Re: Wonderful fiction

The Irish do not suffer patronising or indoctrination easily which is
why Freud was being honest -

"This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use
whatsoever" (Sigmund Freud - about the Irish)

The relativistic junk of the last century is basically a formal version
of the 1898 science fiction novel of H.G. Wells.Normally people are
not so silly to follow after 'time travel' but in this case,the
momentum carried this wishful think to an extreme.

Participants here may get an inkling of a nightmare that exists when
they start to realise that the basis for the 4th dimensional spacetime
emerges from the mouth of a fictional character and as a narrative
neccessity rather than anybody of substance -

"'Scientific people,' proceeded the Time Traveller, after the pause
required for the proper assimilation of this, 'know very well that
Time is only a kind of Space."

http://www.bartleby.com/1000/1.html

If you prefer the billion dollar contemporary version from Nasa then go
right on ahead and have a ball -

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

QUESTION 42


What does the word 'spacetime' mean?


It means that in our universe, 3-dimensional space and time form a
single indivisible new physical object which has 4 dimensions. All
physical laws and phenomena seem to require thinking about space and
time as this blended object. That's what Einstein's relativity theories

were all about.


http://einstein.stanford.edu/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In truth your flat Earth beliefs are far more preferable to the
empirical nonsense that spawned the Newtonian ballistic agenda and its
exotic relativistic extension. Portraying science fiction as a human
achievement is a nightmare by any standards ,that Irish people here
can make the comparison between the fictional 1898 novel and its exact
21st century equivalent statement via Nasa should normally shock people
into taking notice of exactly what lies behind it all.

I assure them it all originates with Newtonian and his concepts built
on the wrong value for axial rotation.





frank_doyle44@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
oriel36 wrote:
The people who are most likely to assault denominational Christianity
are from a group who adhere to a specific set of doctrines,determining
that the originators of these doctrines were 'geniuses' by virtue of
the difficulties involved with complicated material.It is,of
course,wonderful fiction and provides great reading for those who like
clever maneuvering.Unfortunately,it is more than just that,humanity now
needs an accurate version of celestial phenomena and especially the
correct of the motions of the Earth.

What happened in 1905 -

"Since he classes his absolute space together with real things, for him

rotation relative to an absolute space is also something real. Newton
might no less well have called his absolute space ``Ether'';"

http://www.mountainman.com.au/aether_0.html

The so-called 'relativistic revolution was based on Albert's rejection
of an aether/medium that Newton called 'absolute space'.

Here is what Newton actually believed -

"The fictitious matter which is imagined as filling the whole of space
is of no use for explaining the phenomena of Nature, since the motions
of the planets and comets are better explained without it, by means of
gravity; and it has never yet been explained how this matter accounts
for gravity. The only thing which matter of this sort could do, would
be to interfere with and slow down the motions of those large celestial
bodies, and weaken the order of Nature; and in the microscopic pores of
bodies, it would put a stop to the vibrations of their parts which
their heat and all their active force consists in. Further, since
matter of this sort is not only completely useless, but would actually
interfere with the operations of Nature, and [314] weaken them, there
is no solid reason why we should believe in any such
matter at all. Consequently, it is to be utterly rejected." Optics 1704
Newton


In short,there is no way to reject in 1905 what Newton rejected
centuries earlier so even for the most indifferent reader here,to be
patronised with the 'relativity' concept based on the Albert's
rejection of Newton's absolute space/aether is to go along with the
wonderful fiction of it all.It is also very damaging to Western
sensibilities for it introduces the idea that insincerity disguised as
tortured linguistic fireworks and equations can be portrayed as
achievements,even ultimate achievements.

Even to a casual observer, it is obvious that the Earth is flat. Yes, I
know the arguments against, you can go around the world and come back
to your starting point. I can go around Ireland from Dublin and come
back again from the South, even though I started out in a northerly
direction. Besides what has happened to the thousands of people who go
missing regularly? Many of them have fallen off the edge.

Heaven is above the Earth and Hell is below.

Frank Doyle

On behalf of the Flat Earth Society

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
    ... The MMX is indeed an "affirmation" of Special Relativity, ... You can clearly see how axial rotation to celestial sphere geometry ... "The fictitious matter which is imagined as filling the whole of space ... Newton is alive and has put you in your graves at least intellectually ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Again and again about the result of MMX
    ... The MMX is indeed an "affirmation" of Special Relativity, ... The MMX does not measure "the velocity of the Earth movement around the ... "The fictitious matter which is imagined as filling the whole of space ... Newton is alive and has put you in your graves at least intellectually ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: How long can they keep this up?
    ... The garden variety drum roll for the introduction of relativity is ... usual path is via jettisoning the idea of absolute space as it became ... about it is that Newton is pretty explicit about what he thinks of ... "The fictitious matter which is imagined as filling the whole of space ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Google please assign this group a moderator
    ... Here, QM and relativity rule. ... proves Newton incorrect. ... For some reason you're ... of physics runs too deep in your blood. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Einstein never heard of Principia
    ... but unfortunately Newton did not have the knowledge to ... Einstein was the first to realize that and exploit it when he ... Equivalce Principle and the Principle of Relativity. ... but Newton never realized that spacetime could be anything ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Loading