaded romantics assume that our family fled
Russia to escape persecution. They seem to think that the only way we
got out was by jumping from ice flow to ice floe across the Dnieper
River, with bloodhoods and the entire Red Army in hot pursuit. No such
thing. We were not persecuted and we left in a quite legal manner with
no more trouble than one would expect from any bureaucracy, including
our own. If that's disappointing, so be it." Isaac Asimov, I. Asimov.
A Memoir. 1994, p. 19

Ask any non-Jewish American what his or her personal link is to the
Roman era, the Dark Ages, the Middle Ages, and other epics of human
history and he will tell you: nothing. He knows nothing about it. And
he doesn't care. For such a late twentieth century American to reflect
on his own roots back to, say, medievalism, is to look with the naked
eye for Mars: it is a vague dot, reputed by others to exist, in the
remotest distance. Indistinct. Unfathomable. Something eternally
elusive, lost forever.

yeah and that explains alot about united states citizens' insanity.

Few Americans can trace their family history more than a few
generations, if that. Throughout anyone's own ancestral lineage,
however, going back deeply into time, there obviously exists their own
share of participants -- as both perpetrators and victims -- in great
and minor wars, massacres, invasions, famines, epidemics, and other
disasters of every kind. Presuming five procreative generations per
century, exponentially, any human being alive today can theoretically
claim direct genetic lineage to over a thousand ancestors back to
1800, over 37,000 people to 1700, over a million back to the year
1600, and over a staggering billion human beings back to 1400 (thirty
generations). Whatever the mathematically realistic number, (and
Jewish history claims 4,000 years) the deeper we go back into history,
the more we must consider the veritable Milky Way of humanity that
preceded us in direct ancestral lineage; people of every imaginable
sort, and they all knew well the melancholic chords of human
suffering, sometimes subtly, sometimes brutally. Every single one of
them.

Today's Americans of French, British, Italian or other European
descent find themselves today lumped together in the generic "white"
American community. Their respective ancestries are stirred together,
gone. Their European origins mean little to them; they are homogenized
in the New World, their identities now expressed -- for better or
worse -- in the icons of George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Billy the
Kid, Babe Ruth, the hallowed Constitution, even McDonald's hamburgers,
or other superficial national icons that ancestrally have nothing
directly to do with them.

i once had a chat with two americans in an online game. they explained
to me that "america" is much scarier than we foreigners realize. To sum
it up they said it is like a horror movie hidden under disneyland.

The typical American's alienation, disinterest, and lack of connection
to distant history is not characteristic of modern Jews. On the
contrary. A stone thrown in spite through a Jewish window in Italy in
the fourteenth century is a stone thrown into Jewish hearts today. The
actions against Jews by desperate thugs in Poland in the eighteenth
century are dumped on Gentile doorsteps in our time by Jews who are
still grieving, still embittered, still seeking redress. And when we
turn, in more recent history, to the bestial deeds of Adolf Hitler to
conquer the world, we find that Jews have pulled tightly in a circle
to proclaim that everything sinister in the whole world malevolently
labors against them, and them only.

Ultimately, it is a central article of modern Jewish faith --
reflecting both secular and religious attitudes, formed and hardened
over the ages -- that to be Jewish is to be always maltreated for
innocence by others. Or, perhaps more correctly to Jewish eyes, as
part of this innocence, being Jewish is to be a victim for the crime
of being superior to their persecutors. This claim to superiority was
originally religiously based, as God's "Chosen People" of Old
Testament tradition. And this Jewish preoccupation -- as being victims
of their self-presumed superiority -- has been passed down,
religiously, over the ages (traditionally epitomized in Jewish
pilgrimage to Jerusalem's Wailing Wall to bemoan their communal fate,
manifest also in the likes of the volume Sefer Yosifon, anonymously
compiled in the tenth century as a litany of Jewish complaints and
miseries). In the aftermath of Hitler's atrocities against Jews during
World War II, this world-view has come to define, more tightly than
any other aspect of Jewish tradition -- and now highly politicized --
modern Jewish self-identity.

But is this true? From the evidence we have already seen, are Jews
correctly depicted as history's consummate, incomparable, and innocent
victims? Have Jews pre-eminently and collectively suffered more than
all other human beings, "victims of centuries of persecution and
bigotry?" [UROFSKY, M., 1978, p. 378] And for no reason?

Here's a typical view of the Eastern European Jewish past, by Judith
Arcana, who discusses the roots of Jewish American poet Grace Paley's
family to the Jews of Russia: "One of Isaac's brothers, Russya, was
killed in a workers demonstration in 1905 ... In the wake of that
death, probably spurred by the retaliatory wave of pogroms, the family
decided to leave Russia. Knowing the unpredictability of royal whim,
Natasha Gutseit, Isaac's widowed mother, sent the young couple to
America before the czar could change his mind and snatch them back
again." [ARCANA, J., 1993, p. 10] Here Arcana, who omits the relevance
of Jewish socialist agitation in Russia as a factor in their
"persecution" [Elsewhere she notes that even both Paley's parents were
socialists, enemies of the Tsarist regime -- p. 9], speculates that
the Russian czar would have interest in "snatching" Jews back to
Russia.

In the American context, "one commonly finds a sentence like this in
many [Jewish] books or articles," says Joshua Rothenberg, "... 'Jews
came to the shores of this country from the ghettos of the shtetlekh
[Eastern European Jewish villages] as a result of the pogroms.' Each
phrase in this sentence is untrue or oversimplified to the point of
untruth. There were no ghettos in 19th century Eastern Europe (except
in the metaphysical sense) ... And the pogroms were not the principal
reason for emigration: proportionately more Jews came to the United
States from Austrian-ruled Galicia -- where there were no pogroms --
than from Tsarist Russia." [ROTHENBERG, p. 3]

"It has been discovered," says Henry Feingold, "that religious
persecution, even its physical manifestations of pogroms, rarely
furnishes sufficient impetus for Jews to uproot themselves. Moreover,
it cannot account for the thousands of Jews who chose to leave areas
relatively free of religious persecution ... [FEINGOLD, p. 60] ...
Historians have taken a closer look at the early acculturation process
and have discovered that the highly touted ability of the Jewish
family to withstand the stresses of transplantation have been
overstated. New studies on Jewish vice and crime and criminality and
the discovery of a relatively high divorce and desertion rate among
immigrant Jews present a picture of a community paying a dear price
for establishing itself." [FEINGOLD, p. 61]

"The lachrymorose recollection of the shtetl, which are still with
us," says Daniel Bell, "fail to recall its narrowness of mind, its
cruelty, especially to schoolchildren (to whom a whole series of
memoirs, such as Solomon Ben Maimon's, testify), and its invidious
stratification." [BELL, Reflections, p. 318] Little remembered is this
oppression of Jews by Jews. "Prior to World War I," adds Rothenburg,
"the Kehilah [Jewish governing bodies] were ruled, in most cases, by
an oligarchy of the rich and the [Jewish] clergy. Their excesses,
especially in the area of indirect taxation (kosher meat, etc.) and
the silencing of the protesting voices of the poor, are well-known and
documented. The Kehilahs remained a source of bitter complaint for the
majority of the Jewish population, which had no say in the conduct of
their own community affairs." [ROTHENBURG, p. 5]

continued

http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2007/09/chapter-11-jewish-cosmology-of.h
tml



continuing:

....American Jews today hold dear many nostalgic "Fiddler on the Roof"-
type myths about their Eastern European ancestors. As, however, Jewish
author Ivan Kalmar notes

"A stalwart Jewish peasant, with a native wit and a naive religiosity,
ever sturdy in the face of unending adversity, he is the epitome of
Jewish nostalgia ... The Fiddler is so much part of the way we
think of our Jewish background ... The Fiddler image has some
basis in reality, but it is also very much part of a nostalgic
reconstruction of our past, an example of what anthropologists
call 'invention of tradition' ... Jewish authors [like Sholem
Aleichem, creator of Fiddler on the Roof] tried to create
stereotypes of the Jews that would identity them with less
wealthy groups who were looked at more favourably by the
greater society. Sholom Aleichem's Tevye [hero of Fiddler
on the Roof] is very much a Ukrainian peasant. To counter
the idea of the Jew as a 'parasite,' Sholom Aleichem presents
Tevye as a dairy farmer, who sells not the Gentile peasant's
products but his own. North American Jews have
enthusiastically accepted the validity of Sholom Aleichem's
Tevye as a metaphor for the Eastern European Jew of old ...
Where finally Tevye finally shows unique character, he
turns out to be a modern Jew. Where he is being a 'typical,'
folksy, traditional East European Jew, he resembles the
romanticized Ukrainian peasant ... Of course, there were
in reality Jewish peasants like Tevye, but compared to the
Slavs, the percentage of Jews who farmed was miniscule."
[KALMER, I., quoted by PRYTULAK, L., UKRAINIAN
ARCHIVES]

"Having ... turned their backs on Poland," notes Jewish scholar Victor
Seidler about modern Jewish perceptions of Eastern European heritage,
"it can be difficult for the second generation [of Jews in America] to
recognize just how Polish their parents were. Things we learned to think
of as 'Jewish' turn out to be Polish." [SEIDLER, V.J., 2000, p. 74]
"Indeed," notes George Mosse, "when the first German-Jewish painter,
Mortiz Oppenheim, painted scenes from the ghetto shortly after
emancipation, it was transformed, as we have seen, into a community
permeated with German middle-class values." [MOSSE, G., 1985, p. 80]

Jewish author Howard Jacobson notes Jewish historic myth-making at an
exhibition of photographs of Eastern European Jews at the University of
Judaism in Los Angeles. Particularly troubling to him was the depiction
of the stereotypically "studious Jew":

"Something is wrong with this exhibition. Something is wrong with
the way we modern Jews idealize a past we wouldn't touch with a
barge-pole if it were offered us again ... Why is Jewish study always
made to look so soulful in these sorts of photographs, so unrelieved,
so unvarious, so fucking miserable and desolating? What is it about
Jewish books that make absorption in them such an invariably
heart-rendering business? What a sell! How have the Jews done it,
how have we persuaded ourselves, but gentiles as well, that anguish
and lamentation and self-abnegation and bodilessness and pathos
attach inalterably and exclusively to our studies? You don't see
[St. Thomas] Aquinas looking into a book like that." [JACOBSON, H.,
1995, p. 192-193]

The distinguished Jewish historian, Salo Baron, of Columbia University,
whose twelve-volume Social and Religious History of the Jews is the most
extensive Jewish history by a single author in existence, argued a view
that, post-Holocaust, has been swept to the wayside by modern Jewish
discourse. His view was that Jewish suffering in the European Middle
Ages, and throughout history, has been exaggerated. That is, that the
Jews of Europe, as a group, in comparison to their Christian neighbors,
actually had a better life in the Middle Ages, to the 20th century. For
all the claims of massacres and pogroms, according to surviving
documents, the Jewish population actually grew more rapidly than the
Gentiles around them. [LIBERLES, p. 42] This accelerated in later
centuries. "The two and a half centuries from 1660 to 1914," says Baron,
"the Jewish population grew numerically some fifteen times ... while
mankind at-large increased by only 250 per cent, Europe by 350 per cent
...." [BARON, H and J.H., p. 50] This thesis, addressing later years, is
supported by a non-Jewish scholar of the Ukraine, Orest Subtleny:

"Throughout the nineteenth century, especially in its latter part, the
Jews experienced a tremendous population rise. Between 1820 and
1880, while the general population of the [Russian] empire rose by
87%, the number of Jews increased by 150%. On the Right Bank,
this rise was even more dramatic: between 1844 and 1913 the number
of its inhabitants rose by 265% while the Jewish population increased
by 844%! Religious sanctions of large families, less exposure to
famines, war, and epidemics, and a low mortality rate because of
communal self-help and the availability of doctors largely accounted
for this extraordinary increase." [SUBTLENY, p. 276]

Salo Baron argued that his people, the Jews, were so privileged,
relative to non-Jews throughout the European Middle Ages, that with the
coming of the Enlightenment era "emancipation" and "equality" amounted
to "a net loss [to Jews] in status and lifestyle." [SCHORSCH, p. 383]
Elsewhere, he wrote that "it is likely ... that even the average
medieval Jew, compared to his average Christian contemporary ... was the
less unhappy and destitute creature -- less unhappy and destitute not
only by his own consciousness, but even if measured by such objective
criteria as standards of living, cultural amenities, and protection
against individual starvation and disease." [LINDEMANN, Esau's, p. 11]

"Throughout the Middle Ages," notes David Biale, "the Jews enjoyed
considerable influence in many of the lands in which they lived ... In
addition to their interest Court politics, these Jews participated in
political life in defense of Jewish interests." [BIALE, POWER p. 69]
"The situation of the Jews in the first half of the Middle Ages," says
Abram Leon, "was ... extremely favorable. The Jews were considered as
being a part of the upper classes in society and their juridicial
position was not perceptibly different from that of the nobility."
[LEON, p. 128] "At least some of the Jewish dress of the Middle Ages,"
adds Biale, "such as the Jewish hat, originated out of choice rather
than compulsion ... The yellow patch [worn by Jews] ... was not
originally intended as an instrument for segregating and humiliating the
Jews ... but to proclaim publicly that its wearer enjoyed official
protection." [BIALE, POWER, p. 67]

One of the privileges Jews enjoyed throughout Europe until relatively
modern history was that they didn't have to serve in the local military
organizations. "During the continuous wars of the sixteenth,
seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries," wrote Baron, " ... the Jews were
neutral and suffered few losses. If they had been combatants they might
have lost more than in all the pogroms." [LIBERLES, p. 42] Yet Medieval
Jews were allowed the extremely significant privilege of carrying
weapons, a privilege equal to knights and one to which all commoners
(the overwhelming majority of the population) were forbidden. [GOLDBERG,
p. 123] Baron also noted that, while there were certainly Jews who
suffered poverty, the surrounding Christian population was worse off.
And if the Jewish ghettos were, as widely claimed, abject holes of
enforced degradation, "is it not remarkable that the most typical Ghetto
in the world, the Frankfurt Judengasse, produced in the pre-Emancipation
period the greatest banking house in history?" [LIBERLES p. 45]

"The Jews," says Israel Shahak,

"in spite of all the persecution to which they were subjected, formed
an integral part of the privileged classes ... Jewish historiography,
especially in English, is misleading on this point inasmuch as it tends
to focus on Jewish poverty and anti-Jewish discrimination ... The
poorest Jewish craftsman, peddlar, landlord's steward, or petty cleric
was immeasurably better off than a serf [most of the non-Jewish
population]. This was especially true in those European countries
where serfdom persisted until the nineteenth century, whether in a
partial or extreme form: Prussia, Austria (including Hungary), Poland,
and the Polan lands taken by Russia. And it is not without significance
that, prior to the beginning of the great Jewish migration of modern
times (around 1889), a large majority of all Jews were living in those
areas and that their most important social function there was to
mediate the oppression of peasants on behalf of the nobility and
the Crown." [SHAHAK, p. 52-53]

Jews in Eastern Europe understood the people around them as,
categorically, persecutors. And "the Jews saw their persecutors as an
inferior race," noted World Zionist Organization President Nahum
Goldmann, "Most of my [physician] grandfather's patients [in Lithuania]
were peasants. Every Jew felt ten or a hundred times the superior of
these lowly tillers of the soil; he was cultured, learned Hebrew, knew
the Bible, studied the Talmud -- in other words he knew that he stood
head and shoulders above these illiterates." [GOLDMANN, 1978, p. 13]

"It would never have occurred to us," said one Jewish immigrant to the
United States, "that the Gentile world [in Eastern Europe] was happier
.... On the contrary, we considered our world happier and finer." "We
thought they were unfortunate," says another, "We were above them, this
was the feeling [towards peasants]." [MORAWSKA, p. 17] In the face of
the commonly cherished belief among modern Jews that their brethren of
Eastern Europe were terribly and uniformly impoverished, it is a fact
that Jews were doing so well (relative to the non-Jews around them) that
non-Jewish servants in Jewish households were common.

Apart from racist folk tales, Zborowski and Herzog note that most Jewish
children in Eastern Europe learned fragments of the surrounding non-
Jewish culture via the Gentile servants in their homes. "These
impressions [of non-Jewish life]," the scholars write, "[were] available
not only to the children of the rich, for [Jewish] women of modest
circumstances who worked in a store or at the market often had the help
of a [non-Jewish] peasant girl in the house." [ZBOROWSKI, p. 155]
"[Jewish life] was certainly better than the life of the Russian
peasant," remarks Howard Sachar. [SACHAR, p. 215]

"We were luckier than most of our fellow-Jews in being able to afford
'servants,' if that is the real name for them," declares Chaim Weizmann,
an immigrant from the "Pale" of Russia, an agitator for how bad Jews had
it in his place of birth, and the first president of modern Israel, "...
[My second servant] who outlived the first and was with us for something
like thirty-five years, was a lovable peasant by the name of Yakim ...
He had learned to sing, after a fashion, the Jewish national anthem,
Hatikvah; and in moments of enthusiasm would cry out: 'Come, little
ones, let us sing Tikvah!'" [WEIZMAN, C., 1949, p. 22]

Elsewhere, Weizman adds:

"The teachers and governing authorities of the schools within the Pale
[an area of Russia] were typical Russian officials, and as such, not
free from corruption. So the rich Jew would use his gold to pave the way
for his boy to enter the school ... There were occasions when a rich Jew
would hire ten non-Jewish candidates (at times rather oddly selected) to
sit for the entrance examination at the local school, and thus make room
for one Jewish pupil -- needless to say his own son or a protege."
[WEIZMAN, C., 1949, p. 31]

"Even when the Jewish common people were known to be desperately poor,"
adds Albert Lindemann, "as in Austrian Galicia or parts of the Jewish
Pale of Settlement in tsarist Russia, their overall per capita wealth
still seems to have been greater than that of non-Jews, mostly peasants,
among whom they lived." [LINDEMANN, Esau's, p. 21] "On the whole," says
sociologist Stephen Steinberg, "Eastern European Jews [prior to
immigration to America in the late nineteenth century] were
unquestionably poor, though decidedly better off than the surrounding
peasant population." [STEINBERG, p. 97]

What, one wonders, is to be read between this relativity of being
"poor?" How poor could Jews have really been if they were "decidedly
better off" than the non-Jewish peasants (who were most of the Eastern
European population), even hiring Polish servants for their homes?

Another part of Jewish popular mythology is that the Jews were forced
against their will into ghettos in Europe. The widely-believed
accusation that Jews were forcibly segregated, particularly into
ghettos, is a distortion of historical fact. In the Middle Ages most
Christian towns themselves had walls, gates, and locks for protection
from outsiders. The enclosed Jewish ghetto was, in origin, a Jewish
construction, conceived for both protection and self-segregation from
the taint of non-Jewish ways.

"In the thirteenth century," writes Max Weinrich, "segregated living
quarters for Jews were made compulsory. The fact of the matter is that
separate Jewish streets had existed all along ... If the Jews lived
together long before segregated living quarters were imposed upon them,
then their segregation must have been voluntary. It was. Living apart,
no matter how bizarre it may appear in the light of present day concepts
and attitudes, was part of the 'privileges' accorded to the Jews in
conforming with their own wishes." [WEINRICH, p. 105]

As president Nachum Goldmann of the World Zionist Organization notes:

"It is wrong to say that the goyim forced the Jews to separate
themselves
themselves from other societies. When the Christians defined the
ghetto limits, Jews lived there already." [GOLDMANN, N., 1978, p. 66]

For centuries Jews isolated themselves from their surrounding non-Jewish
neighbors except, of course, for the necessities of commerce. "Had the
Jews not possessed a deep-rooted conviction of the truth of their
religion," says Jacob Katz, "and had they not actively sought to
maintain their separate identity, the tendencies inherent in medieval
conditions would inevitably have ended by breaking down the social
barrier erected by Jewish ritual." [KATZ, Ex, p. 40] "In Orthodox
Judaism," wrote anthropologist Maurice Fishberg in 1911, "a Jew must not
eat at the same table with a Gentile, nor any food prepared by the
latter; must not eat or drink from dishes, with spoons, forks, knives,
etc. which have been used by a Gentile; must not drink wine with the
container of which has been touched by a Christian, Mohammadan, or
heathen ... I know Jews to feel nauseated and even vomit when told that
the food they have consumed was not kosher. ... It was the intense
tribal spirit engendered by his religion which kept the Jew from
intimate contact with the Gentiles, more than the laws promulgated by
Christian states for the purpose." [FISHBERG, p. 536]

"We [Jews] formed the ghetto ourselves," wrote the Zionist leader
Vladamir Zabotinsky, " ... voluntarily, for the same reason for which
Europeans in Shanghai established their separate quarter, to be able to
live their own way." [KORBANSKI, p. 8] "The Ghetto was rather a
privilege than a disability," notes J. O. Hertzler, "and sometimes was
claimed by the Jews as a right when its demolition was threatened."
[HERTZLER, p. 73] Boas Evron cites the work of fellow Israeli scholar,
Yehezkel Kaufmann, in noting that

"the popular assumption that external anti-Jewish pressures forced
group identify and exclusivity on the Jews is unconvincing, since
historical evidence shows that Jewish exclusivity and aloofness
preceded outside hostility and were thus its cause, not its result ...
Jewish communities were always borne by host societies ... They
never shared in political, military, administrative, or technological
responsibilities." [EVRON, p. 53]

In articles in 1928 and 1932, Cecil Roth, one of the foremost Jewish
scholars of his day, set out to debunk the Jewish myths of incessant
persecution by non-Jews through the ages. "In the first place," wrote
Roth, ".... the Jew has always tended to regard as a martyr all persons
who died at Gentile hands ... even if he died in a drunken brawl ... All
those [Jews] who met a violent end, no matter under what circumstances,
were included under the head of martyrs in the Jewish popular
consciousness and recollection." [ROTH, Most, p. 136-137]

This martyr tradition and schema has even been outrageously used, quite
the same, with the identical religious base, in Orthodox Jewish
messianic political quarters in our own day. Baruch Goldberg, the
American-born Orthodox Israeli doctor who murdered 29 Arabs with an
automatic weapon this decade as they prayed in a Hebron mosque, and who
was subsequently beaten to death, was proclaimed by some Jews to be
kadosh. (This word is commonly translated as meaning "holy;" it also has
connotations meaning "separate" or "apart.") "A Jew who is killed
because he is a Jew," wrote Dov Leor (a rabbi for the messianic Gush
Emunim organization) about Goldberg's violent death, "must certainly be
called ... a holy martyr ... without investigating their previous
conduct." [LEOR, p. 61] "Baruch Goldstein was the greatest Jew alive,"
declared a Jerusalem teacher, Samuel Hacohen, "not in one way, but in
every way ... There are no innocent Arabs here, and thank God that one
Jewish hero reminded us that it had become almost legal to kill Jews in
the street. He is the only one who could do it, the only one who was 100
percent perfect. He was no crazy ... Killing isn't nice, but sometimes
it is very necessary." Rabbi Yaacov Perin also announced at Goldberg's
funeral that "One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail."
[BROWNFELD, A., 3-99, p. 85]

A 1908 pamphlet, notes Cecil Roth, was widely circulated in the Jewish
community under the title, Jews Hanged or Burned Alive in Rome....
Because They Refused to Change Their Faith. Of the hanged Jews listed,
all but one were in fact executed for specific crimes, a harshness
rendered no differently to any other people of past eras. "This
instance," says Roth, "... is symptomatic of the attitude which Jewish
historiography has consistently adopted. Any popular attack or any
governmental persecution in which Jews were victims is set down outright
as an expression of anti-Semitic sentiment."

In another example, in 1278, on charges of money clipping [skimming gold
or silver content from coinage], 267 Jews were hanged in London. This
punishment was not merited out to Jews as Jews, but to those who were
disproportiontely "in possession of the greater amount of ready money."
Those who accumulated money in the Jewish money-lending and usury era
happened to be overwhelmingly Jews, but also included a lesser number of
Christian goldsmiths and such who were similarly arrested and executed.
"What seems at first blush," says Roth, "[to be] an act of sheer
persecution appears in a closer examination one of primitively sharp
justice." [ROTH, p. 137]

In the early years of Christianity, in Alexandria (of today's Egypt),
attacks upon Jews rendered in Jewish historical consciousness as acts of
anti-Semitism were really what Roth says today would be called "an
interracial riot." [ROTH, p. 138]

Roth underscored the precarious existence of all peoples' lives in the
Middle Ages:

"The modern reader frequently fails to realize that, generally speaking,
life in the Middle Ages was not secure. For every section of the
population the probabilities of meeting a violent death were high, even
in times of comparative peace. Country people were continually subject
to the onslaught of bandits or of lawless barons, as well as the
marchings and counter marchings of armed forces. [Even] city dwellers
.... [ran] the risk of sack and wholesale murder. The whole of medieval,
and a great part of modern, history is studded with instance of the
sort:
the devastation of Attila, the Scourge of God; the ravaging of the Vexin
by William the Conqueror; the sack of a score of German cities during
the Thirty Years War. There were frequently cases when only a minority
of the population survived, the vast majority being piteously massacred.
These events and their like should be borne in mind when one considers
the vicissitudes of any particular racial or religious minority. The
scarlet
of Jewish persecution does not stand out on a ground of virginal white.
[ROTH, p. 138]

In medieval Poland, says Bernard Weinyrb, "In an epoch and a country
where most of the time people were in danger of attacks by Tatars and
Turks, of wars, soldiers, and robber gangs on the roads, insecurity
became the normal way of life for people who had never known anything
different." [WEINRYB, p. 159]

The miseries caused by the sack of Rome in 1527, Christian crusades
against Muslim-controlled Jerusalem in 1096, Leon in 1197, Malaga in
1487, Naples in 1494, Padua in 1509, Tunis in 1535, or "a hundred other
occasions" were at least equivalent tragedies to Jewish descriptions of
"Jewish martyrdom." [ROTH, p. 138]

"It is probably the fact," says Roth, "that in the course of the
medieval wars and disorders, the Jews normally suffered more than any
other section of the population. This was not necessarily, however,
because they were Jews, but simply because they belonged to the more
opulent class ... on the capture of a town (by an army), the first
objective of the assailants would naturally be the streets of the
goldsmiths and the street of the Jews." [ROTH, p. 139]

Likewise, Jews -- perceived as affluent and exploitive outsiders to
native populaces --suffered the same way at the hands of mobs as did
Italian traders in London in 1439 and 1455, and at the "Hansa
Steelyard" in 1494. Jews were also subject to random "acts of rapine,"
like any Christian -- or other community -- of the Middle Ages, as
happened in the Jewish part of Asolo, in northern Italy, in 1547.
Perpetrators in that case were punished by the central government.

While Jews were sometimes required to wear special badges of
identification in the European Middle Ages, it was a norm of
discrimination for the era. Muslims also had to wear such marks of
"outsider" distinction in Christian societies. Conversely, in the Muslim
world, Christian communities were also faced with such laws and
legislation of discrimination, sometimes even in clothing. And of course
Jewish law itself has various nomenclature and attendant rules for
treatment of various categories of non-Jews as second-class, or worse,
people. (Even in modern Israel, Arabs are discriminatorily noted as such
on national identity cards).

"Some current histories," said Roth in 1932, "appear to assume the Jews
were sole victims of the Spanish Inquisition ... Strictly, this is so
far from the truth that a precisian might retort that [the Jews] never
came under the [Inquisition's] scope, save in exceptional cases, since
the activities were essentially confined to [Christian] apostates and
renegades." [ROTH, p. 141] Those "Jews" who risked trouble were those
among the Marranos/Conversos, who disingenuously represented themselves
as Christians and were thereby subject to the same scrutinization for
religious conformance as that directed upon any other Christian. Widely
targeted were Christian heretics, not the Judaic faith. As M. Hirsh
Goldberg notes,

"Contrary to popular belief, Jews who openly remained Jews were
not tortured or killed as part of the inquisition proceedings. The
Inquisition was specifically authorized by the Church to root out
heresy among Catholics, so only heretical Christians and Jewish
converts to Christianity accused of secretly reverting to Judaism
were prosecuted." [GOLDBERG, M. H., 1979, p. 16] "[T]he Holy Inquistion
in Portugal," notes Arnold Wiznitzer, "did not persecute Jews who never
had been Catholics. Only persons of Jewish origin who had been born
Catholic, or those, born Jews and baptised later, who had deserted
Catholicism openly or secretly were subject to the Inquisition since
they were considered as being apostates." [WIZNITZER, A., 1957, p. 64]
"The Inquistion," notes Joachim Prinz, "is considered one of the many
traumatic experiences of Jewish history, and as such, it is always
spoken of with dread. But, of course, the Inquistion had no power over
Jews at all. It was established for the purpose of dealing with
Christians who had deviated from their faith. The Marranos who were
called into account for their secret practices appeared not as Jews but
as allegedly heretical Chrisitans ... No unconverted Jews were ever
called to the tribunals." [PRINZ, J., 1973, p. 44]

"Living under the Inquisition," adds Goldberg in another volume,

"caused Jews to make some curious adjustments, as can be seen
in the family of Manoel Pereira Coutinho, who had five daughters --
all nuns in a convent in Lisbon -- while in Hamburg his sons were
living openly as Jews." [GOLDBERG, M. H., 1976, p. 109]

"All Jews know about the Inquisition," wrote David Goldstein, a Jewish
apostate, "but of Jewish [-perpetrated] injustices they know hardly
anything." [GOLDSTEIN, p. 117] "The name of Torquemada," wrote Jewish
author John Cournos in 1937, "the loathsome Grand Inquisitor, was a
byword among us children, as it was in other Jewish households."
[GOLDSTEIN, p. 117] This view that the Inquisition somehow centered on
Jews still remains widespread in the community today, as proclaimed in a
1990 issue of the American Jewish Congress magazine devoted to the
subject of Jewish identity. Ignoring the Christian target groups of the
heresy trials, Zvi Bekarman remarked that "The Inquisition is brought to
us as one more proof of the suffering of the Jews." [BEKERMAN, p. 14]

Despite all the Jewish lamenting of pogroms and massacres upon their
ancestors, the Catholic-Protestant massacre of St. Bartholomew's Day in
the 1500's was as spectacularly horrible as any Jewish medieval
misfortune to that time. Nor, adds Roth, "was persecution of the Jews in
its acutest form [ever] systematic." (The later World War II Holocaust
scenario, which of course was systematic, will be addressed later at
length in its own chapter).

Jews were often blamed for the epidemic of the Plague and the Black
Death that swept Europe in the Middle Ages (while Jewish communities
were relatively free from the disease, [HERTZLER, p. 95] but such causal
connection to medieval minds was not to the detriment of Jews only. Non-
Jews were also accused of, and murdered for, causing the Plague in
Palermo in 1526, in Germany in 1530, 1545, and 1574, at Casale Monferrat
in 1536, and other places throughout Europe. In Breslau, in 1349 sixty
Jews were executed for having caused a town fire, "but," says Roth,
"when one recalls that 300 years afterwards the Great Fire of London was
[blamed upon] the Papists, one realizes that the Jews had no monopoly on
unjust accusations." [ROTH, p. 144]

Jewish communities themselves had irrational superstitions to scapegoat
others and to explain disease and other misfortunes. Says Zborowski and
Herzog:

"If an epidemic strikes the shtetl, prayers are, of course, offered up.
Other steps consist chiefly in marrying off two orphans or cripples,
so that God will be mollified by the good deeds of the worshippers...
Whenever there was an epidemic in the shtetl they used to blame it
on peoples' sins. They tried to find the guilty ones and expose them
to the public ... Another method for getting rid of an epidemic was
to get two orphans if possible and to marry them off on the cemetery
...." [ZBOROWSKI, p. 224]

Throughout Europe, "it was.... dangerous to be an old woman in the
sixteenth and seventeenth centuries"' when witch hunts put 100,000
unfortunates on trial for sorcery in Germany alone. [ROTH, p. 145] Some
30,000 such victims are reputed to have been burned alive or torn to
pieces in England, and over a two hundred year period in Scotland, an
average of two hundred "witches" were burned at the stake each year.
Throughout Europe gypsies were sporadically singled out for persecution
and blame, and various Christians and other non-Jews from time to time
were executed for the charge of cannibalism.

Lest modern Jews feel too smug in the brutal superstitions of the
ancient Gentiles, the Talmud itself notes an instance when eighty Jewish
women were hung at one time at the instigation of a fellow Jew, "Simeon
the Son of Shetach," in Ashkelon for the crime of being witches.
[HARRIS, p. 174] When coming across a witch, the Talmud recommends that
the passerby "should mutter thus, 'May a potsherd of boiling dung be
stuffed in your mouths, you ugly witches!'" [HARRIS, p.189] Some rabbis
even opined that a witch may be either male or female, but "most women
are witches." [HARRIS, p. 190] Even "the best among women," said Rabbi
Shimon ben Yochai, "is a witch." [HARRIS, p. 191]

The Talmud also details the various manners of stoning, strangling or
beheading Jewish "blasphemers and idolaters." Such criminals were also
buried up to their knees in manure, and their mouths forced open by
strangling. Molten lead could then be poured "into his bowels." [HARRIS,
p. 170]

The persistence of the Jewish mythology of unique persecution, says
Roth, has much to do with their longevity and communal dispersal
throughout Europe and the world. The persecution of the Albigensians of
France, for instance, is known by hardly anyone today because their
destruction was singularly localized, they were completely wiped out,
and there is no one interested in heralding their suffering. Likewise
the Waldenses of France, and various others. "The Jews," notes Roth,
"are an inseparable element in the history of every country in Europe
.... and thus have an advantage, as it were, of a superior publicity
service; and no historian, even a Gentile, could fail to be impressed by
this insistent, pathetic, unique record." [ROTH, p. 147]

Roth goes to the essence of the Jewish mythos of communal agony:

"In the classical period ... with its holocausts and heroes, the lot of
the Jewish people was much the same as that of the ancient Britons,
the Iberians, and the Gauls; and the leaders of those peoples' struggles
for freedom deserve to be remembered as much as the Jewish martyrs
who are commemorated each year on the ninth of Ab. But this is far
from the case. Generally, they are forgotten, save by a few industrious
antiquarians; and they have no place today in the proud memories of
any people. The reason is very plain. The races for which they fought
are long since dead. The Jews are still alive." [ROTH, p. 147]

These insightful observations were written by Roth in 1932. The rise of
German fascism and its institutionalized inhumanity was still only
rising. Yet we can see here in Roth's unusually honest overview of
Jewish history the broader, foundational context for current Jewish
thinking about themselves to this day. Of course the so-called Holocaust
of World War II has completely solidified the traditional view of the
persecution of Jewry and obliterated Roth's broadly realistic brand of
Jewish historiography.

To a now militant Jewish polemic, their community's European experience
in World War II merely confirms the Jewish mythos of unique and eternal
victimization and martrydom. It is monolithic, irrefutable, immutable,
and immoveable: Jews argue they were uniquely "singled out." There will
be a great deal more about the Holocaust and its part in Jewish identity
in its own chapter. For immediate purposes, it is enough here to
recognize the historical context for modern Jewry's fundamental self-
conception: that of humankind's foremost -- and superlative -- victims,
passed along as part of religious faith century after century, reified
in Jewish cosmology at every turn.

Roth's early 1930's view, in the context of rising Nazi fascism and
worry about anti-Semitism spreading in America, has been completely
muted in our own day, and Jewish apologetics about Jewish identity and
history began rising in direct proportion to the gravity of the growing
German threat. By 1941, a Jewish author, Oscar Janowsky, reviewed -- in
the same Jewish journal that earlier published Roth's critiques of the
Jewish victimization cosmology -- two new books that championed Jewish
history. Each book was authored by well-respected Jewish scholars. One
of them was Cecil Roth. Janowsky's title for his article was
"Apologetics for Our Time." In the context of German Nazism, even Roth
was swallowed by the demands for Jewish positive image-making against
all and any self-critical Jewish commentary. "Both authors," wrote
Janowsky, "would readily concede that the purpose [of these books] was
not to write 'history' of the accepted variety. Our age requires
apologetics, and this sad need has been filled by the authors."
[JANOWSKY, p. 225] This "sad need" was so great that a 1951 volume
entitled The Hebrew Impact on Western Civilization even stated bluntly
in its very first sentence: "This book is a book of propaganda." [RUNES,
D., p. vii]

In 1947, Milton Steinberg wrote a volume, Basic Judaism, explaining the
faith for both Jews and "those many non-Jews who happen to be curious
about Judaism." [STEINBERG, p. viii] Here Steinberg's apologetic, in
doing his part to engender a positive Jewish public image (like so many
others to our own day), was grossly untrue: "Judaism is totally unaware
of race. Though the Tradition loves to trace the House of Israel to the
Patriarchs, blood descent is no factor in its calculations." [STEINBERG,
M., p. 99]

With World War II and the disaster that befell humanity -- and the Jews
within it -- looming soon over Europe, this apologetic methodology (as
well as a resultant Jewish militancy) about Jewish history has continued
in a rarely interrupted straight line to the present day. (Examine, for
example, the gushingly laudatory content of the popular 1999 bestseller
by a non-Jewish author: The Gifts of the Jews). In fact, the mythology
of perpetual Jewish victimhood was well along as an exploitable tool by
American Jews and Zionists as a political devise at the beginning of the
Twentieth Century, where Jewish woe centered upon anti-Jewish riots and
attacks in Eastern Europe, particularly in Russia. "Some of the
atrocities [against Jews] initially reported," writes Albert Lindemann,
"were exaggerated or simply did not occur, and some Jews made false
claims in the hope of getting relief money from Western Europe and
America." [LINDEMANN, p. 154]

Many of the exaggerations were also created to enhance Zionist
propaganda to garner sympathy and support for a Jewish state in Israel.
An important target of Zionist propaganda and historical exaggeration
was American Jews. "You have to speak to American Jews in
superlatives," remarked Nachum Goldmann, for many years the president of
both the World Zionist Organization and World Jewish Congress, "Cool,
balanced, analysis makes no impression on them, and exaggeration is
almost indispensable." [GROSE, p. 162] Elsewhere, in 1978 he noted that
his Zionist group alone had spent "millions of dollars on propaganda."
[GOLDMANN, N., 1978, p. 63]

A pioneer strategist in the use of the accusation of anti-Semitism as a
propaganda device was Theodore Herzl, a Viennese journalist and
playwright, the man most credited for the successful promotion of the
Jewish "return to Israel" Zionist ideology. Herzl "understood the true
nature of propaganda," notes former Israeli diplomat, Moshe Leshem," of
the emotional appeal." "In truth ... noise amounts to a great deal,"
Herzl noted in his diary, "A sustained noise is in itself a noteworthy
fact, world history is nothing but noise." [LESHEM, p. 85]

Among the most reported Russian anti-Jewish pogrom sites at the turn of
the century was Kishinev. (This incident led to the creation of the
Jewish lobbying agency, the American Jewish Committee in 1903). [HALKIN,
p. 54] Chaim Weitzmann, another Zionist activist and the first President
of the state of Israel, wrote to a member of the wealthy Jewish
Rothschild family (instrumental in funding early Jewish settlements in
pre-Israel Palestine):

"Eleven years ago ... I happened to be in the cursed town of Kishinev
.... In a group of about 100 Jews we defended the Jewish quarter with
revolvers in our hand, defended women and girls ... We slept in the
cemetery -- the only safe place and we saw 80 corpses brought in,
mutilated dead...?

"Thus Weizmann," says Albert Lindemann, "reports that he personally saw
eighty mutilated corpses in a single place, when the death toll for the
entire city was later generally recognized to be forty-five. But there
is another problem with the account he provides. It is pure fantasy.
Weizmann was in Warsaw at the time." [LINDEMANN, p. 164]

The long -- and continuing -- Jewish defamation of Poles and Poland, as
part of a broad Zionist propaganda policy and secular Jewish
victimization theology, has been going on for a long time. For all
western Jewry's complaints about massive Polish violence against Polish
Jewry, in 1919 Hugh Gibson, the United states minister to Warsaw, wrote
that, "It is ridiculous as we are told about every incident where the
Jew gets the worst of it and a great many incidents that never happened
at all. These yarns are exclusively of foreign manufacture for anti-
Polish purposes." Two prominent and powerful American Zionists -- Louis
Brandeis and Felix Frankfurter (both United States Supreme Court
justices) -- confronted Gibson to complain about his dispatches to
Washington. "They complained that my reports on the Jewish question had
gone round the world and undone their work [in proclaiming enormous
violent Polish anti-Semitism]," said Gibson,

"... They finally said that I had stated that the stories of excesses
against
the Jews were exaggerated, to which I replied that they certainly were
and I should think any Jew would be glad to know it ... [They] seemed
to be interested in agitation for its own sake rather than in learning
the
situation ... Their efforts were concentrated on an attempt to bully me
into accepting the mixture of information and misinformation which
they have adopted as the basis of their propaganda ... Felix handed
me a scarcely veiled threat that the Jews would try to prevent my
confirmation by the Senate [then pending] ... They made it clear to
me that they do not care to have any diagnosis made that is not based
entirely on Jewish statements as to conditions and events and doesn't
accept them at face value. If they are not ready to go into the question
honestly I don't see how they can hope to accomplish anything for their
people... [American Jews have embarked upon] a conscienceless and
cold-blooded plan to make the condition of the Jews in Poland so bad
they must turn to Zionism for relief." [GROSE, p. 94-95]

In 1923 the United States Vice Consul to Warsaw, Monroe Kline, added
that "It is true that the Pole hates the Jew ... The Jew in business
oppresses the Pole to a far greater extent than does the Pole oppress
the Jew in a political way." [GROSE, p. 95]

More recently, Leonard Fein notes Jewish fears of assimilation that
could erase them as a people, and the emotional cloud that informs
Jewish perception of the facts of history:

"Deep down -- and sometimes not so very deep -- we [Jews] still
believe that we depended on the pogroms and persecutions to
keep us a people, and that we have not the fibre to withstand
the lures of a genuine open society. It is seduction, not rape,
that we fear the most, and nowhere is the seducer more blatant,
less devious, than here in America." [in SILBERMAN, p. 165]

The Jewish limited historical memory (and corresponding embracement of
legend) and its singular focus on its martyrological tradition has also
been systematically exploited to buttress Zionist reasoning for the
necessity of the modern state of Israel: a home for Jews from worldwide
anti-Semitic persecution. The lengths some Jews will go to enforce --
and create -- the martyrological/persecution tradition for political
purposes was noted by Wilbur Crane Eveland, a former CIA agent stationed
in Iraq in the early years after the foundation (1948) of today's
Israel. A few months before his arrival to that country in 1950, a bomb
went off "outside a Passover gathering," underscoring Arab hostility to
Jews and encouraging 10,000 to move to the new Israeli state. Eveland
wrote that

"Just after I arrived in Baghdad, an Israeli citizen had been recognized
in the city's largest department store: his interrogation led to the
discovery of fifteen arms caches brought into Iraq by an underground
Zionist movement. In attempts to portray the Iraqis as anti-American
and to terrorize the Jews, the Zionists planted bombs in the United
States Information Service Library and in synagogues. Soon
leaflets began to appear urging Jews to flee to Israel ... Although
the Iraqi police later provided our embassy with evidence to show that
the synagogue and library bombings, as well as the anti-Jewish and anti-
American leaflet campaigns, had been the work of an underground
Zionist organization, most of the world believed reports that Arab
terrorism had motivated the flight of the Iraqi Jews whom the
Zionists had 'rescued' really just in order to increase Israel's Jewish
population." [FEURLICHT, p. 231]

Aware from personal experience about the facts in such matters, in 1998,
an Iraqi-born Jew and former Zionist activist, Naeim Giladi, wrote that
he wanted "to tell the American people, and especially American Jews,
that Jews from Islamic lands did not emigrate willingly to Israel; that
to force them to leave, Jews killed Jews." [GILADI, p. 1]

In 1975 Jewish CBS reporter Mike Wallace journeyed to another Arab
nation, Syria, to do a 60 Minutes program on the country. Years later,
he noted his own biases (about alleged Syrian anti-Semitism) that were
destroyed when he actually went to Damascus:

"[Before I went to Syria] I had a strong impression of what life was
like for [Jews] there. From Jewish friends in America, I had heard
the same stories over and over again: The Jews in Syria were confined
to ghettos and were constant victims of persecution. A tight curfew was
imposed on them and they were not allowed to have telephones or
drives automobiles. Nor were they permitted to worship in synagogues
of study in their traditional language, Hebrew. In short, the Syrian
Jews
were forced to live as prisoners within their own country." [WALLACE/
GATES, 1984, p. 282]

All this, as Wallace soon learned upon visiting Syria, was complete
nonsense. Jews owned cars; Jews had classes in Hebrew. Although the
Jewish community was under close surveillance by the Assad regime,
Wallace is careful to note that so was everyone in that police state.
The CBS reporter interviewed a variety of Jews in the Arab country.
Speaking to a Jewish teacher, Wallace notes his surprise to her response
about the myths he had heard about Syrian anti-Semitism :

"Then I mentioned all the stories I had heard about how badly the
Jews were treated in Syria, and when I asked her where she thought
they came from, she replied in an almost malevolent tone: 'I think
that it's Zionist propaganda.'" [WALLACE, M., 1984, pl. 285]

Cecil Roth, in his overviews of Jewish history with its attendant
polemics and apologetics (let alone some of the fraudulent escapades of
modern Zionism), argued that the continued suppression of an honest
evaluation of the Jewish past could come back to haunt them:

"By suppression we play into the hand of the anti-Semite, who may one
day make capital out of the innocent humanity we have chosen to
ignore. But, above all, by repression we are faithless to the most
sacred
charge of history, which is the pursuit of truth." [ROTH, p. 423]

Posted by The_West on 9/13/2007

According to the World Almanach there were 400,000 Jews in germany in 1939.
However thousands of them left for the greener pastures, and it is doubtful
if there were more than 300,000 by the time Hitler started
hounding them.

LINKS THAT WERE BROKEN BY THE HOLOCAUST COSPIRACY OF LIES.
2 SNOWY HAIRED 7 AND 8 YEAR OLD KIDS , A GIRL AND A BOY PLAYING IN THE
CONFUSION THAT WAS EUROPE DURING WWII CAME ACROSS A LARGE BLACK MAN SITTING
VERY QUIETLY AND STARTED TO SPEAK TO HIM AND PLAYFULLY TOUCH HIM.
HE CAME TO LIFE AND CHASED THEM OFF STILL NOT MOVING JUST BY YELLING AND
WAVING HIS ARMS. THE KIDS MOVED TO WHAT THEY THOUGHT WAS A SAFE DISTANCE
STILL TEASING HIM AS PLAYFUL STUPID 7 AND 8 YEAROLDS WILL.
THEN THE MAN HAVING APPARENTLY FRIGHTENED THEM OF TO A SAFE DISTANCE BLEW UP
INTO THE AIR SO FRIGHTENING THE 2 KIDS THEY RAN OF IN A PANIC TO TELL THEIR
MOTHER WHO WAS RESTING WITH OTHER REFUGEES .

THAT WAS THE LAST OF THE INCIDENT FOR THE KIDS ANYWAY TILL I WAS TALKING TO
THE RELATIVES NOW GROWN UP ADULTS AND REALISED WHAT HAD POSSIBLY HAPPENED.

WITH AN EXSERVICEMAN FATHER THERE WAS ONE LANDMINE IN WWII THAT I BELIEVE
YOU KNEW YOU HAD TRIGGERED WHEN YOU HEARD THE CLICK. THE NEXT SOUND YOU KNEW
YOU WOULD HEAR WOULD BE THE EXPLOSION WHICH WOULD IN ALL PROBABILITY KILL
YOU.

THAT IS ONE OF A THOUSAND STORIES THAT SHOULD HAVE CEMENTED RELATIONS
BETWEEN AMERICANS AND EUROPEANS IN THAT A LOT OF THE AMERICAN SERVICEMEN
TOOK HOME WIVES FROM EUROPE CEMENTED ON DANGEROUS MEETINGS LIKE THAT
DESCRIBED ABOVE THAT MIGHT HAVE SAVED THE SERVICEMANS LIFE.

HOWEVER THE FIRST TING THE EUROPEAN FOUND ON ARRIVING IN ANY OF THE WESTERN
DEMOCRACIES WAS THAT THE WATER HAD BEEN NICELY MUDDIED SO THAT WHEN YOU
INNOCENTLY CAME OUT WITH THE TRUTH AS YOU KNEW IT IN EUROPE HAVING LIVED
THROUGH IT, YOU WERE TOLD THAT YOU DID NOT KNOW WHAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT
AND HAD BEEN BRAINWASHED BY THE NAZIS BECAUSE THE JEWISH GROCERS AUNTY TOLD
HER ALL ABOUT WHAT REALLY HAPPENED .

AND YOU WERE IN SOMEONES ELSES COUNTRY INTERMARRIED AND ALL .
YOU HAD THE SAME FREEDOMS THAT YOU NOW ENJOY IN OUR WESTERN DEMOCRACIES, AND
SOME OF YOU TURNED ON THE PEOPLE AND COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE TO SHOW YOUR
SOLIDARITY WITH JEWS/ZIONISTS.

THERE WERE JEWS WHO WERE LOYAL GERMAN CITIZENS AND WORKED WITH THE GERMANS .

Jews in German army
http://www.kansaspress.ku.edu/righit.html

http://judaism.about.com/b/a/039042.htm
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/675641/posts
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/jewishnazi.html
http://www.kansaspress.ku.edu/righitpix.html
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GERmiltch.htm
http://www.jugendgeschichtswerkstatt.de/strassennamen/fliegerviertel/flieger
viertel.html
http://www.stormfront.org/whitehistory/gerjews.htm
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/00/03/NSJews.html
Here by a Munich-born historian saluting in moving detail a group of little
known
heroines - the women, nearly all of them German, who opposed Hitler both
before and, more dramatically, during the war.

http://www.new-books-in-german.com/aut2001/book05a.htm
http://www.kansaspress.ku.edu/righit.html

http://www.msnbc.com/news/606092.asp?0si=-&cp1=1
Who has said, America and Israel? I'll pick Israel every time. That is a guy
who was educated, worked in intelligence in the air force in America


http://www.von-waldenburg.com/reviews.html
WOMAN WHO LIVED THROUGH WAR IN GERMANY

HORRORS LET LOOSE BY WAR
http://www.technologyartist.com/unit_731/comments_731.html


http://www.tribalmessenger.org/
PEACE GROUP

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties
wwii CASUALTIES

TIME ACADEMICS STOPPED JEWS AND SUPPORTERS ENJOYING A GOOD LIVING ON
LIES AND DISHONEST PRACTICES IN CORRUPTING OUR HISTORY WHILE SUPPORTING THE
JAILING OF HONEST ACADEMICS TRYING TO PRESENT AND INCORPORATE THE TRUTH IN
WHAT IS MAINLY OUR HISTORY OF WWII AND NOT THE SOLE PROPERTY OF THE
JEWQW/ZIONIST/ISRAELI CLIQUE TO USE TO SUPPORT FURTHER LIES AND
MISREPRESENTATIONS ABOUT THE PRACTICES OF THE ZIONISTS AND SAME GROUP WHO
ARE IN POWER IN ISRAEL.

"Yisroel Markov" <ey.markov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:c58u72tfjrt2dafgrbko9qs33rutp5jh5h@xxxxxxxxxx
UK to Israeli Profs: Class Dismissed
------------------------------------
The weird movement to boycott Israeli academics
By Ari Paul

NOTHING WEIRD , THE WEIRD IS THE STANDING BACK AND ACTUALLY ALLOWING THE
PAMPERED AND EGOTISTICAL JEWISH/ZIONIST/ISRAELI ACADEMICS BLUFF THEM INTO
NOT CONTRADICTING ALL THE LIES THEY HAVE ACTUALLY MADE A PART OF WWII
HISTORY AND ALLOWED AND SUPPORTED THE JAILING OF JEWISH AND NONJEWISH
HISTORIANS DOING NO MORE THAN THEIR JOB BY MAKING AN HONEST EVALUATION OF
THE HOLOCAUST CLAIMS AS NOT SUPPORTED BY HISTORICAL FACT.

AND IN SO DOING SUPPORTING THE LIES AND PROPAGANDA SPREAD BY ISRAEL AND
SUPPORTERS WHO ARE NOT EITHER LOYAL CITIZENS OR HONEST MEN/WOMEN.

ALLOWING THESE FRAUDS TO ENJOY A GOOD LIVING WHILE ALLOWING HONEST ACADEMICS
TO BE PERSECUTED.


http://www.aldeilis.net/zion/zionhol01.html
The first point to note regarding the appropriation of the history of the
Holocaust by Zionist propaganda is that Zionism without anti-Semitism is
impossible. Zionism agrees with the basic tenet of anti-Semitism, namely
that Jews cannot live with non-Jews.

THE SECOND POINT IS IF THE ZEALOTS ARE SO UNABLE TO ACCEPT CO HABITATION
WITH NONJEWS, THEN THE JEWS /ZIONISTS SHOULD BE OBLIGED TO TAKE THE SAME
ACTION IN SILENCING THEIR AS NON JEWS DO AND ARE CONTINUALLY ASKED TO CHECK
ON THE STRENGHT OF A BIASED INACCURATE PORTRAYAL OF HISTORY TO ELICIT
SYMPATHY AND SUPPORT.

AND WE ALLOW ACADEMICS WITH THE MOST BARBARIC OF ISRAEL/ZIONIST/JEWISH
PHILOSOPHIES HOLD IMPORTANT POSITIONS IN OUR INSTITUTIONS PASSING ON THIS
OPINION OF HATE AND SUPPRESSION.

The Israel Lobby John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/mear01_.html


http://www.nowar-paix.ca/nowar/forum/6973
HOW TO KEEP ACADEMICS QUIET
The Real Issue Is Israel's Human Rights Record:
A statement by Norman G. Finkelstein upon publication of Beyond Chutzpah

Professor Alan Dershowitz of Harvard University is currently best known for
his advocacy of the "most excruciating" torture against terrorist suspects
such as a "needle being shoved under the fingernails." The alleged purpose
of this torture is to extract a truthful confession but its real
consequence, as human rights organizations have pointed out, is to produce
whatever statements are necessary to end the suffering. For 15 months


Israeli stats
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/


Jews and Palestinians genetically similar.
http://www.khazaria.com/genetics/abstracts.html

War without end
http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=39590


Yes and you have no quarrel with the US?
They dont have to, they use their army to shoot, run over and mistreat
physically and sexually helpless children. What can a Palestinian do when
the mighty money contributing yanks cannot protect their citizens.

http://www.thenausea.com/elements/thenotforgotten/rachel/index.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/79400p-72974c.html
One guy gets 10 years, the other gets a raise and promotion??


Marlon Brando.
http://www.theunjustmedia.com/ben%20stein%20on%20jewish%20media%20control.ht
m
So What.

Rabbi to Publish Book on Jewish Supremacy
.... One is Rabbi Saadya Grama, author of an upcoming book "On the Exalted
Nature of Israel and Understanding ... Written by Rabbi Saadya Grama !X an
alumnus of Beth Medrash Govoha, the ...
more hits from:
ttp://atheism.about.com/b/a/057831.htm?terms=published+book - 25 KB

The Jews declared war against Germany
On March 24, 1933, the Jewish World Congress, then under the leadership of
Chaim Weizman, declared war on Germany on behalf of the Jews of the world.
http://www.corax.org/revisionism/misc/encampment.html
http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecw
ar.html
http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/ds9.htm


http://www.rense.com/general45/zzo.htm
The Zionist Jewish Role In - Causing World War II
"In 1941, a Jewish writer, Theodor N. Kaufman, wrote Germany Must Perish.
Kaufman set out a plan for the total destruction of the German population by
a very simple method: the mass sterilisation of all German men and women
between the age of puberty and sixty years."

From a pre-1993 edition of John Tyndall's Spearhead magazine
12-9-3

http://www.corax.org/revisionism/misc/encampment.html
Immediately after Japan declared war on the United States of America, the
order was issued to round up all Americans of Japanese ancestry and imprison
them in large camps. A declaration of war entitles any nation to imprison
its enemy and their sympathizers.
On March 24, 1933, the Jewish World Congress, then under the leadership of
Chaim Weizman, declared war on Germany on behalf of the Jews of the world.
The basic question arises; what were the Germans supposed to do with their
large Jewish population?
O The Jewish Agency delegation headed by Golda Meir (Meirson) ignored a
German
offer to allow Jews to emigrate to other countries for $250 a head, and the
other Jewish groups made no effort to influence the United States and the
32 other countries attending the conference to allow immigration of German
and Austrian Jews.
http://www.jews-for-allah.org/Jews-not-for-Judaism/Jews-who-helped-nazis-hit
ler.htm






http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Dissenters1/Zundel1/transport.htm
!P England's Lord Shawcross, her most famous legal mind, stated in 1984.
!¢D!|I
have come to the realization that Hitler did not want war. It was us who
declared war .!|!|, etc. ad nauseum. His admission of historical truth was
subsequently swept under the rug, never to be repeated in public print
again.


http://americandefenseleague.com/whyhitlr.htm Why Hitler Came to Power:
One Rabbi!|s Explanation - By Rabbi Dr. Manfred Reifer - We played with
the
most holy possessions of the people and at times made fun of all that was
sacred to the nation.
http://www.heretical.com/mkilliam/wwii.html
That second war was later made certain, not by the intentions of Hitler but
by the determination of his eternal enemies to destroy the new Germany that
he had created.

http://www.geocities.com/truth4ever123/41.htm
In the magazine Kefonium ;Jerusalem no 14 Feb 1982 page 49-59
Iraq that country which is rich with its petrol resources and have a lot of
internal struggles is
located in the frontline with Israel and its decomposition is critical for
Israel may more than
defeating Syria as Iraq resembles on short range the biggest threat for
Israel in the area .

No Documentary Evidence

Many thousands of secret German documents dealing with Auschwitz were
confiscated after the war by the Allies. Not a single one refers to a
policy or program of extermination. In fact, the extermination story cannot
be reconciled with the documentary evidence.
Many Jewish Inmates Unable to Work

It is often claimed that all Jews at Auschwitz who were unable to work were
immediately killed. Jews who were too old, young, sick, or weak were
supposedly gassed on arrival, and only those who could be worked to death
were temporarily kept alive.

But the evidence shows that, in fact, a very high percentage of the Jewish
inmates were not able to work, and were nevertheless not killed. For
example, an internal German telex message dated Sept. 4, 1943, from the
chief of the Labor Allocation department of the SS Economic and
Administrative Main Office (WVHA), reported that of 25,000 Jewish inmates
in Auschwitz, only 3,581 were able to work, and that all of the remaining
Jewish inmates -- some 21,500, or about 86 percent -- were unable to work.
[9]


The Liberation of the Camps
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=55


A Factual Appriasal by the Red Cross
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=2735

Read the Red Cross reports. Go to the Red Cross museum, headquarters
in your city and pick up the records. Anyway theres a few independent
witnesses.
http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndstats.html


http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_international&Numbe
r=293321480
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/print.asp?ID=2735

http://www.rense.com/general69/factua.htm

Rassinier seems to wrap it up.
http://www.ihr.org/books/rassinier/debunking1-0.html
During World WarII, Rassinier was a highly decorated member of the French
Resistance. In October of 1943 he was arrested by the Gestapo for various
activities including the smuggling of Jewish refugees over the Franco-Swiss
border. http://www.codoh.com/thoughtcrimes/PORT1RAS.HTML

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n2_Letters.html
On July 13, 1994, a documentary on the life of Charles A. Lindbergh
broadcast on the Public Broadcast System (PBS - KENW-TV) said that when
Lindbergh visited one of these few camps in Germany following WW2, he was
told that 25,000 died in 1-1/2 years
http://history.acusd.edu/gen/WW2Timeline/lindbergh3.html






TERROR BOMBING
Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain had given an assurance that:
'The British Government would never resort to the deliberate attack on women
and children and other civilians for the purpose of mere terrorism.'
However, his successor Winston Churchill appointed as his personal adviser
the Jew Professor Lindemann. Lindemann, later Lord Cherwell, suggested the
bombing of German cities and that working class areas were legitimate
targets, and from then onwards the last vestiges of civilised decency in
warfare were abandoned. These bombings began on 10 August 1940 with the
bombing of the small open town of Freiburg on the Swiss frontier.
Fifty-three civilians were killed, including twenty children playing in the
park. It was reported by Mr. Taylor of the American Red Cross in the New
York Times of 3 May 1940. This was before the Germans began bombing British
cities. Mr. J. M. Speight, CBE, Principal Secretary to the Air Ministry,
wrote in his book The Splendid Decision:
'Adolf Hitler only undertook the bombing of British civilian targets
reluctantly after the RAF had commenced bombing German civilian targets...
It gave Coventry, Birmingham, Sheffield and Southampton the right to look
Kiev, Kharkov, Stalingrad and Sebastopol in the face. Our Soviet allies
would have been less critical of our inactivity if they had understood what
we had done... Hitler would have been willing at my time to stop the
slaughter. Hitler was genuinely anxious to reach with Britain an agreement
confining the action of aircraft to battle zones.'
http://www.heretical.com/

http://www.msnbc.com/news/606092.asp?0si=-&cp1=1
Who has said, America and Israel? I'll pick Israel every time. That is a guy
who was educated, worked in intelligence in the air force in America
ALIEN CONTROL
Is US like Germany of the '30s? Published on Friday, June 11, 2004 by the
Chicago Sun Times by Andrew Greeley
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0611-10.htm

The Daily Mail reported on 10 July 1933:
'The German nation, moreover, was rapidly falling under the control of its
alien elements. In the last days of the pre-Hitler regime there were twenty
times as many Jewish government officials in Germany as had existed before
the war. Israelites of international attachments were insinuating themselves
into key positions in the German administrative machine.'


http://www.aldeilis.net/zion/zionhol01.html

The Zionist Federation of Germany (ZVfD), an organisation representing a
tiny minority of German Jews, was selected by the Nazis as the body to
represent the Jews of the Reich.
The best example of this was the 'Transfer Agreement' of 1934. Immediately
after the Nazi takeover in 1933, Jews all over the world supported or were
organising a world wide boycott of German goods. This campaign hurt the Nazi
regime and the German authorities searched frantically for a way disabling
the boycott. It was clear that if Jews and Jewish organisations were to pull
out, the campaign would collapse.
This problem was solved by the ZVfD. A letter sent to the Nazi party as
early as 21.6.33, outlined the degree of agreement that existed between the
two organisations on the questions of race, nation, and the nature of the
'Jewish problem', and it offered to collaborate with the new regime:

In their eagerness to gain credence and the backing of the new regime, the
Zionist organisation managed to undermine the boycott. The main public act
was the signature of the 'Transfer Agreement' with the Nazi authorities
during the Zionist Congress of 1934. In essence, the agreement was designed
to get Germany's Jews out of the country and into Mandate Palestine. It
provided a possibility for Jews to take a sizeable part of their property
out of the country, through a transfer of German goods to Palestine. This
right was denied to Jews leaving for any other destination (emphasis - ED).
The Zionist Organisation was the acting agent, through its financial
organisations. This agreement operated on a number of fronts 'helping' Jews
to leave the country, breaking the ring of the boycott, exporting German
goods in large quantities to Palestine, and last but not least, enabling the
regime to be seen as humane and reasonable even towards its avowed enemies,
the Jews. After all, they argued, the Jews do not belong in Europe and now
the Jews come and agree with them.

After news of the agreement broke, the boycott was doomed. If the Zionist
Organisation found it possible and necessary to deal with the Nazis, and
import their goods, who could argue for a boycott? This was not the first
time that the interests of both movements were presented to the German
public as complementary. Baron Von Mildenstein, the first head of the Jewish
Department of the SS, later followed by Eichmann, was invited to travel to
Palestine. This he did in early 1933, in the company of a Zionist leader,
Kurt Tuchler. Having spent six months in Palestine, he wrote a series of
favourable articles in Der Sturmer describing the 'new Jew' of Zionism, a
Jew Nazis could accept and understand.








The declared enemy was now right in the middle of their country. Bankers,
industrialists, media moguls, movie producers, merchants, and others,
overnight became enemies of Germany.
No nation in the world would have allowed their declared enemies to freely
roam around the country. The Germans, however, never implemented measures
against the Jews as drastic as the United States did with their Japanese
citizens.

http://www.corax.org/revisionism/misc/encampment.html
On March 24, 1933, the Jewish World Congress, then under the leadership of
Chaim Weizman, declared war on Germany on behalf of the Jews of the world.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/books/20040228-104600-5293r.htm
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0618485406/102-0292101-9147327?v=glance&n=2
83155
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/samples/hm051/2003047896.html
Russian troops marched into Berlin on April 24, 1945, they found 800 Jews
alive and well in Berlin's Jewish hospital.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/april/21/newsid_3560000/356
0175.stm




.

Loading