Re: More on Einstein
- From: "Ben Cramer" <[remove]bencramer7@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:14:19 +1000
"Tilly" <TillyGr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:GQD0g.13506$JZ1.551926@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ben Cramer wrote:
Albert Einstein: A Jewish Myth
by Dr. Paul Bowers, B.S., M.E., Ch.D.
One of the statements of Adolf Hitler most often quoted by the Jewish
media is the following from Mein Kampf, I:10:
"The great masses of people ... will more easily fall victims to a
big lie than to a small one."
Of course, Hitler is quoted out of context in an attempt to portray
this statement as Hitler's own, personal philosophy or strategy. But
if we read this selection in context, we find that he is speaking of
the Jews who had ruined his country, and he is trying to explain how
the German people fell victim to Jewish lies. In fact, Herr Hitler
even tells us what this great lie is that duped the German people
into being controlled by the Jews. He continues:
"Those who know best this truth about the possibilities of the
application of untruth and defamation, however, were at all times the
Jews; for their entire existence is built on one single great lie,
namely, that here one had to deal with a religious brotherhood, while
in fact one has to deal with a race - what a race! As such they have
been nailed down forever, in an eternally correct sentence of
fundamental truth, by one of the greatest minds of mankind; he called
them 'the great masters of lying.' He who does not realize this or
does not want to believe this will never be able to help truth to
victory in this world."
Hitler here was referring to Arthur Schopenhauer, the eminent 19th
century German philosopher who was outspoken regarding the true
nature of Jews. We do not need to rely upon the opinions of German
philosophers and political leaders regarding this character trait of
the Jews, for Jesus Christ has said of the Jews,
"You are of your father the Diabolical One, and the lusts of your
father you wish to do. That one was a murderer from the beginning,
and he has not stood in the truth because there is no truth in him.
When he speaks a lie, he speaks of his own, because he is a liar, and
the father of it" (John 8:44 AST).
Furthermore, the New Testament warns us not to listen to "Judaizing
myths" (Titus 1:14). But Jewish myths are exactly what destroyed
Germany and what have destroyed America today. Herr Hitler may have
been correct in what he felt was the greatest Jewish lie, but there
are many, many more which have had a damning effect on the white
race. One of the greatest is certainly the lie of the Hebrew
Masoretic Text and the removal of the Greek Septuagint from the hands
of white Christians, but each Jewish myth stings with the same
poisonous venom. One of the great Jewish myths of the 20th century is
Albert Einstein.
Albert Einstein is held up by the Jewish liars as a rare genius who
drastically changed the field of theoretical physics. As such, he is
made an idol to young people and his very name has become synonymous
with genius. The truth, however, is very different. The reality is
that Einstein was an inept, moronic Jew who could not even tie his
own shoelaces; he contributed nothing original to the field of
quantum mechanics or any other science, but on the contrary he stole
the ideas of other men and the Jewish media made him a hero.
When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we find that
his only brilliance lies in his ability to plagiarize and steal other
people's ideas, passing them off as his own.
Einstein's education, or lack thereof, is an important part of this
story. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of Einstein's early education
that he "showed little scholastic ability." It also says that at the
age of 15, "with poor grades in history, geography, and languages, he
left school with no diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a school
paper of his "lack of imagination and practical ability." In 1895,
Einstein failed a simple entrance exam to an engineering school in
Zurich. This exam consisted mainly of mathematical problems, and
Einstein showed himself to be mathematically inept in this exam. He
then entered a lesser school hoping to use it as a stepping stone to
the engineering school he could not get into, but after graduating in
1900, he still could not get a position at the engineering school!
Unable to go to the school as he had wanted, he got a job (with the
help of a friend) at the patent office in Bern. He was to be a
technical expert third class, which meant that he was too incompetent
for a higher qualified position. Even after publishing his so-called
groundbreaking papers of 1905 and after working in the patent office
for six years, he was only elevated to a second class standing.
Remember, the work he was doing at the patent office, for which he
was only rated third class, was not quantum mechanics or theoretical
physics, but was reviewing technical documents for patents of every
day things; yet he was barely qualified.
He would work at the patent office until 1909, all the while
continuously trying to get a position at a university, but without
success. All of these facts are true, but now begins the Jewish myth.
Supposedly, while working a full time job, without the aid of
university colleagues, a staff of graduate students, a laboratory, or
any of the things normally associated with an academic setting,
Einstein in his spare time wrote four ground-breaking essays in the
field of theoretical physics and quantum mechanics that were
published in 1905. Many people have recognized the impossibility of
such a feat, including Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein has
led people to believe that many of these ideas came to him in his
sleep, out of the blue, because indeed that is the only logical
explanation of how an admittedly inept moron could have written such
documents at the age of 26 without any real education. However, a
simpler explanation exists: he stole the ideas and plagiarized the
papers.
Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the
source of each. It should be remembered that these ideas are
presented by Einstein's worshippers as totally new and completely
different, each of which would change the landscape of science. These
four papers dealt with the following four ideas, respectively:
1. The foundation of the photon theory of light;
2. The equivalence of energy and mass;
3. The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;
4. The special theory of relativity.
Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory of
relativity. This is perhaps the most famous idea falsely attributed
to Einstein. Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt with what Einstein
called the Special Theory of Relativity (the General Theory would
come in 1915). This theory contradicted the traditional Newtonian
mechanics and was based upon two premises: 1) in the absence of
acceleration, the laws of nature are the same for all observers; and
2) since the speed of light is independent of the motion of its
source, then the time interval between two events is longer for an
observer in whose frame of reference the events occur at different
places than for an observer in whose frame of reference the events
occur in the same place. This is basically the idea that time passes
more slowly as one's velocity approaches the speed of light, relative
to slower velocities where time would pass faster.
This theory has been validated by modern experiments and is the basis
for modern physics. But these two premises are far from being
originally Einstein's. First of all, the idea that the speed of light
was a constant and was independent of the motion of its source was
not Einstein's at all, but was proposed by the Scottish scientist
James Maxwell. Maxwell studied the phenomenon of light extensively
and first proposed that it was electromagnetic in nature. He wrote an
article to this effect for the 1878 edition of the Encyclopedia
Britannica. His ideas prompted much debate, and by 1887, as a result
of his work and the ensuing debate, the scientific community,
particularly Lorentz, Michelson, and Morley reached the conclusion
that the velocity of light was independent of the velocity of the
observer. Thus, this piece of the Special Theory of Relativity was
known 27 years before Einstein wrote his paper.
This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and Morley to
conduct an important experiment, the results of which could not be
explained by Newtonian mechanics. They observed a phenomenon caused
by relativity but they did not understand relativity. They had
attempted to detect the motion of the earth through ether, which was
a medium thought to be necessary for the propagation of light.
In response to this problem, in 1889, the Irish physicist George
FitzGerald, who had also first proposed a mechanism for producing
radio waves, wrote a paper which stated that the results of the
Michelson-Morley experiment could be explained if,
"... the length of material bodies changes, according as they are
moving through the ether or across it, by an amount depending on the
square of the ratio of their velocities to that of light."
This is the theory of relativity, 13 years before Einstein's paper!
Furthermore, in 1892, Hendrik Lorentz, from The Netherlands, proposed
the same solution and began to greatly expand the idea. All
throughout the 1890's, both Lorentz and FitzGerald worked on these
ideas and wrote articles strangely similar to Einstein's Special
Theory detailing what is now known as the Lorentz-FitzGerald
Contraction. In 1898, the Irishman Joseph Larmor wrote down equations
explaining the Lorentz-FitzGerald contraction and its relativistic
consequences, 7 years before Einstein's paper. By 1904, Lorentz
transformations, the series of equations explaining relativity, were
published by Lorentz. They describe the increase of mass, the
shortening of length, and the time dilation of a body moving at
speeds close to the velocity of light. In short, by 1904, everything
in Einstein's paper regarding the Special Theory of Relativity had
already been published.
The Frenchman Poincaré had, in 1898, written a paper unifying many of
these ideas. He stated seven years before Einstein's paper that,
"... we have no direct intuition about the equality of two time
intervals. The simultaneity of two events or the order of their
succession, as well as the equality of two time intervals, must be
defined in such a way that the statements of the natural laws be as
simple as possible."
Anyone who has read Einstein's 1905 paper will immediately recognize
the similarity and the lack of originality on the part of Einstein.
Thus we see that the only thing original about the paper was the term
'Special Theory of Relativity.' Everything else was plagiarized. Over
the next few years, Poincaré became one of the most important
lecturers and writers regarding relativity, but he never, in any of
his papers or speeches, mentioned Albert Einstein. Thus, while
Poincaré was busy bringing the rest of the academic world up to speed
regarding relativity, Einstein was still working in the patent office
in Bern and no one in the academic community thought it necessary to
give much credence or mention to Einstein's work. Most of these early
physicists knew that he was a fraud.
This brings us to the explanation of Brownian motion, the subject of
another of Einstein's 1905 papers. Brownian motion describes the
irregular motion of a body arising from the thermal energy of the
molecules of the material in which the body is immersed. The movement
had first been observed by the Scottish botanist Robert Brown in
1827. The explanation of this phenomenon has to do with the Kinetic
Theory of Matter, and it was the American Josiah Gibbs and the
Austrian Ludwig Boltzmann who first explained this occurrence, not
Albert Einstein. In fact, the mathematical equation describing the
motion contains the famous Boltzmann constant, k. Between these two
men, they had explained by the 1890s everything in Einstein's 1905
paper regarding Brownian motion.
The subject of the equivalence of mass and energy was contained in a
third paper published by Einstein in 1905. This concept is expressed
by the famous equation E=mc^2. Einstein's biographers categorize this
as "his most famous and most spectacular conclusion." Even though
this idea is an obvious conclusion of Einstein's earlier relativity
paper, it was not included in that paper but was published as an
afterthought later in the year. Still, the idea of energy-mass
equivalence was not original with Einstein.
That there was an equivalence between mass and energy had been shown
in the laboratory in the 1890s by both J.J. Thomsom of Cambridge and
by W. Kaufmann in Göttingen. In 1900, Poincaré had shown that there
was a mass relationship for all forms of energy, not just
electromagnetic energy. Yet, the most probable source of Einstein's
plagiarism was Friedrich Hasenöhrl, one of the most brilliant, yet
unappreciated physicists of the era. Hasenöhrl was the teacher of
many of the German scientists who would later become famous for a
variety of topics. He had worked on the idea of the equivalence of
mass and energy for many years and had published a paper on the topic
in 1904 in the very same journal which Einstein would publish his
plagiarized version in 1905. For his brilliant work in this area,
Hasenörhl had received in 1904 a prize from the prestigious Vienna
Academy of Sciences.
Furthermore, the mathematical relationship of mass and energy was a
simple deduction from the already well-known equations of Scottish
physicist James Maxwell. Scientists long understood that the
mathematical relationship expressed by the equation E=mc^2 was the
logical result of Maxwell's work, they just did not believe it. Thus,
the experiments of Thomson, Kaufmann, and finally, and most
importantly, Hasenörhl, confirmed Maxwell's work. It is ludicrous to
believe that Einstein developed this postulate, particularly in light
of the fact that Einstein did not have the laboratory necessary to
conduct the appropriate experiments.
In this same plagiarized article of Einstein's, he suggested to the
scientific community, "Perhaps it will prove possible to test this
theory using bodies whose energy content is variable to a high degree
(e.g., salts of radium)." This remark demonstrates how little
Einstein understood about science, for this was truly an outlandish
remark. By saying this, Einstein showed that he really did not
understand basic scientific principles and that he was writing about
a topic that he did not understand. In fact, in response to this
article, J. Precht remarked that such an experiment "lies beyond the
realm of possible experience."
The last subject dealt with in Einstein's 1905 papers was the
foundation of the photon theory of light. Einstein wrote about the
photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect is the release of
electrons from certain metals or semiconductors by the action of
light. This area of research is particularly important to the
Einstein myth because it was for this topic that he unjustly received
his 1922 Nobel Prize.
But again, it is not Einstein, but Wilhelm Wien and Max Planck who
deserve the credit. The main point of Einstein's paper, and the point
for which he is given credit, is that light is emitted and absorbed
in finite packets called quanta. This was the explanation for the
photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect had been explained by
Heinrich Hertz in 1888. Hertz and others, including Philipp Lenard,
worked on understanding this phenomenon. Lenard was the first to show
that the energy of the electrons released in the photoelectric effect
was not governed by the intensity of the light but by the frequency
of the light. This was an important breakthrough.
Wien and Planck were colleagues and they were the fathers of modern
day quantum theory. By 1900, Max Planck, based upon his and Wien's
work, had shown that radiated energy was absorbed and emitted in
finite units called quanta. The only difference in his work of 1900
and Einstein's work of 1905 was that Einstein limited himself to
talking about one particular type of energy - light energy. But the
principles and equations governing the process in general had been
deduced by Planck in 1900. Einstein himself admitted that the obvious
conclusion of Planck's work was that light also existed in discrete
packets of energy. Thus, nothing in this paper of Einstein's was
original.
After the 1905 papers of Einstein were published, the scientific
community took little notice and Einstein continued his job at the
patent office until 1909 when it was arranged for him to take a
position at a school by World Jewry. Still, it was not until a 1919
newspaper headline that he gained any notoriety.
With Einstein's academic appointment in 1909, he was placed in a
position where he could begin to use other people's work as his own
more openly. He engaged many of his students to look for ways to
prove the theories he had supposedly developed, or ways to apply
those theories, and then he could present the research as his own or
at least take partial credit. In this vein, in 1912, he began to try
and express his gravitational research in terms of a new, recently
developed calculus, which was conducive to understanding relativity.
This was the beginning of his General Theory of Relativity, which he
would publish in 1915. But the mathematical work was not done by
Einstein - he was incapable of it. Instead, it was performed by the
mathematician Marcel Grossmann, who in turn used the mathematical
principles developed by Berhard Riemann, who was the first to develop
a sound non-Euclidean geometry, which is the basis of all mathematics
used to describe relativity.
The General Theory of Relativity applied the principles of relativity
to the universe; that is, to the gravitational pull of planets and
their orbits, and the general principle that light rays bend as they
pass by a massive object. Einstein published an initial paper in 1913
based upon the work which Grossmann did, adapting the math of Riemann
to Relativity. But this paper was filled with errors and the
conclusions were incorrect. It appears that Grossmann was not smart
enough to figure it out for Einstein. So Einstein was forced to look
elsewhere to plagiarize his General Theory. Einstein published his
correct General Theory of Relativity in 1915, and said prior to its
publication that he, "...completely succeeded in convincing Hilbert
and Klein." He is referring to David Hilbert, perhaps the most
brilliant mathematician of the 20th century, and Felix Klein, another
mathematician who had been instrumental in the development of the
area of calculus that Grossmann had used to develop the General
Theory of Relativity for Einstein.
Einstein's statement regarding the two men would lead the reader to
believe that Einstein had changed Hilbert's and Klein's opinions
regarding General Relativity, and that he had influenced them in
their thinking. However, the exact opposite is true. Einstein stole
the majority of his General Relativity work from these two men, the
rest being taken from Grossmann. Hilbert submitted for publication, a
week before Einstein completed his work, a paper which contained the
correct field equations of General Relativity. What this means is
that Hilbert wrote basically the exact same paper, with the same
conclusions, before Einstein did. Einstein would have had an
opportunity to know of Hilbert's work all along, because there were
Jewish friends of his working for Hilbert. Yet, even this was not
necessary, for Einstein had seen Hilbert's paper in advance of
publishing his own. Both of these papers were, before being printed,
delivered in the form of a lecture.
Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin and
Hilbert had presented his paper on November 20 in Göttingen. On
November 18, Hilbert received a letter from Einstein thanking him for
sending him a draft of the treatise Hilbert was to deliver on the
20th. So, in fact, Hilbert had sent a copy of his work at least two
weeks in advance to Einstein before either of the two men delivered
their lectures, but Einstein did not send Hilbert an advance copy of
his. Therefore, this serves as incontrovertible proof that Einstein
quickly plagiarized the work and then presented it, hoping to beat
Hilbert to the punch. Also, at the same time, Einstein publicly began
to belittle Hilbert, even though in the previous summer he had
praised him in an effort to get Hilbert to share his work with him.
Hilbert made the mistake of sending Einstein this draft copy, but
still he delivered his work first.
Not only did Hilbert publish his work first, but it was of much higher
quality than Einstein's. It is known today that there are many
problems with assumptions made in Einstein's General Theory paper. We
know today that Hilbert was much closer to the truth. Hilbert's paper
is the forerunner of the unified field theory of gravitation and
electromagnetism and of the work of Erwin Schrödinger, whose work is
the basis of all modern day quantum mechanics.
That the group of men discussed so far were the actual originators of
the ideas claimed by Einstein was known by the scientific community
all along. In 1940, a group of German physicists meeting in Austria
declared that "before Einstein, Aryan scientists like Lorentz,
Hasenöhrl, Poincaré, etc., had created the foundations of the theory
of relativity..."
However, the Jewish media did not promote the work of these men. The
Jewish media did not promote the work of David Hilbert, but instead
they promoted the work of the Jew Albert Einstein. As we mentioned
earlier, this General Theory, as postulated by Hilbert first and in
plagiarized form by Einstein second, stated that light rays should
bend when they pass by a massive object. In 1919, during the eclipse
of the Sun, light from distant stars passing close to the Sun was
observed to bend according to the theory. This evidence supported the
General Theory of Relativity, and the Jewish-controlled media
immediately seized upon the opportunity to prop up Einstein as a
hero, at the expense of the true genius, David Hilbert.
On November 7th, 1919, the London Times ran an article, the headline
of which proclaimed, "Revolution in science - New theory of the
Universe - Newtonian ideas overthrown." This was the beginning of the
force-feeding of the Einstein myth to the masses. In the following
years, Einstein's earlier 1905 papers were propagandized and Einstein
was heralded as the originator of all the ideas he had stolen.
Because of this push by the Jewish media, in 1922, Einstein received
the Nobel Prize for the work he had stolen in 1905 regarding the
photoelectric effect.
The establishment of the Einstein farce between 1919 and 1922 was an
important coup for world Zionism and Jewry. As soon as Einstein had
been established as an idol to the popular masses of England and
America, his image was promoted as the rare genius that he is
erroneously believed to be today. As such, he immediately began his
work as a tool for World Zionism. The masses bought into the idea
that if someone was so brilliant as to change our fundamental
understanding of the universe, then certainly we ought to listen to
his opinions regarding political and social issues. This is exactly
what World Jewry wanted to establish in its ongoing effort of social
engineering. They certainly did not want someone like David Hilbert
to be recognized as rare genius. After all, this physicist had come
from a strong German, Christian background. His grandfather's two
middle names were 'Fürchtegott Leberecht' or 'Fear God, Live Right.'
In August of 1934, the day before a vote was to be taken regarding
installing Adolf Hitler as President of the Reich, Hilbert signed a
proclamation in support of Adolf Hitler, along with other leading
German scientists, that was published in the German newspapers. So
the Jews certainly did not want David Hilbert receiving the credit he
deserved.
The Jews did not want Max Planck receiving the credit he deserved
either. This German's grandfather and great-grandfather had been
important German theologians, and during World War II he would stay
in Germany throughout the war, supporting his fatherland the best he
could.
The Jews certainly did not want the up-and-coming Erwin Schrödinger
to be heralded as a genius to the masses. This Austrian physicist
would go on to teach at Adolf Hitler University in Austria, and he
wrote a public letter expressing his support for the Third Reich.
This Austrian's work on the unified field theory was a forerunner of
modern physics, even though it had been criticized by Einstein, who
apparently could not understand it.
The Jews did not want to have Werner Heisenberg promoted as a rare
genius, even though he would go on to solidify quantum theory and
contribute to it greatly, as well as develop his famous uncertainty
principle, in addition to describing the modern atom and nucleus and
the binding energies that are essential to modern chemistry. No, the
Jews did not want Heisenberg promoted as a genius because he would go
on to head the German atomic bomb project and serve prison time after
the war for his involvement with the Third Reich.
No, the Jews did not want to give credit to any of a number of white
Germans, Austrians, Irishmen, Frenchmen, Scotsmen, Englishmen, and
even Americans who had contributed to the body of knowledge and
evidence from which Einstein plagiarized and stole his work. Instead,
they needed to erect Einstein as their golden calf, even though he
repeatedly and often embarrassed himself with his nonfactual or
nearsighted comments regarding the work he had supposedly done. For
example, in 1934, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ran a front page
article in which Einstein gave an "emphatic denial" regarding the
idea of practical applications for the "energy of the atom." The
article says,
"But the 'energy of the atom' is something else again. If you believe
that man will someday be able to harness this boundless energy-to
drive a great steamship across the ocean on a pint of water, for
instance-then, according to Einstein, you are wrong..."
Again, Einstein clearly did not understand the branch of physics he
had supposedly founded, though elsewhere in the world at the time
theoretical research was underway that would lead to the atomic bomb
and nuclear energy. But after Einstein was promoted as a god in 1919,
he made no real attempts to plagiarize any other work. Rather, he
began his real purpose - evangelizing for the cause of Zionism and
World Jewry. Though he did publish other articles after this time,
all of them were co-authored by at least one other person, and in
each instance, Einstein had little if anything to do with the
research that led to the articles; he was merely recruited by the
co-authors in order to lend credence to their work. Thus freed of the
pretense of academia, Einstein began his assault for World Zionism.
In 1921, Einstein made his first visit to the United States on a
fund-raising tour for the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and to
promote Zionism. In April of 1922, Einstein used his status to gain
membership in a Commission of the League of Nations. In February of
1923, Einstein visits Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. In June of 1923, he
becomes a founding member of the Association of Friends of the New
Russia. In 1926, Einstein took a break from his Communist and
Zionistic activities to again embarrass himself scientifically by
criticizing the work of Schrödinger and Heisenberg. Following a brief
illness, he resumes his Zionistic agenda, wanting an independent
Israel and at the same time a World Government.
In the 1930s he actively campaigns against all forms of war, although
he would reverse this position during World War II when he advocated
war against Germany and the creation of the atomic bomb, which he
thought was impossible to build. In 1939 and 1940, Einstein, at the
request of other Jews, wrote two letters to Roosevelt urging an
American program to develop an atomic bomb to be used on Germany -
not Japan. Einstein would have no part in the actual construction of
the bomb, theoretical or practical, because he lacked the skills for
either.
In December of 1946, Einstein rekindles his efforts for a World
Government, with Israel apparently being the only autonomous nation.
This push continues through the rest of the 1940s. In 1952, Einstein,
who had been instrumental in the creation of the State of Israel,
both politically and economically, is offered the presidency of
Israel. He declines. In 1953, he spends his time attacking the
McCarthy Committee, and he supports Communists such as J. Robert
Oppenheimer. He encourages civil disobedience in response to the
McCarthy trials. Finally, on April 18, 1955, this filthy Jewish
demagogue dies.
Dead, the Jews no longer had to worry about Einstein making stupid
statements. His death was just the beginning of his usage and
exploitation by World Jewry. The Jewish-controlled media continued to
promote the myth of this Super-Jew long after his death, and as more
and more of the men who knew better died off, the Jews were more and
more able to aggrandize his myth and lie more boldly. This brazen
lying has culminated in the Jew controlled Time magazine naming
Einstein "The Person of the Century" at the close of 1999. It may be
demonstrated that the Jewish lies have become more bold with the
passage of time because Einstein was never named "Man of the Year"
while he was alive, but now, over forty years after his death, he is
named "Person of the Century."
Einstein was given this title in spite of the clear-cut choice for the
"Person of the Century," Adolf Hitler. Hitler was indeed named "Man
of the Year" while he was still living by Time magazine, and
according to a December 27, 1999, article in the USA Today, Einstein
was chosen over Adolf Hitler because of the perceived "nasty public
relations fallout" that would accompany that choice; yet in internet
polling by Time, Hitler finished third and was the top serious
candidate. Still the issue of Time magazine dedicated to Einstein,
which has articles by men with names like Isaacson, Golden, Stein,
Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt, is interesting to read. For one, they
found it necessary to include an article rationalizing why they did
not pick the obvious choice, Adolf Hitler. But more interesting is
the article by Stephen Hawking which purports to be a history of the
theory of relativity. In it, Hawking admits many of the things in
this article, such as the fact that Hilbert published the General
Theory of Relativity before Einstein and that FitzGerald and Lorentz
deduced the concept of relativity long before Einstein. Hawking also
writes,
"Einstein...was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner Heisenberg in
Copenhagen, Paul Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin Schrödinger in Zurich,
who developed a new picture of reality called quantum mechanics. ...
Einstein was horrified by this ... Most scientists, however, accepted
the validity of the new quantum laws because they showed excellent
agreement with observations ... They are the basis of modern
developments in chemistry, molecular biology and electronics and the
foundation of the technology that has transformed the world in the
past half-century."
This is all very true, yet the same magazine credits Einstein with
all of the modern developments that Hawking names, even through
Einstein was so stupid as to be vehemently against the most important
idea of modern science, just as he opposed Schrödinger's work in
unified field theory which was far ahead of its time. The same
magazine admits that "success eluded" Einstein in the field of
explaining the contradictions between relativity and quantum
mechanics. Today, these contradictions are explained by the unified
field theory, but Einstein, who proves himself to be one of the least
intelligent of 20th century scientists, refused to believe in either
quantum theory or the unified field theory.
To name Einstein as "The Person of the Century" is one of the most
ludicrous and absurd lies of all time, yet it has been successfully
pulled off by Isaacson, Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt and
the Jewish owners of Time magazine. If the Jews at Time wanted to
give the title to an inventor or scientist, then the most obvious
choice would have been men like Hilbert, Planck, or Heisenberg. If
they wanted to give it to the scientist who most fundamentally
changed the landscape of 20th century science, then the obvious
choice would be William Shockley. This Nobel prize winning scientist
invented the transistor, which is the basis of all modern electronic
devices and computers, everything from modern cars and telephones,
VCRs and watches, to the amazing computers which have allowed
incomprehensible advances in all fields of science. Without the
transistor, all forms of science today would be basically in the same
place that they were in the late 1940s.
However, the Jews cannot allow the due credit to go to William
Shockley because he spent the majority of his scientific career
demonstrating the genetic and mental inferiority of non-whites and
arguing for their sterilization. His scientific, genetic views led
the Jews to financially destroy Shockley who founded the first
company in the Silicon Valley, his hometown, to develop computer
chips. The Jews hired away his entire staff and used them to start
Fairchild semiconductor, the company that today is known as Intel.
No the Jews could not let any of the truly great geniuses of our time
be recognized, not the anti-Semite Henry Ford, not the great German
scientists who helped the National Socialists in Germany, not Charles
Lindbergh, who was sympathetic to National Socialist causes, and
certainly not William Shockley, one of the most brilliant physicists
and geneticists of our time. Instead, the Jews propped up the
Zionist, Communist Albert Einstein who hated everything white.
After World War II, Einstein demonstrated his hatred of the White
Race and of the Germans in particular in the following statements. He
was asked what he thought about Germany and about re-educating the
Germans after the war and said,
"The nation has been on the decline mentally and morally since
1870...Behind the Nazi party stands the German people, who elected
Hitler after he had in his book and in his speeches made his shameful
intentions clear beyond the possibility of misunderstanding. ... The
Germans can be killed or constrained after the war, but they cannot
be re-educated to a democratic way of thinking and acting..."
Einstein here is advocating the murder of Germans, because he feels
that this is the only way that they can be kept in check. He is right
about one thing, the Germans did knowingly support the cause of
National Socialism, but what Einstein is attacking is Christianity,
because it was Christianity that led the German people to
overwhelmingly support National Socialism. It was the German
Christian Faith Movement and the Christian Social Party of men like
Karl Lueger that led the German people to their understanding of
Jews. The Jew Daniel Goldhagen has recently shown the Christian basis
of National Socialism in his book, Hitler's Willing Executioners:
Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust, and the book Why The Jews? by
Prager and Telushkin similarly proves the Christian origins of what
the Jews call 'anti-Semitism.' Einstein understood this and Einstein,
like all Jews, hated Christianity. So what Einstein was really
advocating was the killing and constraining of all true Christians,
not just German Christians. This is the true purpose and intent of
Zionism and the demagogue Einstein was merely a tool of World Zionism
and Jewry towards this end.
Zionistic Jews understand that true, primitive Christianity is the
mortal enemy of mongrel Judaism. This is why the Jews, like Einstein,
hated Nazi Germany so much, for National Socialist Germany advocated
primitive, positive Christianity in the 24th point of its Party
Platform.
For more information, contact:
CSCS, P.O. Box 188, Kodak, TN 37764
www.christianseparatist.org
This is one of the silliest and most flawed articles I have read in a very
long time.
Surprise, surprise, it is written by a Christian white
supremacist/separatist.
And you can prove that?
Oh dear Ben, you really have surpassed yourself.
Not my words, dearie. Just helping jacobsOn along.
.
- References:
- More on Einstein
- From: Ben Cramer
- Re: More on Einstein
- From: Tilly
- More on Einstein
- Prev by Date: Re: In the Beginning There was Terror
- Next by Date: Re: Wolfowitz at the World Bank
- Previous by thread: Re: More on Einstein
- Next by thread: Beyond Chutzpah
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
