Re: chr says military is acting very suspicious

On Jul 27, 3:15?pm, "DirtySickPig@PigsLodge#1"
<drtysic...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
chr wrote:
On Jul 25, 9:11?am, "DirtySickPig@PigsLodge#1"
<drtysic...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-----
Where's the evidence of kidnapping? Where's the trial? Where's the
conviction? This guy is asking for legal rights for the alleged victim
(who might be in California, for all we know) that he's not willing to
give to the alleged suspects, who are not even legally suspects yet.
Stop the bull*** posts, Renowl, or read it first and annotate.

We're more interested in what YOU think, item-by-item. We can find the
article ourselves or you can just provide the link.

Guilty by Inference Pig
-----
evidence of kidnapping?? he was taken againts his will in public by
unknown people .

-----
So if they're unknown, ergo, they're military! Your own words are
choking you.
-----> there was plenty of witnesses.

-----
And as I keep pointing out, the military is composed of idiots who will
do a kidnapping in front of witnesses, and allegedly used a vehicle with
hot license tags. The tag number was provided by witnesses who "just
happened to be there" and the tag was again spotted by "human rights
volunteers" who "just happened to be" wandering without escorts in an
army encampment. Idiots or worse, riight?
-----> they just dont have specific leads as to who.

-----
Therefore, they can only be military, riight? That's what you keep saying.
-----> but right now circumstantial evidence point to the military.

-----
Ok. The circumstances (as in "circumstantial) are these: A kidnapping
was perpetrated in front of witnesses. How many kidnappers do you know
are willing to do that crap, unless they want the kidnapping to be
widely publicized by a gullible media?
-----
> its like an oj thing.
-----
Riight! Riight! I agree most shaekesperitically!
-----> nobody saw if there was murder or by whom. he has disappeared for
months just like hundreds of others .maybe the toothfairy took him
eh? maybe he went out for a walk?sure. but evidence just like it
pointed to oj points to the military[ license plate] . there you go.
you start from there since thats where the arrow point . thats just
standard procedure right? you dont say arrow points at the military
then you point at the npa. thats like saying the evidence pointed at
oj and now we search for some homeless guy who probably killed
nicole..

-----
O.J. was found by a competent court of law to be NOT GUILTY after
presentation, examination and challenging the CIRCUMSTANCIAL EVIDENCE
againts him. Can your brain handle this much disappointment? BWAHAHAHAWR!
------ Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

so you really think oj was innocent? hehehe. suuure. even black
people think he did it althu not in court hehehehe

.