Abortion (Re: Eccentric)

"Dirty Sick Pig" <drtysicpig@xxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:1BZsg.14820$Wh7.6200@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sylvia Knörr wrote:
"tumbaga" <tanso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:12aqsc1894hu7c5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dirty Sick Pig wrote:

Of course some people find the constitutionally UNSPECIFIED "woman's
right to privacy" as being the right to kill their unborn babies, but
that is another matter. But since we're here, is abortion a God-given
right to you?

That is totally between the woman and her God, throughout history, yes,
even in the bible, women finds ways to abort the babies they carry.
Among Austronesians they hve herbs and tree barks.. etc.. to do the
same.
It had always been the woman and her God, I am not part of that.

Did you know that even some animals have abortions when under stress?
This
way Mother Nature saves the effort of a pregnancy when it's clear that
the
offspring wouldn't have much chances to survive.

That is natural abortion and called miscarriage. We're discussing
artificially induced miscarriages called by libs "woman's right to
privacy" and *** around unprotected.

Okay, I accept that a miscarriage and an abortion are two different things.
But I think not too many women "*** around unprotected" - it's more likely
that the pill doesn't work because of digestion problems, the condom was
damaged, the woman got raped, the baby is seriously sick etc - there are
many reasons why a woman can get pregnant with an unwanted child.

As for humans, it's often that the mother decides for an abortion only
when
she sees the future of the baby would be dim.

Ever heard of adoption?

Sure. That's another option, but to carry a child for 9 month and then give
it away is probably much much harder than having an abortion at an early
stage.
I also think that to be raised by his/her biological mother (and father, in
best case) is almost always better than being adopted by someone else.

In Texas and in many other states, there is a No-Questions Jaw. Just
give your baby to any state agency including the DMV, fire or police
station, any hospital, the National Guard, etc., and no questions will
be asked. The baby will be accepted and its life will be saved,
regardless of any plans libs have for it. There is no need to kill it
while making its way out of the womb.

We do have a similar thing in Germany, the "anonymous birth", to guaranty
proper medical care for mother and child. Still, I think it's the MOTHER who
should decide whether to have or not have her baby. I understand that some
prefer the baby not to be born at all over giving birth and leaving it
behind.

So maybe she spares her baby a (short) life in misery.

"Maybe" is a cop-out. Nobody can predict the future for any baby,
including those born to very poor or extremely rich parents. Hell, the
murdering mother might win the lottery right after her exercise of her
"rights to privacy."

Agreed. But if the doctor would tell me that I'll give birth to a seriously
handicapped child, I wouldn't believe in heavenly intervention or a miracle
to happen to make my child sane, although this possibility might exist.

Ever heard of SAFE SEX? Birth Control?

I'm all for it. But *** happens.

I will agree to non-medically required abortion if the mother will also
volunteer to get killed along with her fetus.


I think for a man it's easy to be strict about this, because men never find
themselves in such a situation. I say: let the pregnant person decide, and
nobody else.

Female Point Of View Piggy


.