Re: For Paulo and Renowl: A pissed-off website.
- From: just the crab <bisayangigolo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 30, 9:44�am, Dirty Sick Pig <drtysicpig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
JC wrote:
"Dirty Sick Pig" <drtysicpig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a �crit dans le message de
news: j6NHj.1431$p97.453@xxxxxxxxxxx
=====================================
http://www.easytraining.com/terms.htm
=====================================
The hard stuff for Renowl and Paulo starts on the fifth paragraph.
Your obsession with litigation , pettifoging about what belongs to
who on Internet is so boring, and never ending;
American citizen Renowl's obsession with PGMA, pettifogging about the RP
constitution not conducive to his hate, is just as never ending AND
supported by stolen articles. �Do you care the hell for this?
what the hell do you care ?
You don't care because you're being deliberately clueless. �That's
unbecoming of you.
Nearly every post has some quibbling of yours about soemone having 'stolen'
some text from Internet;
Yes. �Is it as bad as your encouragement, defense and tolerance of
stolen articles? �Too bad.....and sad. �The term "tit-for-tat" has
nothing do do with tits.
the latter was set up for sharing and not for commercial
reasons;
Share away! �Legally, of course, and as inoffensive as possible.
Nothing about a sitting president worshiping her husband's penis. �This
is fine with me if given as an off-color a joke but when used with hate,
derision and the intent to inflame readers, then it's tit-for-tat time.
� Do you disagree with this? �Of course you do. �BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAWR!
can't you just drop your obsession or find another one ?
I will when I see you and others tackling--really doing something to
stop--the obscene obsession being forced upon this group. �I'm sure
you're bright enough to notice what I'm referring to, and objective
enough to set aside your own beliefs and prejudices to look at things
from a neutral perspective. �Or is this wishful thinking?
I have no problems with the message; it's the illegal delivery that I
have problems with, more so with its tolerance and defense. �The
messenger has been the subject of too many admonitions for over 10 years
from too many members who want, and wanted, to enjoy a hate-free
soc.culture.filipino. �SCF is NOT a single poster's blog.
Would you care to use your rear view mirror minus the blinders?
Best regards,
D.S.Poot
this is from the same nut [ chip norman alias dsp] who post
peoples addresses, phone numbers, call peoples wives whores without
evidence, post wives pictures, post peoples place of business
[ while inserting false statements designed to be really crabbish
and libelous],nagmamalinis pa ang ongoy na eto . madami na etong
tinaboy sa ng na eto due to his cyber harrassment. why do you think
there are only 4 or 6 active posters here? inggat ka lang baka i
post din niya ang address , picture mo and paste lies on it too just
to make you go away .
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: For Paulo and Renowl: A pissed-off website.
- From: Dirty Sick Pig
- Re: For Paulo and Renowl: A pissed-off website.
- References:
- For Paulo and Renowl: A pissed-off website.
- From: Dirty Sick Pig
- Re: For Paulo and Renowl: A pissed-off website.
- From: JC
- Re: For Paulo and Renowl: A pissed-off website.
- From: Dirty Sick Pig
- For Paulo and Renowl: A pissed-off website.
- Prev by Date: Re: UNITEDPHILIPPINES.COM Filipino Social Network - Possibly the next biggest network in the Philippines
- Next by Date: Re: Welcome to Soc.Culture.Filipino!! Mar 27 2008
- Previous by thread: Re: For Paulo and Renowl: A pissed-off website.
- Next by thread: Re: For Paulo and Renowl: A pissed-off website.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|