@@ Playing hardball - And no sign of backing down @@



Economist
August 18, 2005


Playing hardball
And no sign of backing down


In less than a month's time, Iran's new government, which has yet even to be sworn in
by parliament, could find itself in the dock at the UN Security Council for
restarting nuclear work last week at its uranium-conversion plant at Isfahan.
Breaking the seals put on Isfahan by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA),
the UN's nuclear guardian, also broke the terms of Iran's agreement last year with
Britain, France and Germany to suspend all such dabbling with uranium and also with
plutonium, two materials that could be used for bomb-making, while their talks
continued. Restarting the plant likewise defied repeated IAEA resolutions, including
one passed at an emergency meeting last week, calling on Iran to suspend all such
nuclear work.

For a government barely in office, this is giving quick offence. Why take on the
world so quickly? And what are the chances now of curbing the regime's presumed
nuclear ambitions?

The next diplomatic set-piece will be at the IAEA, whose inspectors will report
formally on September 3rd about just what Iran is up to at Isfahan, where yellowcake
(uranium ore) is converted into a gas that can later be spun in centrifuge machines
to make usable uranium. Iran insists that it has every right under the Nuclear
Non-Proliferation Treaty to make uranium fuel for civilian power reactors, and that
is all it wants to do. But two decades of lies and evasions uncovered by inspectors
leave many governments unconvinced.

After rejecting out of hand a raft of European proposals?including co-operation in
other civilian nuclear technologies, as well as improved trade, political and
security ties?Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has said Iran will present some
ideas of its own to break the deadlock. Yet its new chief nuclear negotiator, Ali
Larijani, appointed at the behest of the country's ruling clerics, insisted this week
that uranium conversion will never be stopped; future talks, he said, would concern
only the conditions under which Iran will restart work at an enrichment plant it is
building at Natanz.

If Iran sticks to its guns, the IAEA's board will reconvene later in September, with
little choice but to refer it to the Security Council. There the stance of Russia and
China, both veto-wielding members, will be crucial. Indeed, Iran may well be counting
on their help. Yet Russia, increasingly worried about Iran's intentions, would likely
back an initial resolution calling on Iran to comply with IAEA requests.

It could help too, argues Iran-hating JEW Henry Sokolski
(http://rightweb.irc-online.org/ind/sokolski/sokolski.php) of the Israeli-run
Non-Proliferation Policy Education Centre, NPEC
(http://www.npec-web.org/pages/biohenry2003.htm), a Washington-based think-tank, if
the IAEA's board or the council were to call for nuclear co-operation with Iran to be
suspended until inspectors are certain they have a full accounting of its nuclear
past. That would give Russia legal cover formally to suspend its work on Iran's
Bushehr reactor.

China then might be loth to cast a lone veto. But the difficulty of getting beyond a
wrist-slap from the council explains why the Europeans have been in no rush to get
there. By reacting calmly in the face of the crisis Iran has now provoked, they hope
to keep it squarely on the spot. Iran's tactics, by contrast, are to force the pace
in the hopes of cracking European solidarity, splitting the Europeans from America,
and appealing over their heads to those governments chary of setting a restrictive
precedent on nuclear fuel-making that could hamper their own nuclear ambitions.
Iran's recent intemperate behaviour ought to strengthen the Europeans' hand. Yet the
difficulties of keeping even the European three on message are already apparent.
Caught up in his own re-election effort, Germany's chancellor, Gerhard Schröder,
broke ranks publicly by ruling out any future military action against Iran (none is
planned).

The irritation that caused among British and French diplomats, however, is nothing
compared with the difficulty they and America will face if Iran continues to balk.
Theoretically, the Security Council could take a whole range of measures to make Iran
uncomfortable: from selective visa bans for those involved in its nuclear programme,
through embargoes of various kinds, to tough economic sanctions. But there is no
consensus on any of these.

The UN is not the only recourse. But for their part the Europeans, unpractised at
common coercive diplomacy, are only just starting to think through the ramifications
of what might be needed. One idea doing the rounds if diplomacy goes on failing is
for a maritime cordon, based on the practice of the American-led Proliferation
Security Initiative, PSI (http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/prof_e.asp), to stop shipments
related to Iran's nuclear and other weapons programmes: a sort of PSI for the Persian
Gulf region.

But making such a cordon tight and effective would be hard, especially without full
support from Iran's neighbours, argues Michael Knights
(http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC10.php?CID=13) in a recent paper for
NPEC (http://www.npec-web.org/projects/Iran/Paper050620IranKnights.pdf).

Meanwhile Iran has already hinted that if push came to shove, it would not be shy of
using its own weapons: chiefly its oil and gas, but it also has a growing navy of its
own.

It shows no signs of blinking first.


http://www.economist.com/images/20050820/3405MA2.jpg
Photo: Ali Larijani, nuclear negotiator

http://www.economist.com/world/africa/displayStory.cfm?story_id=4300284


.



Relevant Pages

  • Paranoid Conspiracy site
    ... nuclear bomb in an American city, killing 10,000 to 100,000 civilians. ... The U.S. government will blame Al Qaeda or Iran, ... to launch an Oil Bourse that will trade oil for euros instead of ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • An exchange of letters??????????
    ... The thing that really irks me is how our government can be so arrogant as to ... strike against any government or other entity that issues a "threat" against ... Elham did not mention the nuclear dispute - the main obstacle between ... U.N. Security Council motion censuring Iran for refusing to cease enrichment ...
    (alt.politics)
  • @@ "Stolen Iranian Laptop", GLADIOs new campaign of misinformation @@
    ... U.S. Seeks to "Prove" Iran's Nuclear Aims ... senior American intelligence officials called the leaders of the ... The U.S. documents, the Americans acknowledged from the start, do not prove that Iran ... The U.S. government briefing for officials of the United Nations' International ...
    (soc.culture.iranian)
  • U.S. demands Russia to freeze Irans nuclear projects
    ... Iran, apparently hinting at Russia, to immediately freeze those projects, ... "No government should permit new nuclear transfers to Iran, ... "This is obviously an opinion of an individual, not of the U.S. government. ...
    (soc.culture.iranian)
  • Re: unions
    ... The North Koreans would take out Seoul, ... But the fact of the matter is that the NKs DO NOT have a workable bomb. ... They're only probationary members of the nuclear club at this point. ... Iran also contemplates an end to "any material support to Palestinian ...
    (rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated)

Loading