Re: VFA - accused US serviceman paedophile in Aus

On Jun 27, 12:55?am, Chris Blunt <chris_bl...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:16:56 -0700, rambo the fugitive bedol





<bernardson...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 27, 12:15?am, Chris Blunt <chris_bl...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:35:13 -0700, carmina villanoel

<bernardson...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 26, 6:43?am, "Just JT" <JohnnyT...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Australia happy to turnover jurisdiction of accused serviceman to US
authorities, no problemo. Why is this a problem with PI authorities?

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=274906

--
No.dramas.about.losing.sovereignty.here.

australia also said they have no problem with turning over any
aussie military rapists to pinas if they ever do it in pinas
territory. why are the aussies more cooperative compared to some? is
it the water? not pi authority but us.

Is there a VFA between the Philippines and Australia similar to that
with the USA?

Chris

they went there a month or so ago for joint training saw it on tv

I know they did, but is there a treaty between the two countries that
defines how illegal actions by visiting forces will be dealt with?
That's the key to who has jurisdiction in such cases.

Chris- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

they asked the person in charge and he said that is what they would
do. didnt follow if there is on paper. australia kinda flies below
the radar when it comes to pinas interest. its not like it is us ,
japan or china wherein the relationship is more intertwined

.

Relevant Pages