Re: Interesting RP SC decision

On Jul 7, 5:19 pm, Chris Blunt <chris_bl...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 15:55:04 -0700, Cheeze <csmarasi...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:





On 6 Jul, 07:11, Boracay Bill <boracayb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Seen in today's Manila Times:

---begin snippets
The Supreme Court has ruled to reject the petition of a group of
drugstore owners seeking to halt the operation of the law giving a 20-
percent discount to senior citizens on the price of medicines and
medical services.
...
The High Court's decision reaffirms the principle that the public good
prevails over individual property rights.
...
"Moreover, the right to property has a social dimension. While Article
XIII of the Constitution provides the precept for the protection of
property, various laws and jurisprudence, particularly on agrarian
reform and the regulation of contracts and public utilities,
continuously serve as a reminder that the right to property can be
relinquished upon the command of the State for the promotion of public
good."
...
---end snippets

For the entire piece, seehttp://www.manilatimes.net/national/2007/july/06/yehey/opinion/200707...

I actually have a sis-in-law whose a pharmacist who explained why that
20% discount is ridiculous. I wonder if anybody realized that right
now, there are pharmacies that only have a 5-10% mark up on their
prices. Giving a 20% discount to anybody would mean the pharmacy
would be paying some people to buy their goods!!! <groan>

Here is why whenever the "Supreme Court" or any branch of government
decide against free market for the sake of the public good should be
careful. Because of this law to cater to senior citizens (what
percentage are they of the pupulation, I wonder?) a pharmacy would
need to give a mark-up of about 25% of their prices just to make
money. Boo-hoo for the majority, wouldn't you say?

If the pharmacies want to get around this, they could simply increase
their marked prices by 20%, and then give *everyone* a 20% discount.

Chris- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

They can probably do that awhile. But if too many do that too often,
you can be sure that the BIR would think of some harsh regulation
against it.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Interesting RP SC decision
    ... 20% discount is ridiculous. ... Because of this law to cater to senior citizens (what ... need to give a mark-up of about 25% of their prices just to make ... If the pharmacies want to get around this, ...
    (soc.culture.filipino)
  • Re: Getting rid of yes-man in parliament !
    ... It is not evil to get discount from ... How come CPIB is involved? ... We all get discount for purchases. ... It is clearly stated in the law that when the PM refuses to give ...
    (soc.culture.singapore)
  • Re: Getting rid of yes-man in parliament !
    ... Don't you know whether there is a law against it? ... Are they NOT supposed to get any discount ... Why was CPIB prevented from investigating! ... It is not evil to get discount from ...
    (soc.culture.singapore)
  • Electric Company Not Honoring Their Commitment to Seniors
    ... By law, the electric company is supposed to give a 50% discount on the ... As a result of informing the Complaints Department of the Electric ...
    (soc.culture.jewish)
  • Re: Interesting RP SC decision
    ... I didn't know that senior citizen discounts were enshrined in law. ... discount price based on? ... RA9257 requires that senior citizens shall be entitled to (partial ... exclusive use or enjoyment of senior citizens; ...
    (soc.culture.filipino)
Loading