Re: Way forward for West is religion of non-religion
- From: "mash_ghasem" <ghyath_abadi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Jul 2005 16:26:51 -0700
A very good article CTG jan. Thanx.
CTG wrote:
> A good Article to read :
>
> http://www.capetimes.co.za/index.php?fSectionId=273&fSetId=160&fArticleId=2628590
> July 18, 2005
>
> By Tim Lot
>
> What were the suicide bombs made of? Acetone peroxide, say the police.
> Hate and evil, add the rest of us, and outrage at something or other (no one
> is sure what). But at a more fundamental level, the bombs were made of an
> elemental ancient substance, a substance as crucial to human life as oxygen
> or food. The bombs were made of meaning.
>
> I suspect that in destroying themselves and the innocents around them,
> each of the young men were not driven by any crazed bloodlust or need for
> revenge for transgressions in Iraq. They were driven by what in their terms
> would be a need for virtue, a need to send a fireball of meaning into the
> uncomprehending world.
>
> The meaning said this: my life is not futile and my death is not
> final. This carnage has a higher purpose than anything the barren ceremonies
> of the West can offer me with its expensive gewgaws, watered-down religions,
> trips to the leisure centre and celebrities.
>
> This is a terrifying reality - that these bombers want nothing in
> return for their lives other than what they perceive to be the virtue of
> martyrdom. But as usual in incidents where it is suspected that al-Qaeda is
> involved, no demands were made. The point was to kill non-believers and thus
> gain not only a place in heaven but also a paradoxical assertion at the
> exact point of detonation of the absolute reality and significance of their
> own lives.
>
> This is not specifically a criticism of Islam, or even fundamentalist
> Islam. In fact, there is something weirdly admirable in the fundamentalist
> Islamist, however maniacal, compared, say, with his wishy-washy, half-baked
> Anglican counterpart. Because the real difference between a fundamentalist
> Muslim and a moderate Christian (or a moderate Muslim for that matter) is
> surely that they really, really do believe.
>
> They don't use their religious custom as social glue, or conventional
> ritual, or a way of fitting in. They talk the deadly talk and they walk the
> deadly walk.
>
> The difference between a fundamentalist and a moderate is that the
> fundamentalist is not playing games, at least not games that he is conscious
> of. In fact, "I'm not playing games" is one of the meanings that the
> bombings expressed. This is another way of saying: "I am the hero of my own
> life. I have the courage of my terrible convictions. I will not flinch in
> fulfilling my bloody destiny." Again, this is not suggesting that Islam is
> "mad".
>
> It is no madder than Christianity, where we have a whole raft of
> leaders and politicians who seem quite happy to believe that 2 000 years ago
> a man performed miracles and then died to rise again. The only difference
> being that, I suspect, most Christians in the UK do not really, really
> believe it. They just say they do, even to themselves, whistling in what
> they secretly recognise to be the dark.
> Christian faith is dying in the West, and in Britain it is nearly dead
> (deduct all the people who are trying to get their kids into the local
> school and it looks even more moribund).
>
> In the meantime, man's desperate thirst for meaning and heroism
> continues.
>
> What can we offer? A few drinks down the pub, some nice glittering
> objects, sex, entertainment, a safe refuge for family and friends, a
> reasonably rich and stable society. Surely that is enough? Sometimes, but
> not for anyone with a spiritual imagination (and that may be most of us).
>
> Many of us get by, happy enough to await our eventual extinction
> through old age or disease, distracting ourselves with toys and work,
> bringing up our kids till they push us aside and into the grave. Others find
> a gigantic and growing void in the place where meaning should be, a place
> they fill with endless millions of prescriptions of Prozac, binge-drinking,
> self-harm, crack cocaine and reality TV.
>
>
> The bombers are lying to themselves, just as we are, but they are
> doing it in a more committed, one might even say, more honest way. This is
> their way of saying life is not a joke and death is not a rumour. This, the
> life we are living, is real and deadly, beautiful and terrifying. We must
> burn away the illusion, they say. In their case, it is simply, tragically,
> to reveal another illusion.
>
> But is there anything but illusion, any truth about the world that
> could give the atomised, lost century a meaning powerful enough to act as a
> buffer and a prophylactic against suicide bombers? Are there truths worth
> living for beyond family, finance and fun? Because if there aren't, make no
> mistake, more bombers will come, and will succeed.
>
> I believe that meaning is there - in the sacredness of life itself, in
> the deep mysteries of science, in the magic of collective storytelling, in
> the cage of time and space we all have to share. But we lack the language to
> express it, at least collectively. We need to find one, and we will find
> one, but it will take not years, but generations.
>
> The American academic Sam Harris concludes his brilliant book The End
> of Faith by saying that the way forward for the West lies in "religions of
> non-religion", world humanist philosophies such as Buddhism and Taoism.
> These schemes of thought have also been hijacked by the religious, but at
> their root they do not talk about God, but man.
>
> They are rational, have no dogmas, are beautiful and if not "true"
> then at least not demonstrably absurd to the modern, sceptical mind.
> Mysticism, Harris adds, is a rational enterprise. Religion is not.
> He's right and fundamentally, vitally, globally right. We need
> mysticism. We need "faith" (I could spend another article defining what I
> mean by that). But we have to outgrow the infantilism of our religions, both
> traditional (primarily Judeo-Christian and Islamist) and modern
> (consumerism, individualism, desiccated rationalism).
>
> There is a life of the mind. There is a scientific basis that combats,
> even destroys, the deadening modern myth of materialism. Quantum physics
> reveals us to be ghosts flicking in and out of existence, each locked in a
> private box of relative time and space.
>
> There is no "material", no stuff. We are patterns of energy, in a
> timeless now, forged in the stars, our ancestors fish and sea and gas and
> space, the void itself.
>
> Our lives do have meaning. Our deaths do not negate it, but affirm it.
> Existence is mysterious, even magical. And you do not have to be religious
> to believe it. Only intelligent. Only imaginative. Only human.
>
> But until the religion virus disappears for ever, we will never, never
> apprehend what the truth is about the illusion that the bombers were
> pursuing - so lost are we in our own myths, lies and evasions, in our
> pointless flight from and our relentless denial of the terrors and beauties
> of both life and death and existence itself. -
>
>
> begin 666 trpix.gif?&rdm=54526770&dlv=631,17573,112432,136448,657721&kid=136448&chw=9136448-&tcs=&bls3=111000A&bls4=010001111138&ucl=111111A&uid=1&dmn=.jetstream.xtra.co.nz&scx=1024&scy=768&scc=32&jav=1&sta=,,,1,,,,,,,0,0,0,13524,13518,13510,4035,0&iid=112432&bid=657721
> K1TE&.#EA`@`"`(#_`,# P ```"'Y! $`````+ `````"``(```("A%$`.P``
> `
> end
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Attention RBK, Deev, Peace, Mashti, Haftkhat etc...More groups to "hit"
- Next by Date: Re: petiton online: Open Letter to Mr. Kofi Annan, the UN Secretary General
- Previous by thread: Way forward for West is religion of non-religion
- Next by thread: Re: Way forward for West is religion of non-religion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|