Re: Restriction on Freedom of Speech seen in proposed revision to RP constitution


Dirty Sick Pig wrote:
boracaybill@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
tumbaga wrote:
<snip>
You identified one definition of responsible, which is BTW in SC
decision defining the limits of freedom of speech.
No one is contesting that decision.

Could you please cite that decision? I would like to read it.
Is it a decision of the RP SC or the US SC?

While you guys are at it, can you please find out what happened to the
soap box requirement?

Your legal vocabulary word for today is: "Shephardize."

SoapBoxDerbyLoserPig
Burn, Akron, Burn!

Test Sig:
Nothing stands between the Wall of Freedom and a firing squad but a
miserable line of blindfolded and handcuffed stinky liberals.
~~Da Doity Seek Peeg~~

Reactions, por favore.

I am not a legal nerd, so this one took me a while. AFAICT,
"shepardization" is, in the internal vocabulary of the legal community,
the act of finding new cases on the subject, and looking up subsequent
decisions that reference a given case. My comment: (1) WTF? (2) BFD

.

Relevant Pages