Re: LETTER TO PRESIDENT BUSH
- From: "hang on little tomate" <tomatoes>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 13:55:02 +0200
nanya, pourquoi free.fr ?
il y a surement un autre hebergement gratuit pro bush en amerique non ?
"kim hook" <ade_kimhook2002@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
42dc31b0$0$6479$636a15ce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> LETTER TO PRESIDENT BUSH
> A NEW AGENDA
>
> The Honorable George W. Bush
> President of the United States
> Washington, DC
>
> Dear Mr. President,
> Allow us to offer you our heartiest congratulations on your re-election.
> Everywhere, the freedom fighters are happy to fight under your leadership
> for four more years. This success rewards your personal commitment to
> extend democracy and freedom in the world. You have not yield; you have
> not rest; you have not relent in waging this struggle for freedom and
> security for the free people. A free Afghanistan and soon a free Iraq are
> the tangible results of your policy.
>
> Free world Academy takes this opportunity for monitoring the main world
> challenges that are expected in a near future. We hope that this
> contribution to a new agenda would be useful and could catch your own
> advisor's attention.
>
> We will mainly focus on the present war and its main issues. Right now,
> successful operations have been balanced by an increase of
> misunderstanding in some countries. For example, there has been debate
> over exactly who is a terrorist or what terms like "the war on terrorism"
> represent. Europeans plead that terrorism is just a matter of police and
> justice. They refute the word "war" and claim that there is no war at all.
> This debates illustrates that some concepts are not understood. It is not
> just a communication problem. It could mean that these concepts are not
> appropriate to the policy and could evenly lead to confusion.
>
> Since creating concepts is the Free World Academy's core business, our
> contribution will propose some global ideas more operative than those used
> in the past. In short, your Administration may try to better define who is
> the enemy, who are the allies and what are the long term goals.
>
> 1-WHO IS THE ENEMY
> Since the September attacks, the standard explanation posits that
> dictatorships and lack of democracy are the main causes of terrorism. This
> explanation is obviously true. However, it seems too abstract because the
> connections between some dictatorships and terrorism are not immediately
> obvious.
> Moreover, the word "terrorism" does not seem adequate for designating the
> enemy. We are not only facing few groups. In reality, these groups are
> supported by an ideology, Islamism, which is more and more expanding among
> the muslim world. What is more, this ideology is clearly backed up by some
> specific states. In short, we have better to say that Islamism is the
> enemy.
>
> 11-Islamism is the enemy
>
> Many eminent US scholars have defined Islamism: Firstly, Islamism hates
> modernity, capitalism, human rights, democracy, science and knowledge. It
> relies on the Sharia'a which is the opposite of human rights, decency, and
> a civilized way of life. Just like the nazism, Islamism propagates anti
> semitism.
> Secondly, Islamism is the tank of terrorism. Many evidences show that
> Islamism brings everywhere troubles and violence. Of course, islamists
> maintain that they condemn terrorism but in the mosque, radical imams
> deliver hatred speeches, recruit young people and send them to the
> battlefield. In fact Islamism and terrorism are closely connected.
> Islamism is the political channel and terrorism the military channel of
> the same plague.
>
> Thirdly, Islamism is expanding on the fast lane: Few years ago, the hijab
> the more visible islamic criteria, was only worn by old women or by women
> living in Iran and Saudi Arabia. Today, everywhere in the world, most of
> muslim women, even very young girls, wear the hijab.
>
> At this point some scholars may object that Islamism and its indicator,
> the wearing of the hijab, are just a matter of religious freedom. Firstly,
> Islamism is not a religion because it has always been condemned by the the
> caliphs who were the commanders of the believers and the guardians of the
> holy places. It means that islamism has nothing to do with a muslim faith.
>
> Secondly, this ideology has nothing to do with freedom of consciousness
> since it is a war ideology. It is worth to recall that by the end of WW2,
> a denazification process was implemented in Europe. All pupils books were
> reviewed and racist ideas extirpated. By this time nobody complained that
> these ideas were just a matter of freedom and consciousness! Today, the
> situation is the same. Just like the nazism, Islamism must be eradicated.
>
> Many Europeans scholars contend that waging war against Islamism could
> lead to a clash of civilizations opposing christians to muslims or the
> riches to the poor's. Firstly, Islamism cannot merit to be ranked as a
> civilizations since it is just a barbarism. Secondly, this barbarous
> ideology does not not only attack the jews and the christians. It also
> threaten the Muslim, Buddhist, Indus and confucian civilizations. For
> example, Muslims are its main victims (notably in Algeria with over
> 100,000 dead's). Another example: Recently a buddhist monk was beheaded by
> the islamists in South Thailand. Obviously this poor monk was not a jew,
> nor a crusader, nor a rich person. It means that islamism is waging war
> against all the civilizations and not only against the "jews and
> crusaders".
>
> We think that these arguments should be put in a formal statement signed
> by an international college of scholars and then endorsed by your
> Administration. Such a statement could define the enemy. It could also
> dissipate the disinformation notably in Europe.
>
> 12-Saudi Arabia and Iran are the main islamic bases
>
> Nazism began in Germany and then expanded in the entire Europe (except the
> United Kingdom). Today, the islamic plague began in Saudi Arabia.
> Wahhabism and the Saudi family implemented a fanatical society inclined to
> backwardness. In the seventies, with the oil crisis, they expanded
> Islamism all over the Muslim world from Morocco and West Africa to
> Indonesia. They used oil money to corrupt and implement Islamic regimes or
> Islamic opposition in an increasing number of countries. Since the
> beginning, they finance terrorism and provide it with leaders (Bin Laden).
>
> Some reforms are expected in Saudi Arabia but every people think that it
> could need a long span of time. Within this period, Islamism will going on
> in expanding its troubles, violence's and terrorism. Such a situation
> cannot be accepted. Already, many opinion leaders are thinking that your
> Administration too much indulges for this rogue State. Of course, we know
> that this country possess the largest oil fields in the world. However, we
> may also bring some comfort in saying that nobody want to storm these
> precious oil fields. The actual question is: How can we separate the oil
> money and the Islamism?
>
> Few time ago, some US advisors answered to this question. They proposed to
> replace the feudal ruling class and to reshape the entire country.
> Whatever the solution, the objective is to prevent islamists to use oil
> money. This goal involves a tough diplomatic action backed up by a a light
> military pressure: Saudi Arabia is not a real State but just an aggregate
> of feudal tribes which only survive thank to the west.
>
> The second Islamic tank is Iran. The Shah was engaging his country towards
> modernization through a constant struggle against obscurantism. Despite
> this fact, we gave facilities to Khomeiny and he took over Iran. We know
> the result: alltheway to the seventh century! Today, we cannot accept that
> the mullah power get a nuclear weapon: In a near future, every European
> capital would be within range of ballistic missile based in Iran. Since it
> should be unwise to trust in the Mullah promises, a diplomatic option
> cannot bring any solution. It means that a preemptive strike must be on
> the agenda.
>
> On the other hand, Iran is not Saudi Arabia. Iran was a civilized area
> before the fall of the Shah and a powerful educated middle class still
> exists among the population. Young people are notably eager to topple the
> regime. This goal can be performed through an indirect policy based on a
> strong support to the opposition.
>
> With the death of Arafat, a new land of Islamism is appearing. Clearly,
> the islamic movements are expected to seize the power. The Palestinian
> territories will soon become an international terrorist harbor just like
> Afghanistan before. In such a context, the Israel-Palestinian road map is
> going nowhere and your Administration has better to ignore the European
> claims. Obviously, the negotiations would only resume when all the
> terrorist movements and their State sponsors such as Syria, Saudi Arabia
> and Iran would have been neutralized. For the present, the best solution
> is to let Israel the responsibility to deal with the problem.
>
> 2-WHO ARE THE ALLIES
>
> One of the most debated issue of the four last years has been the problem
> of the alliance. Your second mandate could bring an opportunity to clarify
> the matter. It has been said that the US did not enough discuss the issues
> with their allies. Of course you could recall that you do not intend to
> discuss with your enemies or their trojan Horse (In Europe notably). On
> the other hand, the USA must not appear isolated. Time is coming to
> establish a Great Alliance with the three big countries that are
> threatened by the Islamism: Russia, China and India.
>
> Paradoxically, the US have no military alliance with these three
> countries. Indeed, your only multilateral alliance is the old NATO
> including some countries which are the good friends of your worst enemies!
> It means that your second mandate could offer the opportunity to reshape
> the Alliance network notably with regard to the old Europe.
> 21-Establish a new Great Alliance
>
> You may notice that Russia, China and India were your war allies during
> WW2. It is the same story today. Clearly, and in order to enhance these
> allies, it should be wise to set up with them a formal Great Alliance. Of
> course, the US will keep the leadership but an institutional framework
> could favor free discussions, better understanding and a sharing of the
> burden of the war.
> Of course, the establishment of this Great Alliance implies some
> preliminary steps towards the different partners.
>
> Russia is confronted to the islamic plague in Chechen. The dreadful
> slaughtering of children in Ossetie is just a sign among other of this
> situation. Clearly the Chechen terrorists or the Al quaida terrorists obey
> to the same barbarous ideology. President Putin reiterated his desire to
> work closely with you in the global war on terrorism. It means that the US
> cannot support the activists who defend the terrorists in Chechen. The US
> must also refuse to share the European policy regarding this matter ( The
> reaction of the western European elite after the ossetie butchery was a
> shame). We mean that we must not confuse our enemies with our allies in
> war time. The US have not interest to weaken Russia
>
> China is not yet a democratic country (During WW2 the Soviet Union also
> was not a democratic country. Nevertheless, the US and the Soviet Union
> were allies). China has huge concerns with Islamism which is extending in
> the South East Asia. In such a context, the Taiwan problem must be frozen.
> Since the chinese would like to have their regional power recognized, let
> them dealing with the North Korean Problem. If they do not succeed through
> diplomacy, it would be time to use military measures in partnership. In
> this case, the US could limit their involvement to air strikes, letting
> the chinese leading the ground battle. The US have not interest to be
> alone in this matter because a new korean war will not be a military
> promenade.
>
> India is a friendly democracy. The country is threatened by the islamism
> and should enjoy to participate to the Great Alliance. It is the US
> interest to officially recognize India as a major and permanent ally in
> this region.
>
> We must emphasize the importance to display this Great Alliance with China
> and India because it should be the best demonstration that the world war
> against Islamism is not a clash of civilization or a clash between the
> riches and the poor's. It will prove that it is the war of the united
> civilizations against a single barbarism.
>
> 22-Increase pressure on Europe
>
> Europe is going to loose more and more its influence on the world scene.
> This gloomy situation is not only the result of a poor governance in some
> major countries such as France and Germany. It is also the reflect of the
> low spirit shared by the European population: Demographic decline,
> senility, pacifism, self flagellation and so on. Consequently, the
> islamists consider Europe just like a prey. Immigration from muslim
> countries is boosted! If this trend were going on, we would observe a
> civilization suicide within few decades.
>
> However, Europe could not be for the US a subject of benign neglect.
> Firstly, the US cannot accept that Europe becomes a hub for Islamism and
> terrorism with a fast growing anti semitism. Secondly, US and Europe have
> shared for long the same values. Thirdly, Europe is not yet completely
> lost. It means that a close examination of the global situation must be
> addressed with targeted measures rather than with speeches and
> conferences.
>
> Regarding the war on Islamism, Europe is divided into four components:
> Firstly, the United kingdom, and the Eastern countries stand in the
> freedom corner. Secondly, the German and Nordic countries are neutral.
> However, this position has not resisted to the islamic pressure
> (Netherlands!). As a consequence, they could soon rally the freedom
> corner. Thirdly, the French ruling class is more and more linked to the
> Arab world at the detriment of the European and Atlantic solidarity.
> Finally, some Europeans circles (big business, media's, European
> bureaucracy) are engaged for long in the so-called Euro-Arab dialog. These
> negotiations rely on the increase of immigration from muslims countries
> and the constant disinformation about America and Israel. This situation
> explains the growing anti-américanism in Europe and notably in France.
>
> To fight this dangerous trend, the United States must develop a proactive
> policy separately with each component
>
> -Firstly, the Great Alliance should be only open to the members of the
> first component. It should be fruitless to have some trojan horse in it.
> Consequently, the Great Alliance should replace NATO.
>
> -Secondly, the US could propose a great transatlantic market. This idea
> shall be welcomed by the first and the second component. Such a great
> market will definitely torpedo the concept based on an Europe opposed to
> the United States. It will also eliminate the notion of a "Mediterranean
> Europe" which is just a tool for the islamization of the entire continent.
>
> -Thirdly, in order to fight disinformation and to help the friends of
> America in Europe, the US should consider launching a French language
> service of Radio Free Europe. Six years after the fall of the Berlin wall,
> too much Europeans media's have erected a new wall of propaganda and
> anti-American filth.
>
> 3-DISPLAY THE WAR GOALS AND DISBAND THE UN
>
> You have constantly emphasized that the ultimate war goal was to bring
> democracy and to free the people. What have been done in Afghanistan with
> the fall of the talibans and in Iraq with the fall of Saddam should be
> extended to the entire world. It means that Democracy is going to be the
> unique paradigm in international affairs.
>
> Considering a new definition of the enemy based on Islamism rather than on
> terrorism, you may describe more precisely the liberal reforms preceding
> the effective democracy. For example, women rights must appear at the
> first place on this agenda with some consequences such as the civil
> equality, the abolishment of polygamy, stoning, mutilation and the entire
> sharia'a.( It means that the Ataturk reforms should be extended over all
> the muslim area)
>
> However, many populations have not yet listen to you because the world
> forum is occupied by a corrupt body and its false propaganda: The UN. Your
> Administration is more and more convinced that the UN is a machine against
> democracies, free trade, economic growth and scientific or technical
> progress. With the oil for food program corruption, time is coming to say
> that it is too much. Considering this situation, the UN should not be
> reformed but abandoned. However, free democracies have not interest to get
> out of the organization. It should be better to progressively end it in
> reducing finance and opposing veto to any reform.
>
> On the other hand, a globalized world illustrates the need for a new
> organization devoted to the free countries purposes. Of course, the new
> Great Alliance could bring the opportunity to set up this new
> organization. At first glance, it could notably include the United States,
> the United Kingdom, Japan, India, China and Russia. Such an ensemble would
> represent more than 50% of world population and would have a sufficient
> legitimacy for acting.
>
> Of course, the primary goal should be to neutralize the jihadist network
> and to overthrow the dictatorships in the most afflicted countries.
> Genocides such as Rwanda and today Darfour should be strictly prevented.
> In order to reach these goals, the Alliance could establish an
> international trusteeship system for the administration and supervision of
> the liberated territories.
>
> 4-LONG TERM CHALLENGES
>
> We would like to complete this survey with some remarks about long term
> challenges such as education and economic development. We want to
> underline the role of education since it's our world motto. As we have
> seen along this memo, education is the long term key for a free future.
>
> 41- Education
>
> Education is a world challenge: In poor countries, the bulk of young
> people will far exceed the financial and human capacities of traditional
> education. School enrollments will decline and the number of illiterate
> will grow up. In developed countries, despite large financial resources,
> the traditional education gives more and more bad results.
>
> The cause of this situation is the following: Among most all-human
> activities, education is one, which has never taken advantage from
> technical progress. We teach and we learn nowadays as in Socrates'
> century. People have to meet in a single place, on a rigid time schedule,
> and to follow always the same out-dated content. Moreover, the content of
> education has not evolved and is not adapted to free societies: Negative
> beliefs coming from authoritarian societies are still carried on by public
> and private education. It is disappointing to observe that the opponents
> of democracy too often arise from educated people. It means that the
> content of the actual education has to be completely reviewed.
>
> Clearly, we need a revolution in educational affairs. Internet and multi
> media technologies have potential to revolutionize the learning process.
> It's a pity to see that all this tools are today available's on the market
> and that they are only used to promote play stations and so on. A formal
> statement emanating of your high authority would be sufficient to channel
> investors towards educational matters. According to our own studies, a
> transnational corporate could provide on line secondary education to
> students in the entire world at a lower price and with faster results than
> in the traditional education. This global learning system could reduce
> illiteracy, promote positive values and finally provide us with the
> ultimate weapon against outdated ideologies.
>
> 42-Economic development
>
> Global capitalism is a success story but three facts may impede its
> development:
>
> -Firstly, your Administration should weight on the WTO in order to
> dismantle protectionism on agricultural products. The European Union
> agricultural policy is estimated to cause the poor countries a loss of $20
> billion annually. The US policy regarding cotton also impedes many poor
> africans countries. Some progress in these sensitive domains would
> convince many African and South American countries that they can benefit
> of the globalization.
>
> -Secondly, creativity (in connection with education) is the main driver of
> economic development. However, creativity is more and more impeded by
> ecological considerations. In fact, the environmentalist movements use
> ecology as a new weapon targeting the Free world. Since creativity is the
> magic wand of free countries, the third world dictatorships and their
> ecologist activists (NGO) are trying to undermine technical progress in
> western countries.
>
> As you know, your refusal of the Kyoto protocol has been an argument
> constantly raised by the enemies of America. In our opinion, the US are
> right in refusing to sign the Kyoto protocol. Firstly, there is incomplete
> scientific knowledge of the causes of global climate change. Huge factors
> such as change in the sun energy, or cooling effects of volcanic eruption
> must be taken into account. Secondly, undeveloped countries are mainly
> responsible for this situation through massive deforestation which is
> irreversible because the destroyed humus prevents any further replanting.
> Thirdly, We must engage in carbon storage with a big replanting program in
> our own territories in order to match the damage. Finally, technical
> progress remains the effective solution (Hydrogen fusion) instead of
> complex and unbalanced State regulations.
>
> -Thirdly, we observe that a new world plague is constantly increasing:
> Grand Corruption. In the nineties, World Institutions calculated that the
> criminal activities accounted for 500 billions dollars per year. Today, a
> recent parliamentary report estimates at 5000 billions dollars the amount
> of saving accounts in fiscal paradises (12% of the world GDP). We have to
> question ourselves about the existence of these so-called fiscal
> paradises. In fact, they are fueled by crime, narcotics, terrorism and
> mainly grand corruption. The oil for food program illustrates the increase
> of this plague everywhere. In our opinion, the terrorist emergence can be
> related to this new phenomenon.
> Moral relativism is one of the cause of the increase of grand corruption.
> We may realize that the capitalism cannot work without a minimum of
> ethical values: Grand corruption is like a cancer destroying our inner
> system.
> Fortunately, Mister President, your election has been the victory of
> ethical values over moral relativism. Consequently, all the honest persons
> are expecting from your new Administration a strong commitment in order to
> cure this cancer. We suggest that your intelligence agencies identify
> corrupt people in all countries and release their observations to the
> public. The track over the oil for food program could be a good beginning
> in this sensitive matter.
>
> Please, accept our sincere thanks for all your help and support.
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Dr Gerard Pince
> President of Free World Academy
> ______________________
> http://indonews.free.fr
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LETTER TO PRESIDENT BUSH
- From: kim hook
- Re: LETTER TO PRESIDENT BUSH
- References:
- LETTER TO PRESIDENT BUSH
- From: kim hook
- LETTER TO PRESIDENT BUSH
- Prev by Date: Re: Apa Beda [semedi] dan [memedi] ?
- Next by Date: Re: FRITJOF CAPRA dan J KRISHNAMURTI -- bahan diskusi untuk kita
- Previous by thread: LETTER TO PRESIDENT BUSH
- Next by thread: Re: LETTER TO PRESIDENT BUSH
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
