Re: ONLY 4 TO GO

On 28 Oct 2005 14:28:58 -0700, cosmicspin@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

>
>Patrick Dolan wrote:
>> On 28 Oct 2005 08:34:47 -0700, cosmicspin@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Norman Leonski wrote:
>> >
>> >> > It was Norm that started the whole thing when he wrote his threatening
>> >> > letter.
>> >>
>> >> My post wasn't threatening. It was informitive. I clearly stated in the
>> >> post that I had no intention of doing what could be done. I made the
>> >> post to let the slime ball know that he isn't invisable just because he
>> >> hides on the net.
>> >
>> >Whatever, that is obviously a blatant lie.
>>
>> No, it wasn't. I merely informed the sicko that one shouldn't think
>> one is not available for an "in-person" meeting just because one posts
>> to the Internet. Too many people think they can say things that they
>> wouldn't dare say to someone in person because of an imagined digital
>> anonymity.
>
>LOL, now you are in denial. I'll tell you what, I'll print up your
>post and show it to several collegues, they even include some who liked
>Bush. I'll see what they think.

You phony little cocksucker. You're going to show it to people who are
no longer Bush supporters and those who have consistently disliked
him. Yeah, that should get you the answer you're looking for. Ya
think?

You truly are one stupid fucker.

>> >Anyone can see the reason
>> >you wrote the post you did; it was to scare people that might say
>> >something you disagree with.
>>
>> You're quite wrong. You see what you wish to see. I may of actually
>> saved a lot of peoples lives by explaining the danger of saying things
>> on the Internet that invite reprisal. There are a bunch of people out
>
>Man, just stop the bull*** already! You know why you said it, so stop
>digging a deeper hole.

No, you seem to think that YOU know why I said it. That's not the same
thing.

>> >At least Bush and you have something in
>> >common... You both imply things with what you say, then you deny it
>> >because you never said it 'directly'. How many people say something
>> >'directly'. If someone says "I'll kill you", or "Next time I see you,
>> >I'll have a gun", wouldn't you say both are threats? Especially if you
>> >describe how you would go about shooting someone? A little disclaimer
>> >at the bottom does not discount a threat, we're not little kids here,
>> >alright?
>>
>> Again, you may believe anything you wish. I firmly deny what you've
>> accused me of doing. I made that totally clear in my disclaimer.
>
>Your disclaimer was there so you could cover your ass. Stop you petty
>lies, you're pathetic!

Again you think you know all! I said clearly what I meant.

>> >> As for your opinion, I'm not a person who likes war. I do know that war
>> >> is sometimes necessary. I believe this one to be that type of war. You
>> >> don't agree. Iron Mask doesn't agree. That's fine with me. What I have
>> >> a real problem with is people who like death of others. That type of
>> >> person is one sick motherfucker. Iron Mask is that type of person. The
>> >> person who made the first post of this thread is that type of person. I
>> >> do enjoy seeing sick motherfuckers like them suffer. It usually teaches
>> >> them a lesson.
>> >>
>> >
>> >And what do you consider yourself?
>>
>> That question is much to vague to answer.
>

I said:
>"What I have a real problem with is people who like death of others."

Then you pretend to know what I think and YOU say:
>You seem to be okay with death as long as it's happening to other
>people, especially Muslims.
>
>> >You seem to be quite fine with the
>> >information pertaining to dead Iraqis due to American imperialism.
>>
>> First, I don't believe that there is any American imperialism, so the
>> rest of your physic bull*** is meaningless.
>
>I don't believe that Iraq was a threat to America, so

in your opinion,

> the majority of
>your posts are poppy***.

As I've said, I don't give a rat's ass what you think. You're a
fucking idiot.

Look in the mirror and say "And I want world peace *giggle*" Toss your
blond hair and put an idiotic smile on your face and a blank
expression on your face.

Now you look and sound like you're a true leftist.

> As far as American Imperialism, you just
>have to look at how the executive branch has systematically exceeded
>the Legislative branch in War Powers, and you'll se what I'm talking
>about... Unless of course, you are in capable of reading anything other
>than Whitehouse approved papers.

You try so hard to sound like you know what you're talking about. Your
reference to War Powers is juvenile. The mark of an amateur.

>> >You
>> >consider others sick, but don't see the sickness in your own thoughts.
>>
>> There is no sickness in my thoughts.
>
>There's plenty of people in the asylum that say the same thing.

I can almost see you there listening to them. That does sound like
first hand knowledge.

>> >How sad... The saddest aspect about your opinions are that they really
>> >have no merit.
>>
>> Your opinion really doesn't matter to me. I think my opinions have
>> plenty of merit. So do others.
>
>They have no merit.

Yes, they do.

>You cannot backup a single reason why the US
>needed to attack Iraq..

Sure I can. I would be repeating the same thing others have said to
you and you have denied. I don't play that game with leftists. Ask
Beacon.

>> > In all due respect, how is the Iraq war necessary?
>>
>> Take all of the thousands of reasons given by others and my reasons
>> are among them. You of course disagree. I'm sure not going to repeat
>> the same information you've heard over and over.
>
>See? That's exactly what I hear from your fellow Bush groupies. I
>hear:
>"Hundreds of reasons, I don't want to explain them"
>"I cannot explain it because it's national security issue"
>
>You know what? It's all a bunch of bull***! You got nothing, just
>like the Whitehouse has nothing. When it's all said and done, the Bush
>Administration will be revealed as a bunch of criminals.

Typical leftist bull*** claim. The White house has something; it has
the guy that's running the USA living in it. He was elected twice to
fill the highest public office in the world. That just burns you idiot
leftists up, doesn't it? Too fucking bad.

>> >Why
>> >would the US need to disarm a nation that cannot hold a candle to it in
>> >weaponry?
>>
>> This simplistic, idiotic remark doesn't deserve an answer.
>
>Nice try. You shoot down the question, to make it look irrelavent.

No, you did that all by yourself.

>This is a common tactic used by anyone that has no substance to their
>argument.

Yawn!

>> >Also, why the sudden surge of worry about Iraq, it's not
>> >like you or Shogun were worrying about Iraq when Saddam was gassing
>> >Kurds.
>>
>> I certainly can't speak for Shogun, and you certainly can't speak for
>> me. Don't presume to know what I would have or currently think about
>> anything that I haven't told you how I think. To do so only makes you
>> look foolish.
>
>You evade the question, with Rumsfield like double-speak. How clear
>does one have to make the question for you not to evade it?

Take all of the bull*** out of the question and ask it IF, and only
IF it hasn't already been asked and answered a hundred or more times
in this group already.

I'll give you a hint; nothing you've asked fits that description. You
just parrot the typical leftist bull*** over and over and over and
expect someone to play your little leftist bull*** game. I won't. Too
fucking bad.

>> > Where were you when Rumsfield was shaking hands with Saddam,
>> >and the US was instigating war between Iraq and Iran...While providing
>> >the very WMDs that Bush blamed Saddam of possesing? It seems rather
>> >incredible that you guys are so willing to throw all reason out the
>> >window, just so you don't have to question your own bad calls.
>>
>> You fucking leftist ***'s sure like to pretend that you know what
>> others think. You don't.
>
>Actually I'm not leftist.

Yes, you are. You are, as you say, in "denial".

> I'm as conservative as they come. I voted
>for GW Bush when he ran against Gore. I've volunteered with countless
>Republican events, however I fail to see how Bush's current model for
>America is 'conservative'. The only thing conservative about the Bush
>Administration is the amount of money they are willing to donate to
>actual Americans.

Show me where GW Bush said; "I am, and always will be a conservative
President in the eyes of every conservative in the USA".

Please, I would love to see the quote.

What's that? You just made up words to say what YOU think?

You ARE a very typical leftist.

>> > You
>> >voted for a bad president, get over it.
>>
>> No, I voted for GW Bush both times and I'm now enjoying the insured
>> freedom that his stance in world affairs has won me. I know you don't
>> agree, but that's just too fucking bad, isn't it?
>
>I didn't vote for him the second time. I didn't vote for Kerry either.
> He was just a continuation of American spending. I don't believe that
>our dollars should be spent on stupidity. GW Bush is not fiscally
>conservative, and he's involving his religious views a little too much
>for my taste.

Would you like a little cheese with that whine?

> GW Bush hasn't brought any insured freedom. If he has,
>please outline those 'freedoms' that's he's insured. Please enlighten
>us all.

First you say "GW Bush hasn't brought any insured freedom", and then
you admit that it's possible that he has by asking for an example!

Do YOU even have a clue what you believe in?

>> >Now it's time to side with
>> >Americans and call Bush for what he is.
>>
>> I'm glad you've come to your senses. We should call him one of the
>> greatest Presidents that has ever held the office.
>
>LOL
>
>>
>> >His administration lied to ALL
>> >of us.
>>
>> It most certainly did not. You are a liar for saying so.
>
>Where's the WMDs? Where' the deals that Saddam was making with
>'yellowcake'?
>Where's the links with terrorists? LOL, that last one is a real
>kicker, given the bipolarity of baathist "resurrection" and Islamic
>radicals.

Swawk! Swawk! Polly want' a fucking cracker! Leftist speak lines 101,
102 and 103. You fucking parrot.

Asked and answered hundreds of times. Clean out your ears.

>> > What will it take for you to realize that Bush is not on YOUR
>> >side?
>>
>> It would take the belief in yours and others lies. I don't believe
>> you.
>
>Belief only goes so far. It's the facts that show the truth. You just
>have to look at transcripts from teh White house for the past 4 years
>to see the lies, or misinformations. You are just to stubborn to
>accept it.

Bull***. That leftist swawking has been said so many times it sounds
like a juvenile recording of a parrot.

Your mind is as closed as the proverbial virgin's knees.

>> >Will he have to start another pointless war in Syria?
>>
>> That's totally up to Syria. If Syria tries to invade another country
>> like Saddam did with Kuwait, then yes, Syria will fall just like
>> Saddam's Iraq did. Syria knows this. That's why Syria is behaving
>> itself and staying within the bounds set by the USA. You probably
>> don't agree with this either. Too fucking bad, isn't it?
>
>I wouldn't be so quick, foolish one. Russia and China are certainly
>going to get involved if this fiasco continues.

The sky is falling! The sky is falling, Chicken Little said with panic
protruding from his beak! The Russians are coming, the Chinese are
coming!

You're a fool, boy.

>> >Or
>> >startup a draft?
>>
>> That just scares the hell out of you doesn't it? Personally, I'd like
>> to see mandatory military enlistment. It would help make good men out
>> of people like you and peckerwood.
>
>LOL, you speak about freedom, yet you are supporting one of the
>hallmarks of fascism, or non-democratic governments.

No, I am not.

>> >Or maybe spend the US into ruin? When will you have
>> >the balls to take a stand?
>>
>> My courage has never been an issue. You don't know me so how can you
>> pretend otherwise?
>
>So what's conservative about Bush's spending then? Are in total
>agreement with it?

Are the Vikings, the Moonies? Who the *** did you mean to put in that
sentence? Proof read, idiot.

>> >You tell me to kiss your ass, but you're the one who's been doing the
>> >kissing. You've been kissing the ass of big-business and forsaking the
>> >US Constitution.
>>
>> No, I have not.
>
>Manidtory enlistment is a violation of the Constitution... And that is
>only one example of all the twisted beliefs you hold that threaten
>America. You are worse than a terrorist, because you can actually
>vote.

The Constitution has been amended many times, or haven't you noticed?

>> > >Instead of threatening people on usenet,
>>
>> I've not threatened anyone. That's a misconception that you've
>> convinced yourself of.
>
>As I said, I'll let others decide for themselves. We'll see what
>people think. I'll keep the poll as democratic as possible, just for
>you!

Let's review:
>LOL, now you are in denial. I'll tell you what, I'll print up your
>post and show it to several collegues, they even include some who liked
>Bush. I'll see what they think.

You phony little cocksucker. You're going to show it to people who are
no longer Bush supporters and those who have consistently disliked
him. Yeah, that should get you the answer you're looking for. Ya
think?

You truly are one stupid fucker.

>> > you should learn a little
>> >about what's happening in the world...
>>
>> I knew more about the world 50 years ago than you will ever learn.
>> Your posts have shown this to be true. Your impression of the world is
>> juvenile and your ignorance is obvious.
>
>You haven't written anything other than pure garbage and non-answers to
>very real questions from my part. Yet you somehow consider yourself
>'learned'? LOL, don't make me laugh anymore, please!

Very real, are you? Let's review again:

>LOL, now you are in denial. I'll tell you what, I'll print up your
>post and show it to several collegues, they even include some who liked
>Bush. I'll see what they think.

You phony little cocksucker. You're going to show it to people who are
no longer Bush supporters and those who have consistently disliked
him. Yeah, that should get you the answer you're looking for. Ya
think?

You truly are one stupid fucker.

>> >Because you seem to really seem
>> >to be lacking any sense of reality.
>>
>> You wouldn't know reality if it bit you on the ass.
>
>Nice come back, but once again no real rebutal

You have your head firmly inserted into your rebuttal.

>> You attempt to intimidate people with your aggressive stance upholding
>> the leftist ideals. You don't intimidate me. You humor me. I think of
>> you as a misguided, small minded, ignorant youngster that is still wet
>> behind the ears.
>
>I'm far from a youngster.

Is that by court order?

>I'm not upholding any leftist ideas
>aggresively? Where are you getting this from?

>From every fucking post you make, you stupid fucker.

>> It would be fun to meet you and see if my mental picture of you is
>> accurate.
>
>I wouldn't want to meet you. I only meet with people that can offer
>mental and educational stimulation... You offer neither.

I'm sure you meet lots of people, given your criteria for meeting
others. Damn, how DO you pick up your pizza?

"Don't talk to me, you pizza person! I only meet with people that can
offer mental and educational stimulation".

I'll bet your a real popular guy. I think the stimulation you've grown
accustomed to is south of your belt. Let go now, it's getting purple.

>> Oh my! Will you think that what I've said is a threat? Oh dear! A
>> stupid *** sucker like you probably would.
>
>Your mindless drivel isn't worth worrying about for me.

That's right. You only meet with people that can offer mental and
educational stimulation.

> Others seem to
>take it personally, I just note the irony of you 'informing' people
>their life is in danger if they speak their mind...

I've never said anything of the kind. You're a liar.

> While somehow supporting freedom. Like I've said many times before... I don't agree
>with the crap you're saying, but I'll defend your right to say it.

Well gosh, *** man. Let me just shuffle a bit and thank you softly
while never meeting your eyes. Does that make you feel better? You
conceited ***.

> You on the otherhand, wish nothing more than to silence opposite views,
>that's how anti-american you've become.

That's not true. Your lying again. You are quite the liar, aren't you?
Typical leftist.

>> You can let go of your pee-pee now. I won't be coming to see you.
>> There are enough jackasses to look at right here where I live.
>
>All your arguments lead to physical bullying.

No, none of them has. Again, you lie. Why do you think you can just
lie every time you want to?

>Desperate measures for a
>dying argument I guess. Go bother someone else that cares.

Why? Are you going somewhere? Away from this group? Wonderful. There
are more than enough of you leftist liars to go around. You won't be
missed.

.