Re: Govt Auditor criticizes Lingle spending of money for poor.
- From: m.purves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 22:30:06 -0000
Lawrence Akutagawa wrote:
> "Alvin E. Toda" <aet@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1138337702-sch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Has it changed then? IIRC there was a court case in
>> Santa Cruz whether the homeless could use a location
>> that they gathered in for an address. IIRC the court
>> said it is OK. But maybe the law has changed. Hawaii
>> just requires a mailing address for voting. You need to
>> establish residency if you plan to run for office.
>>
> aha - found something on the web:
>
> http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2004/Aug/02/ln/ln05a.html
>
> Both a legal residence and a mailing address are required, as
> explained
> in
> the article.
but it sounds like your legal residence can be a park bench and
you mailing address can be "General Delivery" ...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Govt Auditor criticizes Lingle spending of money for poor.
- From: Alvin E. Toda
- Re: Govt Auditor criticizes Lingle spending of money for poor.
- References:
- Govt Auditor criticizes Lingle spending of money for poor.
- From: Alvin E. Toda
- Re: Govt Auditor criticizes Lingle spending of money for poor.
- From: Lawrence Akutagawa
- Govt Auditor criticizes Lingle spending of money for poor.
- Prev by Date: Re: Govt Auditor criticizes Lingle spending of money for poor.
- Next by Date: Re: Price Cap proposal to can it
- Previous by thread: Re: Govt Auditor criticizes Lingle spending of money for poor.
- Next by thread: Re: Govt Auditor criticizes Lingle spending of money for poor.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
