Re: Kevin Myers and Darwin
- From: jl <jl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:50:42 +0000 (GMT)
In article
<2485fe01-e1f0-4bac-80d1-20ed6ebae183@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Cormac <cormac.bradaigh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 15, 2:08 pm, jl <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
------------------------------------ Limavady and the Roe ValleyHave you a better theory?
Roe Valley News Browser http://www.jochenlueg.freeuk.com
I'm not sure what you mean. The theory of evolution is one of the best
documented and least disproved theory in science. I don't think you can
find anything better.
Jochen
--
------------------------------------
Limavady and the Roe Valley
Roe Valley News Browser
http://www.jochenlueg.freeuk.com- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Apologies, I thought that you were contesting Darwin's Theory.
No need. Probably my fault for making my point badly. I have a habit of
doing that!
Jochen
--
------------------------------------
Limavady and the Roe Valley
Roe Valley News Browser
http://www.jochenlueg.freeuk.com
.
- References:
- Kevin Myers and Darwin
- From: Cormac
- Re: Kevin Myers and Darwin
- From: Westprog
- Re: Kevin Myers and Darwin
- From: EX_OWM
- Re: Kevin Myers and Darwin
- From: jl
- Re: Kevin Myers and Darwin
- From: Cormac
- Re: Kevin Myers and Darwin
- From: jl
- Re: Kevin Myers and Darwin
- From: Cormac
- Re: Kevin Myers and Darwin
- From: jl
- Re: Kevin Myers and Darwin
- From: Cormac
- Kevin Myers and Darwin
- Prev by Date: Re: Kevin Myers and Darwin
- Next by Date: Re: Kevin Myers and Darwin
- Previous by thread: Re: Kevin Myers and Darwin
- Next by thread: Re: Kevin Myers and Darwin
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|