@@ The fuel behind Iran's nuclear drive @@
- From: "Arash" <A7000@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 05:17:42 -0400
August 24, 2005
The fuel behind Iran's nuclear drive
By David Isenberg
disenberg [AT] basicint.org
Tel: 1-202-546-8055 x103
Much of the argument over the intentions of Iran's nuclear program revolves around a
single proposition that goes like this. Given that Iran has huge oil and gas
reserves, it has no need for nuclear power for domestic energy needs and thus its
nuclear program will be used for nuclear weapons.
Like much so-called conventional wisdom, is this is a highly misleading and debatable
Certainly, the fact that a state is pursuing a nuclear program per se, even if it is
a nuclear proliferator, is not always a cause for alarm for the United States.
Earlier this year, the U.S. announced an agreement with India (until recently a
target of U.S. sanctions, even under the current U.S. president) to strengthen the
utilization of nuclear energy in its energy mix.
[India which possesses a nuclear arsenal and has refused to sign both the NPT and the
Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, was "REWARDED" for its violations, the full nuclear
cooperation of U.S. This is a straightforward "VIOLATION" of the NPT by the U.S.,
which forbids signatories from exchanging nuclear materials or support with
non-signatories. Thus, U.S. is in absolute violation of NPT].
The Foreign Affairs Select Committee of England's parliament said in March 2004 that
based on a study it commissioned, "It is clear ... that the arguments as to whether
Iran has a genuine requirement for domestically produced nuclear electricity are not
all, or even predominantly, on one side".
Some U.S. arguments against Iran "were not supported by an analysis of the facts",
the committee added, noting that much of the natural gas flared off by Iran - which
U.S. officials say could be harnessed instead of nuclear power - was not recoverable
for energy use.
Consider the following points.
* First, Iran's energy situation today is quite different from the late 1970s, when
the Shah's regime also pursued nuclear technology, a pursuit that did not seem so
alarming to the West at the time!
David Kay, former head of the Iraq Survey Group, speaking in November 2004 at a forum
sponsored by the Center for Strategic and International Studies said:
The first thing - of what we do know, and it's amazing how many Americans seem
to skate over this - the first nuclear reactor given to Iran was given by the United
States in 1967 - a five-megawatt trigger reactor, research reactor, under the
Eisenhower Atoms for Peace Program. Still operated ... The other thing that Americans
forget is that in 1974, the Shah announced a policy of 23,000 megawatts [23
GigaWatts] of nuclear energy in Iran. The U.S. reaction? [Former US national security
adviser and secretary of state] Henry Kissinger beat down the door to be sure that
two U.S. constructors, General Electric and Westinghouse, had a preferred position in
selling those reactors. We did not say, "it's a stupid idea, why would you want to do
that when you are flaring gas and you have immense oil reserves?" We said, "That is
very interesting; it's an example of how the Iranian economy is moving and becoming
Imagine in Iranian ears how it sounds now when we denigrate that capacity. They
remember. We were sellers of nuclear reactors and wanted to be sellers of nuclear
reactors to the Shah.
[See: U.S. officials sang a different tune in 70's:
Consider that just a year or so prior to the 1979 Iranian revolution, the country was
producing more than 6 million barrels a day of oil and its domestic consumption was
less than 10% of that output. Its annual natural gas production (almost all in the
form of associated gas) was roughly about 12 billion cubic meters of which some 9.5
billion cubic meters was exported to the Soviet Union and only 20% was consumed
domestically. Iran's population was about 35 million. Meanwhile, Iran had signed a
number of nuclear power construction contracts with France and Germany and was
negotiating with others for additional ones.
The stated objectives of these undertakings were to generate electricity and
desalinate water. But according to the pre-revolution politicians there was also
always an attempt to explore the nuclear technology for military purposes. But there
was no overt opposition to the Shah's nuclear ambitions because of friendly relations
between Iran and U.S.
In fact, president Gerald Ford signed a directive in 1976 offering Tehran the chance
to buy and operate a U.S.-built reprocessing facility for extracting plutonium from
nuclear reactor fuel. The deal was for a complete "nuclear fuel cycle" - reactors
powered by and regenerating fissile materials on a self-sustaining basis.
The construction of nuclear power plants in Iran has been contemplated for more than
30 years. The Shah argued that hydrocarbon resources would be too valuable to burn by
the beginning of 21st century and most of Iran's electricity generation must be
supplied from nuclear power plants by then.
After the Iran-Iraq war at the end of the 1980s, the need for electricity generation
for reconstruction of the war-damaged economy was evident and as the maximum export
of hydrocarbon resources was to be achieved for foreign exchange requirements, the
attention was focused on rebuilding the Bushehr nuclear power plant.
Today, Iran has a population of more than 65 million and most people are choking from
air pollution. The country produces some 4 million barrels of oil a day of which
about 1.5 million are consumed domestically.
Natural gas production has skyrocketed and almost all of it is consumed domestically
and the share of natural gas of total energy consumption has more than tripled and a
very significant portion of that is used to generate power. Incidentally, utilization
of oil or natural gas for power generation, though more benign than coal, is not
A recent article in Foreign Policy journal noted:
Iran is the second-largest oil producer in the Organization of Petroleum
Exporting Countries [OPEC] and has the world's second-largest natural gas reserves.
But its energy needs are rising faster than its ability to meet them. Driven by a
young population and high oil revenues, Iran's power consumption is growing by around
7% annually, and its capacity must nearly triple over the next 15 years to meet
Where will the electricity come from? Not from the oil sector. It is retarded by
U.S. sanctions, as well as inefficiency, corruption and Iran's institutionalized
distrust of Western investors.
Since 1995, when the sector was opened to a handful of foreign companies, Iran
has added 600,000 barrels per day to its crude production, enough to offset depletion
in aging fields, but not enough to boost output, which has stagnated at around 3.7
million barrels per day since the late 1990s.
Almost 40% of Iran's crude oil is consumed locally. If this figure were to rise,
oil revenues would fall, spelling the end of the strong economic growth the country
has enjoyed since 1999. Plugging the gap with natural gas is not possible - yet.
Iran's gigantic gas reserves are only just being tapped, so Iran remains a net
* Second, as a sovereign nation Iran is entitled to make its own sovereign decisions
as to how provide for its own energy needs.
Under "Article IV" of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty [NPT], member states are
assured access to the benefits of civilian nuclear energy.
Article IV of NPT:
Parties [i.e. IRAN] have the "inalienable right" to develop ... nuclear energy & to
acquire nuclear technology.
Iran is a resource-rich country and has all the rights to use its resources as it
sees fit. Among these resources there are several uranium mines whose energy contents
cannot be overlooked. Expecting Iran to disregard this valuable resource is
irrational, not to mention that taking away that much energy from the free market is
an irresponsible proposition.
On the other hand, helping Iran to extract, process and use this resource in a joint
operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) could help resolve many
political as well as financial problems.
* Third, the large oil and gas reserves that Iran possesses do not mean that Iran can
use oil and gas at no cost. It is not well appreciated that Iranian oil production
has dropped from a peak of more than 6 million barrels per day in 1974 to about 3.4
barrels per day in 2002.
Years of political isolation, recurring war and U.S. sanctions have deprived the oil
sector of needed investment. Iran's share of total world oil trade peaked at 17.2% in
1972, then declined to 2.6% in 1980, but has since recouped to roughly 5%.
In 2002, earnings from oil and gas made up more than 70% of total government
revenues, while taxes made up about 20%. After the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq war, the
National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) launched a reconstruction program to restore
Since 1994, production has averaged 3.6 million barrels per day, although this is
still roughly half of Iran's 1974 levels. The government hopes that foreign finance
and technology will help raise Iran's output to 5.6 million barrels per day by 2010
and 7.3 million barrels per day by 2020.
In fact, the oil and gas that Iran has are almost as expensive as the oil and gas
that other countries don't have. To be able to use oil or gas as a feed for an
industry (eg. power generation), Iran has to develop the resources.
Now, once developed and produced, from an economic point of view, oil can be treated
as a commodity, which has a value.
The monetization of gas is more difficult, but not if you have ready markets around
you and also if you can use that gas to boost your oil production capacity. In fact,
considering the reality that the majority of Iran's oil and gas reserves are in the
south and the country's population centers are in the north, it makes more sense to
export the oil and gas in the south (oil from the terminals and gas through pipelines
and gas value-add projects) rather than pump it to the north and translate it into
One example explains the logic of this argument - no one has so far posed the
question why Iran actually buys oil from Caspian sources. The simple answer is that
it makes economic sense: Caspian crude is closer to Iran's northern refineries and
the utilization of Caspian crude in the north frees up oil in the south for export.
The only argument that can be used regarding Iran's oil and gas reserves compared to
other countries is the fact that Iran has secure domestic supplies as compared to
other countries that are importers of oil and gas.
However, if Iran as a country manages also to secure its own indigenous supply of
nuclear fuel, then the equation changes and it becomes more of an economic
With regard to its gas reserves, it bears noting that there are needs for gas in Iran
that are much higher priorities than the construction of gas power plants. As
academics William Beeman and Thomas Stauffer noted:
First, gas is vitally needed for reinjection into existing oil reservoirs
[repressurizing]. This is indispensable for maintaining oil output levels, as well as
for increasing overall, long-term recovery of oil.
Second, natural gas is needed for growing domestic use, such as in cooking fuel
and domestic heating (Iranians typically use kerosene for both), where it can free up
oil for more profitable export. New uses such as powering bus and taxi fleets in
Iran's smoggy urban areas are also essential for development.
Third, natural gas exports - via pipelines to Turkey or in liquefied form to the
sub-continent - set an attractive minimum value for any available natural gas. With
adequate nuclear power generation, Iran can profit more from selling its gas than
using it to generate power.
Fourth, the economics of gas production in Iran are almost backwards, certainly
counter-intuitive. Much of Iran's gas is "rich" - it contains byproducts, such as
liquid-petroleum gas [LPG, better known as propane], which are more valuable than the
natural gas from which they are derived. Iran can profit by selling these
derivatives, but not if it burns the natural gas to generate power.
Furthermore, Iran adheres to OPEC production quotas, which combine oil and natural
gas production. Therefore Iran cannot simply increase natural gas for export to make
up for what it burns at home.
Finally, there is another important strategic element to consider. Iran derives
strategic significance from its status as an oil and gas exporter. This is a status
that Iran would like to maintain, and as such any initiative that would maximize
Iran's potential for hydrocarbon exports has a strategic value for Iran.
* David Isenberg (http://www.basicint.org/about.htm#Staff), a senior analyst with the
Washington-based British American Security Information Council
(http://www.basicint.org), has a wide background in arms control and national
security issues, and brings with him close to 20 years experience in this field,
including three years as a member of DynMeridian's Arms Control & Threat Reduction
Division, and nine years as Senior Analyst at the Center for Defense Information. He
has a BA in International Studies from the University of Oregon and an MA in
International Affairs from American University.
Gerald Ford, 38th President of the United States (1974-1977)
The documents were found on the website of the Gerald R. Ford Library and Museum in
Ann Arbor, Michigan (http://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov).
Two documents in particular, dated April 22, 1975 and April 20, 1976, show that the
United States and Iran held negotiations for cooperation in the peaceful use of
nuclear energy and the United States was willing to help Iran by setting up uranium
enrichment and fuel reprocessing facilities.
Shah & Ford in the Oval office on May 15, 1975.
President Gerald Ford and the Shah of Iran review the troops during a State Arrival
Ceremony on the South Lawn of the White House, on May 15, 1975.
President and Mrs. Ford on the South Portico of the White House with the Shah and
Shahbanu of Iran, May 15, 1975.
Henry Kissinger enjoying kosher food
Past Arguments Don't Square With Current Iran Policy
The U.S. and Iran: Democracy, Terrorism, and Nuclear Weapons
NO Nuclear double standards
Backlash Builds Against Cheney's 'Guns of August'
An offer Iran MUST refuse
More neo-crazy media sycophant LIES about Iran
What The Neo-Crazies Knew
EU vs. Iran - Who's Right?
Iran should refer U.S. to Security Council for violating UNSCR-984
Castration of NPT - U.S. instantly tore up NPT for India, so why should Iran obey a
torn up agreement!
U.S. ripped NPT into pieces; Iran must withdraw from this annulled treaty
U.S. proliferation rhetoric and reality
Ambassador Bolton's Agenda
Iran's INALIENABLE RIGHT to uranium enrichment
A Palliative for Neo-Crazy Lies
Inalienable right without discrimination
U.S. doesn't want to disarm even though it promised to do so
UN Referral ? Not
What Iranian obligations? What breaches? America's lies, lies, lies...
Memo to slimy senators
U.S. promised in 2000, to get rid of it's nukes!
U.S. has violated Iran's NPT rights!
Iran's diplomatic masterpiece
Bush to sabotage NPT
West's repeated violations of "Article IV & I" against Iran
Israel guns for Iran - Why?
U.S. wants definition of NPT 'noncompliance' changed!!!
NTP for dummies
CNN's Wolf Blitzer & David Albright: Jews global campaign against Iran
The Real Threat From John Bolton
81-mm smoking rockets
U.S. plans to destroy NPT
Nuts to Bush
Iran's logic proven correct to the entire World
Sandbagging the NSG (Nuclear Suppliers Group)
Sandbagging the EU
Jew tells Bush to lie about Iran
Targeting Non-existent Nukes?
Blindly Backing Israel Against Iran
Condi Desperate to Stop EU-China-Iran Chain Reaction
The Impossible Dream in the State of the Union Address
Bay of Pigs part 2, CIA-Israeli-MEK
Threatening Iran - despite the evidence
Iran's having the capability to enrich uranium is not even tantamount to having the
capability to produce the essentially pure uranium-235 required to make a nuke
Dangerous Delusions About Iran
Thwarting the Neo-Crazies
Trashing the IAEA Again
U.S. keeps lying about Iran again & again
Iran's Stealthy Nukes
Uranium-Enrichment Myths Busted
Iran Plays by the Rules - No Fair!
Nuclear Bait and Switch
The myth of Iranian nukes
North Korea has what Iraq didn't
Iran has absolute right to enrich uranium
Iran is in full compliance with NPT & IAEA
Greatest danger to the region...
Allah Is the Greatest
Déjà Vu, ElBaradei?
Bush & the three Persian Magi
Casus Belli: High-Pitched Whine
Persian Gulf War IV
America's crying wolf over 'nukes'
Iran has the right to acquire nukes
Iran: Nukes déjà vu
Iran neglected to say, Mother, may I?
Israeli paranoia on Iran 'nukes'
Bush hawks foiled again
A nuke-free Middle East?
A nuclear expert radio interviews on Iran:
August 2, 2005
July 23, 2005
May 7, 2005
May 4, 2005
April 9, 2005
February 16, 2005 (Part 1)
February 16, 2005 (Part 2)
February 5, 2005
December 4, 2004
- Prev by Date: Re: British supported Terrorist mullahs responsible for Cinema Rex massacre
- Next by Date: Re: European Scums are worried about the gas the steal from Iranians
- Previous by thread: @@ Parsi Chronicle @@
- Next by thread: @@ Things not going well for JEW; so enter yet again the MEK terrorists & their large satellite photos coming out of filthy turk Qajar-Azedanllo's cunt. Next, Bahai cultists will cry genocide @@