Re: What the hell am I doing in sci?

Féachadóir wrote:

Scríobh "Sidheseeker" <sidheseeker@xxxxxxx>:

Luke Kelly wrote:


Celto-Roman

I believe the correct term is Romano Celtic..


Not necessarily. Romano-Celts are people like the Britons, Iberocelts
and Gauls who were conquered by the Romans and Romanised. Donal/Luke
is talking about Ireland, never invaded by the Roman empire but
Catholicised under the influence of the Roman church.



With the help of King Henry II, of course.

:-)

John Mullen
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 476 to 538 AD
    ... Britain at this time was ruled by the Britons under King Arthur not the ... discussed Alan Goldsmith's theory that the legend of King Arthur is ... the commander of a Roman rear guard contingent that ...
    (soc.history.ancient)
  • Re: 476 to 538 AD
    ... Britain at this time was ruled by the Britons under King Arthur not the ... discussed Alan Goldsmith's theory that the legend of King Arthur is ... the commander of a Roman rear guard contingent that ...
    (soc.history.ancient)
  • Re: 476 to 538 AD
    ... Britain at this time was ruled by the Britons under King Arthur not the ... discussed Alan Goldsmith's theory that the legend of King Arthur is ... the commander of a Roman rear guard contingent that ...
    (soc.history.ancient)
  • Re: Return Stonehenge says archdruid
    ... >> Don't you mean the indigenous Roman population? ... >> Britons are a mongrel race. ... There were no indigenous Britons. ... Wales was part of Roman Britain, though the Roman legions were not ...
    (sci.anthropology)
  • Re: Gauls in central France were not at all like Asterix
    ... cockiest Gaul, Asterix, led a brave rebellion against the Roman ... But a discovery in central France has led to a significant ... reassessment of the Gauls, who were, it transpires, much more advanced ...
    (sci.archaeology)