Tricks etc.
- From: "Arindam Banerjee" <adda1234@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 08:41:53 GMT
On Oct 19, 8:32 pm, benlizross <benli...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
adda1...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Within the last few years, we had Arindam Banerjee posting that not
only were there no good languages before Sanskrit; there was not any
human communication that could be dignified to the extent of being
called a language - people had to grunt like pigs before Goddess
Saraswati gave Sanskrit to man.
So they still do, when they do not speak anything derived from
Sanskrit (the source of all worthwhile languages) properly, and so,
abuse the fundamental principles underlying human communication. They
think, and behave, even worse than swine, consequently - as all
current affairs show, and the environment suffers.
If they learnt to speak elegantly and properly, then they could think
and hopefully behave correspondingly.
This sort of nonsense is said only by Hindus.
Most modern Hindus are, very unfortunately, and thanks to their
secular background which has done away with the teaching of Sanskrit
in school, no better now than the others, that way. This is the
great triumph of the atheists, achieved after so much mendacity in
their diverse evil pseudo-intellectual fashions.
I wrote as a Sanatan Dharmi, that is, a pre-Socratic type, a
pantheist, beyond the scope of time... who fortunately studied
Sanskrit for six years under Jesuit instruction (Shri Ekka, our
Adivasi Christian teacher, I remember very fondly for making us speak
properly, and not just Sanskrit, but Hindi as well.)
Well, well, fashions change with time, and as I see the wheel is
turning! Hindus are increasingly noting what wonders they have lost
or surrendered foolishly, and how remarkably they have been fooled,
regarding their past history and Vedic culture, by the cunning
foreigners and their surrogates. Heh-heh.
Heh heh indeed. From what you say, the Hindus have apparently been
grievously fooled about the several thousand languages in the world that
are not derived from Sanskrit.
What I meant was they have been grievously fooled about the meanings of
their Sanskritic pasts.
And somehow I don't think it has been
those wicked Christians who have been filling their heads with these
folk tales about "grunting like pigs" and suchlike nonsense.
When foreginers like Max Mueller and Co are binned, along with their
ideological descendants, then understanding will dawn, from deep
understanding of the ORIGINAL TEXTS as traditionally handed down. It is not
just a certain kind of mendacious narrow/close-minded Christianity; it is
also a combination of arrogance, racism and essentially oneupmanship of the
secular Eurocentrics. (Ultimately, it boils down to anti-competitive
business tricks. To make the Indians feel ashamed of their past, and so,
give it up for Western trash.. Then give it back to them, in some
Westernised commercialised form, like Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, etc.
that are a very pale shadow of the glorious Indian epics, all ignored and
scorned.)
As an actor, I got my best and memorable moments on stage when I recited
some lines from Kalidas. What a wonderful feeling it was. The entire
audience was rapt, and they all say they remember it! Indeed, the rest of
my speech, on stage or off, is like grunting as pigs, in comparison.
Ross Clark
No Europeans or Arabs
spout such arrant nonsense. "People grunted before Allah gave Arabic"?
Never heard of such nonsense from a Muslim.
They probably learnt something about proper communication when they
were ruled by Vikramaditya. No matter how hard they try, they cannot
eradicate their pagan past.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
- Prev by Date: bollywoodi.blogspot.com
- Next by Date: Re: Who is Durga?
- Previous by thread: bollywoodi.blogspot.com
- Next by thread: Re: US gets first Indian state governor (AFP via Yahoo! News)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
