Re: talking point by guy horelle
- From: kafouREMOVE@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:29:12 -0500
On 10 Jan 2006 04:42:15 -0800, "Gwo Mango" <boukman2003@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>Now more generalizations: the wealth of the upper class (for lack of a
>better word) is unproportional to the wealth of the majority. But I
>suspect you mean, like everyone else, that the upper class should have
>LESS wealth, as opposed to the lower classes having MORE wealth. Is
>that it?
You are getting warmer.....
>Because I see it as everyone should be having cookies, not
>taking cookies away from everyone.
>
The problem is, your homeys have taken ALL the cookies and made it
impossible for most people to get a bite.
K.
.
- References:
- Re: talking point by guy horelle
- From: Gwo Mango
- Re: talking point by guy horelle
- From: kafouREMOVE
- Re: talking point by guy horelle
- From: Gwo Mango
- Re: talking point by guy horelle
- From: kafouREMOVE
- Re: talking point by guy horelle
- Prev by Date: Re: Le Brésil admet la thèse du suicide du général Bacellar
- Next by Date: Re: Elections : Gare à la catastrophe !
- Previous by thread: Re: talking point by guy horelle
- Next by thread: Haiti élections-- CEP -- Le nouveau calendrier une planification très sérieuse
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading