Re: US shelved evidence discounting Iraq's WMD: report

ediebur@xxxxxxx wrote:
To *ME* and those who agree with me, your polls are bull***.

There are millions of people who believe as I do. We elected GW Bush to
the office of President of the USA, TWICE.

A lot of those voters, maybe not you, would love to take back that vote
by now

Quite the contrary. Many millions of Americans now wish they could vote
him into office for another term. In fact, I'd like to see him have a
couple more terms. He's done a wonderful job.

Lets review what has gone in this thread

Of course you mean what YOU think has gone on in this thread. You make
that clear further on when you inject childish statements of opinion,
not fact.


1) You claimed that Saddam smuggled his WMDs into Syria and that
accounts for the fact that we never found them. The evidence -- the Kay
report, but Kay said that it was possible that Saddam MIGHT have
smuggled a small amount of material into Syria and the book by the Irai
general but the general was reporting what he heard and, he was a high
ranking officer in Saddm's military which means he was a Baathist and a
FOS (Friend of Saddam. By your own statements, hardly a trustworthy
witness.

You credit me with using the Kay report as evidence. I haven't. Not
once. How convenient it is to just say anything you wish and think its
fact. It's not. I've stated my opinion. It's worth precisely the same
as your opinion. You are the one that keeps referring to some
mysterious "Us".

If you wish to continue to believe that the WMDS are all hidden in
Syria, that's your privilege but you need a lot more evidence than what
you have to convince the rest of us

There's that "Us" again. Do you have a mouse in your pocket? Do you
really feel you are the spokesman for some group that makes up your
"Us"?

I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I'm stating my opinion
on Usenet. The same thing you're doing. Unlike you however, I don't
take any credit for speaking for a group of "Us", (whoever that is).

2) The deaths of innocent Iraqis are all ultimately the fault of
Saddam
since he made the invasion necessary. Thus the invasion deaths caused
in US/CPA collateral damage were really Saddam's fault and not the US.
The deaths since GWB accomplished his mission are all the fault of
terrorists, ultimately. The reasoning is similar to the reasoning about
invasion related collateral damage.

Very good. You managed to get an entire summery out without altering
the truth.

Again you are, of course entitled to believe whatever nonsense you wish

Nonsense in YOUR opinion. That of course makes it the opinion of one.
Big deal. I think you're a small minded ***. That doesn't make you
one. It's just my opinion. You leftists always like to sound as if you
speak for someone. Hahahahahaahaha.

but these are not arguments, they are statements of your own belief,
which you are entitled to but attempting to foist them on others by
repitition accompanied by insults is a waste of electrons

"A waste of electrons", Ha. Did you think that little minded insult up
all by yourself? Thanks, it shows how childish you are.

Note that these statements are accompanied by a rather original
definition of terrorist as anyone who actively opposes the Iraqi
government.

And again you falsely accuse me of saying things I've never said.
You're a liar.

I've never said that anyone who actively opposes the Iraqi government
is a terrorist. I have said that anyone who picks up a WEAPON AND
ATTACKS THE IRAQ GOVERNMENT IS A TERRORIST. I put this in caps so even
a small minded idiot such as yourself can see it. Do try to remember
this time, ***.

You go on to say that any such Iraqi is not an Iraqi and is
a terrorist, by your definition.

More lies from you. Why do you lie about this? Are you really that
desperate?

The problem here is that your
definition of terrorist is unique to you and hardly shared by anyone
else. There is no argument here, just a statement of what you believe
to be true.

No such statement was made, so you're just continuing the same lie.
You're a liar. I showed that to the group when you lied about the
percentage of people who want the USA to leave Iraq immediately.
Remember? You lied and said it was 82% and tried to bluff your lie into
reality by offing a link to a poll that when checked, proved that you
had lied.

Just as ALL liars do, you attempted to cover your lying ass with the
famous "I'm sorry, I made a mistake". Hahahahahaaha LIAR.

3) Various polls documenting the discontent of Iraqis and the
occupation forces with the present Iraqi situation such that a large
percentage of Iraqis support attacks against occupation troops and a
scary proportion of the US military is confused about the purpose of
the occupation and wants out.

Hahaahahhaa. More bull***. "A scary proportion" Hahahahaaha Very
scientific. You fuckin clown.

Your reaction is is to discount the polls for no good reason other than
you don't like the conclusions and the polls disagree with your
information which you get from communication with unidentified field
grade officers. For all the evidence you give other than your own
disagreement you might as well have been communicating with your old
shoes. Not convincing.

You wouldn't be convinced that you had an ass if your head wasn't so
far up it.

My sources have scrambled eggs on their hats and are IN Iraq. Yours are
in your imagination and polls that happen to agree with your bull***.

Now, from what you have said and the little evidence you have offered
to back up your position, accompanied by ad hominem swipes at fucked up
leftists as it was, the only truth one can reasonably deduce from this
thread is that you are a blowhard, a particularly fanatical and
animated blowhard but that's about it.

Oh gosh! You've hurt me now. Hahahahaah.

Ok, my turn.

You're a sniveling coward who's done nothing in life but whine about
things you don't understand.

YOU have proven yourself to be a LIAR. I caught you red-handed. How can
you now expect ANYONE to believe a single think you say about anything?
Every statement you make has to be checked to see if it's another of
your LIES.

When you do get out of school and join REAL life, you'll see how
childish you sound now.

Exactly how old are you? By the lack of ability to prove your case and
the fact that you've resorted to lying to make a public argument, I'd
guess you to be about 15 years old. I have grandchildren your age.

What do you want to be when you grow up? Something different, or do you
still want to be a childish *** who lies and whines?

.

Loading