Re: An argument for anti abortionists

On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 18:13:36 -0000, "Duck" <duckkayak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>"An Mac Tíre Bán; (Whitewolf) @iol.ie>" <rayh(removespamblocker> wrote in
>message news:er8fm1ds5122c4i18mudvs1v2airh0vkdm@xxxxxxxxxx
>> On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:17:24 -0000, "Duck" <duckkayak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Clydeside Red" <myrealname@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>news:IrSdnfLQIsSts_reRVn-oQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> "Duck" <duckkayak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> news:43667bd7$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Apparently the Chinese regard it moral to abort while in labour
>>>>> through
>>>>> lethal injection to the head. I maybe in favour of early abortion
>>>>> since
>>>>> they're not much more than a fish and an unwanted child can not only
>>>>> be
>>>>> a terrible life for them but others as well, if they don't know any
>>>>> better then it's simply a moral issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> At this age (23 weeks I believe) this child seems aware and the nurse
>>>>> attending told the photographer that it happens regulary. Have a look
>>>>> and see if you agree...
>>>>
>>>> It does happen regularly, it's reflexive. Google neonate reflexex and
>>>> see which ones disappear. The Babinksi reflex is neat looking.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>*The baby gripping the doctors hand was a reflex that all babies share
>>>but
>>>wriggling around inside in reaction to an opening of the womb to thrust
>>>an
>>>arm out seems more than a knee tap.
>>>
>>
>> It's a baby, a young you or me Duck, don't let anyone tell you
>> different...
>
>*It's obviously a baby and for me way past abortion but early pregancy is
>a fishlike embryo and a long way from it.
>
>
>
>> Because those that tell you different want to kill that baby and so do
>> their
>> best to dehumanize it... It's their mindset set to murder...
>
>*Why is everything so simple to you?
>
>
>> to kill another
>> you or I... While that child is young, defenseless... And they who
>> murder such
>> a child think nobody sees...
>
>*And what of early abortions?
>
>
>
>>But we both know, God is watching and is keeping track,
>
>*Hope he's not making home movies...
>
>
>
>> and those who butcher the innocent will pay the price on Judgement Day!
>>
>>
>*There you go on about the IRA again....
>
>
>Duck
>

I'm sure that you, like me were the victim of the science teacher asking the
"farmers" (ie, anyone living 1 mile outside the city) to bring in some frog
spawn and it would be thrown inot a tank for us all to watch and record as it
grew... We'd draw diagrams of the first time the the blog grew legs and then
we'd draw more when it's front legs came to be... And more when it's "tail"
"dropped" off... And you'll remember your science teacher never once saying that
the original "blob" that "patrick" brought into the class was "not a frog yet,
we have to wait until he's got legs and arms and looks frog like"...

We all knew from the day that "blob" arrived in our fish tank that it was a
babyt frog, a frog that didn't look like a frog yet... But we didn't decide that
because it didn't have arms and legs and didn't look liker a frog that we might
kill it without our conscience coming at us...

It's the same with babies... So, early on they don't look like us, they haven't
develped their arms, legs, brain yet... So it's *alright* to murder them
because they "don't look like a person"... That's the liberal way of thinking...
If a "baby" is a "pain in the arse" then abort it... If you had sex with some
fella and became preggers, and now you feel that your baby might inhibit your
"further education" then it's ok, kill him... We'll all say it's "your choice"
scream the liberals... But they are in denial when they come to realise they
just told a mother to butcher her baby!!!

Not that liberals have any morals in the first place, pushing schools to take
give children abortions without even telling her parents, and advocating that a
married woman should have the right to an abortion without even telling her
husband... Now... it takes two people to make a baby... So what gives the
woman more right then the man who also was involved in creating the same child?

I could rant on about this for hours! But I'll spare you...

Ray


--
***************************************************************************
If your gonna burn the flag - wrap yourself in it first!
***************************************************************************
Website: http://www.eirefirst.com
Irish interest news: http://eirefirst.blogspot.com/
Email: rayh(removeSPAM)@iol.ie
***************************************************************************
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: An argument for anti abortionists
    ... >And you'll remember your science teacher never once saying that ... >we have to wait until he's got legs and arms and looks frog like"... ...
    (soc.culture.irish)
  • Re: Sticky hands vs. hard style one-steps
    ... emotional and some girls are more manly - so emotion in that case is ... > with the legs and hips, or armbar with the arms, legs and hips. ... punches - women arms weak. ... Maybe he grabs her neck ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
  • Re: Toilets
    ... Perhaps wizards have their own type of ghost poo. ... There's poo on the toilet paper ... What do you call a guy with no arms or legs in a pile of leaves? ...
    (alt.fan.harry-potter)
  • Re: Are the "mosaic theories" completely vaccuous?
    ... > |> by walking on your hind legs? ... While gibbons do walk semi-bipedally on the ground (they ... > also often use their arms in various ways), ... IOW, this evidence (gibbons walking, ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Dim Mak works!
    ... Certainly, you can use knife-edge strikes, and target points ... on arms and legs and torso. ... This is what the first few UFCs were about....allowing all the Dim Mak ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
Loading