Re: Restriction on Freedom of Speech seen in proposed revision to RP constitution

tumbaga wrote:
boracaybill@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
tumbaga wrote:

boracaybill@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

tumbaga wrote:
<snip>

You identified one definition of responsible, which is BTW in SC
decision defining the limits of freedom of speech.
No one is contesting that decision.

Could you please cite that decision? I would like to read it.
Is it a decision of the RP SC or the US SC?

That famous "Shouting fire in a crowded theatre" decision:
http://www.answers.com/topic/schenck-v-united-states
Decision written by Oliver Wendel Holmes

OK, I see. This is a US SC decision. US SC decisions, of course, are
not binding on the RP SC, but it is not unusual for the RP SC to
incorporate legal reasoning contained in US SC decisions into their own
legal reasoning.

This is what I had been saying before, Philippine laws sometimes were just copied even though their experience and history do not have it.

You will find a lot of it, making it confusing and sometimes contradictory to Philippine traditions and maybe even its constitution.

What's wrong with that? Those were liberal legislators molded to your own pattern. And haven't you been monitoring SCOTUS? BWAHAHAHAHAWR!

Jean-Francois Pig
.

Relevant Pages