WHY A FATWA AGAINST RUSHDIE AND NONE AGAINST ROTHSCHILD?
- From: Anonymous <cripto@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 14:13:43 +0200 (CEST)
WHY A FATWA AGAINST SALMAN RUSHDIE AND NONE AGAINST ROTHSCHILD WHO KILLS 500 million children across the world through his financial policy of starvation of countries?
Who in Iran works for those jews, SECRETLY?
beyond the SHOW, I need to know who is NOT a CLOWN in the Iranian Government, media and justice system there. WHO IS NOT A FREEMASSON IN IRAN TODAY??> WE NEED TO KNOW, N-O-W!!!!
ALL the 70 million IRANIANS IN IRAN AND ABROAD - MINUS- 200 families in Iran and abroad who control money and politics in Iran (today AND yesterday)
"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who
makes her laws"
Meyer Rothschild, the most powerful man who ever lived.
For many years the words international banker, Rothschild, Money and Gold have held a mystical type of fascination for many people around the world but particularly in the United States.
Over the years in the United States, the international bankers have come in for a great deal of criticism by a wide variety of individuals who have held high offices of public trust - men whose opinions are worthy of note and whose responsibilities placed them in positions where they knew what was going on behind the scenes in politics and high finance.
President Andrew Jackson, the only one of our presidents whose administration totally abolished the National Debt, condemned the international bankers as a "den of vipers" which he was determined to "rout out" of the fabric of American life. Jackson claimed that if only the American people understood how these vipers operated on the American scene "there would a revolution before morning."
Congressman Louis T. McFadden who, for more than ten years, served as chairman of the Banking and Currency Committee, stated that the international bankers are a "dark crew of financial pirates who would cut a man's throat to get a dollar out of his pocket... They prey upon the people of these United States."
John F. Hylan, then mayor of New York, said in 1911 that "the real menace of our republic is the invisible government which, like a giant octopus, sprawls its slimy length over our city, state and nation. At the head is a small group of banking houses, generally referred to as 'international bankers.'"
Were these leading public figures correct in their assessment of the situation, or were they the victims of some exotic form of paranoia?
Let's examine history analytically and unemotionally and uncover the facts. The truth, as it unfolds, will prove to be eye-opening and educational to those who are seeking to more clearly understand the mind-boggling events that have been (and are) taking place on the national and international scenes.
THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION:
- Prev by Date: WHY A FATWA AGAINST RUSHDIE AND NONE AGAINST ROTHSCHILD?
- Next by Date: WHY A FATWA AGAINST RUSHDIE BUT NONE AGAINST ROTHSCHILD?
- Previous by thread: WHY A FATWA AGAINST RUSHDIE AND NONE AGAINST ROTHSCHILD?
- Next by thread: WHY A FATWA AGAINST RUSHDIE BUT NONE AGAINST ROTHSCHILD?